New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt

New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt

[GDB Administrator]

0a1,2
> gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:776: code: OP eol: Do not use &&, or || at the end of a line
gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:776:					 pv_add_constant (regs[rn], imm)) ||
> gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619: deprecate: write_pc: Replace write_pc() with get_frame_base_address or get_frame_id; at present the inferior function call code still uses this when doing a DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK
gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619:  set_gdbarch_write_pc (gdbarch, aarch64_write_pc);
gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619:  set_gdbarch_write_pc (gdbarch, aarch64_write_pc);
274a277,279
> gdb/gdbarch.h:740: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly differentiate between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
gdb/gdbarch.h:740:/* The elfcore writer hook to use to write Linux prpsinfo notes to core
> gdb/gdbarch.h:741: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly differentiate between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
gdb/gdbarch.h:741:   files.  Most Linux architectures use the same prpsinfo32 or
> gdb/gdbarch.h:743: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly differentiate between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
gdb/gdbarch.h:743:   call the Linux generic routines in bfd to write prpsinfo notes by
556a562
> gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c:1451: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly differentiate between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c:1451:  /* Initialize the Linux target descriptions.  */

RE: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt

[Pierre Muller]

  Hi all,

As ARI maintainer,
I was wondering if the fact that
  set_gdbarch_write_pc is treated as write_pc
inside the ARI script is really correct:

  I was always considering that gdbarch specific method are
the right way to do things correctly in multi-target GDB.

  Why is then set_gdbarch_write_pc also considered as deprecated?

  If it should not be, the change below would take care of this:

Pierre Muller 
as ARI maintainer.


2013-02-05  Pierre Muller  <muller@sourceware.org>

        * contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh (write_pc rule): Do not consider
        set_gdbarch_write_pc as deprecated anymore.

Index: gdb_ari.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 gdb_ari.sh
--- gdb_ari.sh  1 Jan 2013 06:32:56 -0000       1.7
+++ gdb_ari.sh  5 Feb 2013 10:06:14 -0000
@@ -1051,7 +1051,6 @@ a DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK"
     category["write_pc"] = ari_deprecate
 }
 /(^|[^_[:alnum:]])write_pc[[:space:]]*\(/ || \
-/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])set_gdbarch_write_pc[[:space:]]*\(/ || \
 /(^|[^_[:alnum:]])TARGET_WRITE_PC[[:space:]]*\(/ {
     fail("write_pc")
 }

> > gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619: deprecate: write_pc: Replace write_pc() with
> get_frame_base_address or get_frame_id; at present the inferior function
> call code still uses this when doing a DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK
> gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619:  set_gdbarch_write_pc (gdbarch,
aarch64_write_pc);
> gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619:  set_gdbarch_write_pc (gdbarch,
aarch64_write_pc);
> 274a277,279
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:740: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
differentiate
> between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/gdbarch.h:740:/* The elfcore writer hook to use to write Linux
prpsinfo
> notes to core
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:741: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
differentiate
> between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/gdbarch.h:741:   files.  Most Linux architectures use the same
> prpsinfo32 or
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:743: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
differentiate
> between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/gdbarch.h:743:   call the Linux generic routines in bfd to write
> prpsinfo notes by
> 556a562
> > gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c:1451: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux',
instead
> use 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> differentiate between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears
> on the same line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c:1451:  /* Initialize the Linux target descriptions.
*/

[RFC/RFA] Remove ARI warning for set_gdbarch_write_pc use

[Pierre Muller]

  I realized that the global maintainers might not have 
seen this message, which is really 
a request for comments or approval.

Pierre Muller
as ARI maintainer


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Pierre Muller
> Envoyé : mardi 5 février 2013 11:10
> À : gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet : RE: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D
2013-02-05-gmt
> 
>   Hi all,
> 
> As ARI maintainer,
> I was wondering if the fact that
>   set_gdbarch_write_pc is treated as write_pc
> inside the ARI script is really correct:
> 
>   I was always considering that gdbarch specific method are
> the right way to do things correctly in multi-target GDB.
> 
>   Why is then set_gdbarch_write_pc also considered as deprecated?
> 
>   If it should not be, the change below would take care of this:
> 
> Pierre Muller
> as ARI maintainer.
> 
> 
> 2013-02-05  Pierre Muller  <muller@sourceware.org>
> 
>         * contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh (write_pc rule): Do not consider
>         set_gdbarch_write_pc as deprecated anymore.
> 
> Index: gdb_ari.sh
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh,v
> retrieving revision 1.7
> diff -u -p -r1.7 gdb_ari.sh
> --- gdb_ari.sh  1 Jan 2013 06:32:56 -0000       1.7
> +++ gdb_ari.sh  5 Feb 2013 10:06:14 -0000
> @@ -1051,7 +1051,6 @@ a DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK"
>      category["write_pc"] = ari_deprecate
>  }
>  /(^|[^_[:alnum:]])write_pc[[:space:]]*\(/ || \
> -/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])set_gdbarch_write_pc[[:space:]]*\(/ || \
>  /(^|[^_[:alnum:]])TARGET_WRITE_PC[[:space:]]*\(/ {
>      fail("write_pc")
>  }
> 
> > > gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619: deprecate: write_pc: Replace write_pc() with
> > get_frame_base_address or get_frame_id; at present the inferior function
> > call code still uses this when doing a DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK
> > gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619:  set_gdbarch_write_pc (gdbarch,
> aarch64_write_pc);
> > gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619:  set_gdbarch_write_pc (gdbarch,
> aarch64_write_pc);
> > 274a277,279
> > > gdb/gdbarch.h:740: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> differentiate
> > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:740:/* The elfcore writer hook to use to write Linux
> prpsinfo
> > notes to core
> > > gdb/gdbarch.h:741: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> differentiate
> > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:741:   files.  Most Linux architectures use the same
> > prpsinfo32 or
> > > gdb/gdbarch.h:743: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> differentiate
> > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:743:   call the Linux generic routines in bfd to write
> > prpsinfo notes by
> > 556a562
> > > gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c:1451: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux',
> instead
> > use 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> > differentiate between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux'
appears
> > on the same line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c:1451:  /* Initialize the Linux target descriptions.
> */

Re: [RFC/RFA] Remove ARI warning for set_gdbarch_write_pc use

[Joel Brobecker]

> > 2013-02-05  Pierre Muller  <muller@sourceware.org>
> > 
> >         * contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh (write_pc rule): Do not consider
> >         set_gdbarch_write_pc as deprecated anymore.

Sorry for the amount of time it took to get this reviewed.
This is OK.

-- 
Joel

Re: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt

[Sergio Durigan Junior]

On Tuesday, February 05 2013, GDB Administrator wrote:

>> gdb/gdbarch.h:740: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly differentiate between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/gdbarch.h:740:/* The elfcore writer hook to use to write Linux prpsinfo notes to core
>> gdb/gdbarch.h:741: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly differentiate between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/gdbarch.h:741:   files.  Most Linux architectures use the same prpsinfo32 or
>> gdb/gdbarch.h:743: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly differentiate between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/gdbarch.h:743:   call the Linux generic routines in bfd to write prpsinfo notes by
> 556a562

These were introduced by the PRPSINFO patches, but I don't agree with
them (and don't see an elegant way to fix them).  Is there any way to
silent those warnings?

-- 
Sergio

RE: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt

[Pierre Muller]

  This issue has been discussed partly
already in the thread:

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00286.html

But I don't think that we really reached the point
to agree that we should simply completely remove this 
rule.

  I will resubmit the removal as a separate email
to see if we can agree on it.


Pierre
as ARI maintainer


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Sergio Durigan Junior
> Envoyé : mercredi 6 février 2013 03:05
> À : gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet : Re: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D
2013-02-05-gmt
> 
> On Tuesday, February 05 2013, GDB Administrator wrote:
> 
> >> gdb/gdbarch.h:740: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
differentiate
> between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:740:/* The elfcore writer hook to use to write Linux
> prpsinfo notes to core
> >> gdb/gdbarch.h:741: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
differentiate
> between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:741:   files.  Most Linux architectures use the same
> prpsinfo32 or
> >> gdb/gdbarch.h:743: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
differentiate
> between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:743:   call the Linux generic routines in bfd to write
> prpsinfo notes by
> > 556a562
> 
> These were introduced by the PRPSINFO patches, but I don't agree with
> them (and don't see an elegant way to fix them).  Is there any way to
> silent those warnings?
> 
> --
> Sergio

[RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt)

[Pierre Muller]

  As announced in the previous email,
I would like to rediscuss the question 
about removing the GNU/Linux rule.


Comments expected,

Pierre Muller
as ARI maintainer



2013-02-06  Pierre Muller  <muller@sourceware.org>

        * contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh (GNU/Linux rule): Remove.

Index: contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 gdb_ari.sh
--- contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh      1 Jan 2013 06:32:56 -0000       1.7
+++ contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh      6 Feb 2013 10:01:03 -0000
@@ -257,21 +257,6 @@ BEGIN {

 # Things in comments

-BEGIN { doc["GNU/Linux"] = "\
-Do not use `Linux'\'', instead use `Linux kernel'\'' or `GNU/Linux
system'\'';\
- comments should clearly differentiate between the two (this test assumes
that\
- word `Linux'\'' appears on the same line as the word `GNU'\'' or
`kernel'\''\
- or a kernel version"
-    category["GNU/Linux"] = ari_comment
-}
-/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])Linux([^_[:alnum:]]|$)/ \
-&& !/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])Linux\[sic\]([^_[:alnum:]]|$)/ \
-&& !/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])GNU\/Linux([^_[:alnum:]]|$)/ \
-&& !/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])Linux kernel([^_[:alnum:]]|$)/ \
-&& !/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])Linux [[:digit:]]\.[[:digit:]]+)/ {
-    fail("GNU/Linux")
-}
-
 BEGIN { doc["ARGSUSED"] = "\
 Do not use ARGSUSED, unnecessary"
     category["ARGSUSED"] = ari_regression


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Pierre Muller
> Envoyé : mercredi 6 février 2013 10:59
> À : 'Sergio Durigan Junior'; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet : RE: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D
2013-02-05-gmt
> 
>   This issue has been discussed partly
> already in the thread:
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00286.html
> 
> But I don't think that we really reached the point
> to agree that we should simply completely remove this
> rule.
> 
>   I will resubmit the removal as a separate email
> to see if we can agree on it.
> 
> 
> Pierre
> as ARI maintainer
> 
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> > owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Sergio Durigan Junior
> > Envoyé : mercredi 6 février 2013 03:05
> > À : gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > Objet : Re: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D
> 2013-02-05-gmt
> >
> > On Tuesday, February 05 2013, GDB Administrator wrote:
> >
> > >> gdb/gdbarch.h:740: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead
use
> > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> differentiate
> > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > > gdb/gdbarch.h:740:/* The elfcore writer hook to use to write Linux
> > prpsinfo notes to core
> > >> gdb/gdbarch.h:741: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead
use
> > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> differentiate
> > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > > gdb/gdbarch.h:741:   files.  Most Linux architectures use the same
> > prpsinfo32 or
> > >> gdb/gdbarch.h:743: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead
use
> > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> differentiate
> > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > > gdb/gdbarch.h:743:   call the Linux generic routines in bfd to write
> > prpsinfo notes by
> > > 556a562
> >
> > These were introduced by the PRPSINFO patches, but I don't agree with
> > them (and don't see an elegant way to fix them).  Is there any way to
> > silent those warnings?
> >
> > --
> > Sergio

Re: [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt)

[Joel Brobecker]

>   As announced in the previous email,
> I would like to rediscuss the question 
> about removing the GNU/Linux rule.

I cannot approve by myself, but I agree with removing the rule.
This rule has caused way to much work already, and I do not think
it helps anything.

> 2013-02-06  Pierre Muller  <muller@sourceware.org>
> 
>         * contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh (GNU/Linux rule): Remove.
> 
> Index: contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh,v
> retrieving revision 1.7
> diff -u -p -r1.7 gdb_ari.sh
> --- contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh      1 Jan 2013 06:32:56 -0000       1.7
> +++ contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh      6 Feb 2013 10:01:03 -0000
> @@ -257,21 +257,6 @@ BEGIN {
> 
>  # Things in comments
> 
> -BEGIN { doc["GNU/Linux"] = "\
> -Do not use `Linux'\'', instead use `Linux kernel'\'' or `GNU/Linux
> system'\'';\
> - comments should clearly differentiate between the two (this test assumes
> that\
> - word `Linux'\'' appears on the same line as the word `GNU'\'' or
> `kernel'\''\
> - or a kernel version"
> -    category["GNU/Linux"] = ari_comment
> -}
> -/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])Linux([^_[:alnum:]]|$)/ \
> -&& !/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])Linux\[sic\]([^_[:alnum:]]|$)/ \
> -&& !/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])GNU\/Linux([^_[:alnum:]]|$)/ \
> -&& !/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])Linux kernel([^_[:alnum:]]|$)/ \
> -&& !/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])Linux [[:digit:]]\.[[:digit:]]+)/ {
> -    fail("GNU/Linux")
> -}
> -
>  BEGIN { doc["ARGSUSED"] = "\
>  Do not use ARGSUSED, unnecessary"
>      category["ARGSUSED"] = ari_regression
> 
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> > owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Pierre Muller
> > Envoyé : mercredi 6 février 2013 10:59
> > À : 'Sergio Durigan Junior'; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > Objet : RE: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D
> 2013-02-05-gmt
> > 
> >   This issue has been discussed partly
> > already in the thread:
> > 
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00286.html
> > 
> > But I don't think that we really reached the point
> > to agree that we should simply completely remove this
> > rule.
> > 
> >   I will resubmit the removal as a separate email
> > to see if we can agree on it.
> > 
> > 
> > Pierre
> > as ARI maintainer
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> > > owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Sergio Durigan Junior
> > > Envoyé : mercredi 6 février 2013 03:05
> > > À : gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > > Objet : Re: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D
> > 2013-02-05-gmt
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, February 05 2013, GDB Administrator wrote:
> > >
> > > >> gdb/gdbarch.h:740: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead
> use
> > > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> > differentiate
> > > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> > > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > > > gdb/gdbarch.h:740:/* The elfcore writer hook to use to write Linux
> > > prpsinfo notes to core
> > > >> gdb/gdbarch.h:741: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead
> use
> > > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> > differentiate
> > > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> > > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > > > gdb/gdbarch.h:741:   files.  Most Linux architectures use the same
> > > prpsinfo32 or
> > > >> gdb/gdbarch.h:743: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead
> use
> > > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> > differentiate
> > > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> > > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> > > > gdb/gdbarch.h:743:   call the Linux generic routines in bfd to write
> > > prpsinfo notes by
> > > > 556a562
> > >
> > > These were introduced by the PRPSINFO patches, but I don't agree with
> > > them (and don't see an elegant way to fix them).  Is there any way to
> > > silent those warnings?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sergio
> 

-- 
Joel

Re: [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt)

[Joel Brobecker]

> 2013-02-06  Pierre Muller  <muller@sourceware.org>
> 
>         * contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh (GNU/Linux rule): Remove.

Based on feedback from Mark, Tom, and myself, I think there is enough
support for me to approve. Please go ahead.

-- 
Joel

RE: [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt)

[Pierre Muller]

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Joel Brobecker
> Envoyé : jeudi 14 février 2013 14:56
> À : Pierre Muller
> Cc : 'Sergio Durigan Junior'; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet : Re: [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb
5
> 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt)
> 
> > 2013-02-06  Pierre Muller  <muller@sourceware.org>
> >
> >         * contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh (GNU/Linux rule): Remove.
> 
> Based on feedback from Mark, Tom, and myself, I think there is enough
> support for me to approve. Please go ahead.

Thanks for the approval,

patch committed.

Pierre Muller
as ARI maintainer

Re: [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> writes:

Pierre>   As announced in the previous email,
Pierre> I would like to rediscuss the question 
Pierre> about removing the GNU/Linux rule.

It is fine by me.

Tom

Re: [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:04:06 +0100
> 
>   As announced in the previous email,
> I would like to rediscuss the question 
> about removing the GNU/Linux rule.

Aren't we throwing away the baby together with the bath water?

What text was flagged by these rules that we think is kosher?  Can we
modify these rules such that they don't flag such kosher phrases?

Re: [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt)

[Joel Brobecker]

> Aren't we throwing away the baby together with the bath water?
> What text was flagged by these rules that we think is kosher?  Can we
> modify these rules such that they don't flag such kosher phrases?

I think we're spending way too much time on this compared to
its relative importance...

-- 
Joel

Re: [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:19:33 -0800
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>, sergiodj@redhat.com,
> 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > Aren't we throwing away the baby together with the bath water?
> > What text was flagged by these rules that we think is kosher?  Can we
> > modify these rules such that they don't flag such kosher phrases?
> 
> I think we're spending way too much time on this compared to
> its relative importance...

Maybe so, but this argument goes both ways...