From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
To: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 10:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001e01ce0388$e41155e0$ac3401a0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130205020110.GA5646@sourceware.org>
Hi all,
As ARI maintainer,
I was wondering if the fact that
set_gdbarch_write_pc is treated as write_pc
inside the ARI script is really correct:
I was always considering that gdbarch specific method are
the right way to do things correctly in multi-target GDB.
Why is then set_gdbarch_write_pc also considered as deprecated?
If it should not be, the change below would take care of this:
Pierre Muller
as ARI maintainer.
2013-02-05 Pierre Muller <muller@sourceware.org>
* contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh (write_pc rule): Do not consider
set_gdbarch_write_pc as deprecated anymore.
Index: gdb_ari.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 gdb_ari.sh
--- gdb_ari.sh 1 Jan 2013 06:32:56 -0000 1.7
+++ gdb_ari.sh 5 Feb 2013 10:06:14 -0000
@@ -1051,7 +1051,6 @@ a DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK"
category["write_pc"] = ari_deprecate
}
/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])write_pc[[:space:]]*\(/ || \
-/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])set_gdbarch_write_pc[[:space:]]*\(/ || \
/(^|[^_[:alnum:]])TARGET_WRITE_PC[[:space:]]*\(/ {
fail("write_pc")
}
> > gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619: deprecate: write_pc: Replace write_pc() with
> get_frame_base_address or get_frame_id; at present the inferior function
> call code still uses this when doing a DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK
> gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619: set_gdbarch_write_pc (gdbarch,
aarch64_write_pc);
> gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:2619: set_gdbarch_write_pc (gdbarch,
aarch64_write_pc);
> 274a277,279
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:740: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
differentiate
> between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/gdbarch.h:740:/* The elfcore writer hook to use to write Linux
prpsinfo
> notes to core
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:741: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
differentiate
> between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/gdbarch.h:741: files. Most Linux architectures use the same
> prpsinfo32 or
> > gdb/gdbarch.h:743: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux', instead use
> 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
differentiate
> between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears on the same
> line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/gdbarch.h:743: call the Linux generic routines in bfd to write
> prpsinfo notes by
> 556a562
> > gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c:1451: comment: GNU/Linux: Do not use 'Linux',
instead
> use 'Linux kernel' or 'GNU/Linux system'; comments should clearly
> differentiate between the two (this test assumes that word 'Linux' appears
> on the same line as the word 'GNU' or 'kernel' or a kernel version
> gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c:1451: /* Initialize the Linux target descriptions.
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-05 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-05 2:01 GDB Administrator
2013-02-05 10:09 ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2013-02-14 9:44 ` [RFC/RFA] Remove ARI warning for set_gdbarch_write_pc use Pierre Muller
2013-04-15 17:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-02-06 2:05 ` New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt Sergio Durigan Junior
2013-02-06 9:59 ` Pierre Muller
2013-02-06 10:04 ` [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt) Pierre Muller
2013-02-06 15:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-02-14 13:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-02-14 21:09 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <19773.0148713619$1360145095@news.gmane.org>
2013-02-06 16:08 ` [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <002001ce0450$9de57b00$d9b07100$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
[not found] ` <002301ce0451$4cbc6440$e6352cc0$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
2013-02-06 18:26 ` [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt) Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-06 19:19 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-02-06 19:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001e01ce0388$e41155e0$ac3401a0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr' \
--to=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox