Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Modernize solaris threads support.
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m33aec4yw0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u63j8x4of.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue\, 17 Feb 2009 21\:08\:00 +0200")

>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

Perdo> If you still want those declarations for some reason, I'll
Pedro> put them back.

Eli> Please do, and thanks.

Please also provide your rationale.
We know Pedro's, but we don't know yours.

I have noticed that many patch reviews consist of an opinion without a
reason.  This is bad because it conveys very little information.
Additionally, providing a rationale helps people work out what they
ought to do in the future, and also helps us document our decision
making.

Tom


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-17 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-16  8:57 Pedro Alves
2009-02-16 19:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-16 20:45   ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-16 20:50     ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-17  0:07       ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-17  4:12         ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-17 13:30           ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-17 19:20             ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-17 20:01               ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-17 20:28               ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2009-02-17 20:50                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-17 21:12                   ` Tom Tromey
2009-02-18  2:06                     ` Stan Shebs
2009-02-18 10:13                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-18 14:47                         ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-18 19:50                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-23  0:49 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-23  1:22   ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-23 20:09     ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 14:48       ` Pierre Muller
2009-02-24 14:52         ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 15:04           ` Pierre Muller
2009-02-24 15:31             ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 15:58               ` [Commit] obvious: fix compilation failure for windows-nat.c Pierre Muller
2009-07-20 12:07           ` Restore GNU/Hurd functionality (was: Modernize solaris threads support.) Thomas Schwinge
2009-07-20 13:02             ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-20 15:08               ` Restore GNU/Hurd functionality Thomas Schwinge
2009-07-20 17:33                 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-26 19:45   ` Modernize solaris threads support David Daney
2009-02-27 18:22     ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m33aec4yw0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox