From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5376 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2013 09:59:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 5355 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Feb 2013 09:59:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:59:23 +0000 Received: from md13.u-strasbg.fr (md13.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.248]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id r169xGT7019234 ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:59:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms16.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.204.116]) by md13.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id r169xFDE008064 ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:59:15 +0100 (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) Received: from E6510Muller (gw-ics.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.225]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id r169xF7d006225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:59:15 +0100 (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Sergio Durigan Junior'" , References: <20130205020110.GA5646@sourceware.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <002001ce0450$9de57b00$d9b07100$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 This issue has been discussed partly already in the thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00286.html But I don't think that we really reached the point to agree that we should simply completely remove this=20 rule. I will resubmit the removal as a separate email to see if we can agree on it. Pierre as ARI maintainer > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches- > owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Sergio Durigan Junior > Envoy=E9=A0: mercredi 6 f=E9vrier 2013 03:05 > =C0=A0: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Objet=A0: Re: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt >=20 > On Tuesday, February 05 2013, GDB Administrator wrote: >=20 > >> gdb/gdbarch.h:740: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly differentiate > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version > > gdb/gdbarch.h:740:/* The elfcore writer hook to use to write Linux > prpsinfo notes to core > >> gdb/gdbarch.h:741: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly differentiate > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version > > gdb/gdbarch.h:741: files. Most Linux architectures use the same > prpsinfo32 or > >> gdb/gdbarch.h:743: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use > 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly differentiate > between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same > line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version > > gdb/gdbarch.h:743: call the Linux generic routines in bfd to write > prpsinfo notes by > > 556a562 >=20 > These were introduced by the PRPSINFO patches, but I don't agree with > them (and don't see an elegant way to fix them). Is there any way to > silent those warnings? >=20 > -- > Sergio