From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25991 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2013 13:56:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 25979 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2013 13:56:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:56:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6566C2E698; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:56:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id TEVbtzVk1-i0; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:56:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCD62E2DE; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:56:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3615AC17A6; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 05:56:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: 'Sergio Durigan Junior' , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove ARI GNU/Linux rule (was: New ARI warning Tue Feb 5 02:01:10 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-05-gmt) Message-ID: <20130214135615.GA7955@adacore.com> References: <20130205020110.GA5646@sourceware.org> <002001ce0450$9de57b00$d9b07100$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <002301ce0451$4cbc6440$e6352cc0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002301ce0451$4cbc6440$e6352cc0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 > 2013-02-06 Pierre Muller > > * contrib/ari/gdb_ari.sh (GNU/Linux rule): Remove. Based on feedback from Mark, Tom, and myself, I think there is enough support for me to approve. Please go ahead. -- Joel