* Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 @ 2003-09-19 22:29 Michael Elizabeth Chastain 2003-09-19 23:58 ` Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-09-19 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jimb; +Cc: gdb I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches archive, but that takes just a few seconds. Michael C ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 2003-09-19 22:29 macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-09-19 23:58 ` Christopher Faylor 2003-09-20 0:04 ` Jim Blandy 2003-09-20 4:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-09-19 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 2003-09-19 23:58 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2003-09-20 0:04 ` Jim Blandy 2003-09-20 0:19 ` bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) Christopher Faylor 2003-09-22 2:55 ` macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 Daniel Berlin 2003-09-20 4:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Jim Blandy @ 2003-09-20 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: gdb Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, > >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. > >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches > >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. > > Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching > to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) 2003-09-20 0:04 ` Jim Blandy @ 2003-09-20 0:19 ` Christopher Faylor 2003-09-22 2:55 ` macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 Daniel Berlin 1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-09-20 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: gdb On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:01:44PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: >Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> writes: > >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: >> >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, >> >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. >> >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches >> >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. >> >> Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching >> to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. > >Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way >GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it. You mean can you send email to bugzilla and have it file the bug? I think Daniel Berlin has that set up for gcc, yes. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 2003-09-20 0:04 ` Jim Blandy 2003-09-20 0:19 ` bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) Christopher Faylor @ 2003-09-22 2:55 ` Daniel Berlin 1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-09-22 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: Christopher Faylor, gdb On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Jim Blandy wrote: > Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, > > >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. > > >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches > > >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. > > > > Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching > > to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. > > Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way > GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it. Uhh, of course. It's even much simpler than the gnats handling code, because it's a simple database operation. The bulk of the code (a couple hundred lines of perl) is devoted to parsing out and handling attachments in the email (while a perl module handles most of the details, we still have to do stuff with the data itself, make up a filename for stupid mailers, etc), as well as verifying permissions and issuing new accounts for new users. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 2003-09-19 23:58 ` Christopher Faylor 2003-09-20 0:04 ` Jim Blandy @ 2003-09-20 4:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2003-09-22 3:05 ` Daniel Berlin 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-09-20 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:58:18PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, > >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. > >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches > >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. > > Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching > to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. I'd say, absolutely. I've been meaning to ask Daniel B. about setting one up for binutils too. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 2003-09-20 4:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-09-22 3:05 ` Daniel Berlin 2003-09-22 3:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-09-22 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:58:18PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, > > >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. > > >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches > > >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. > > > > Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching > > to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. > > I'd say, absolutely. I've been meaning to ask Daniel B. about setting > one up for binutils too. binutils is easier than gdb, because binutils has nothing right now. Thus, there's nothing to convert :P. GDB has GNATS, and in order to keep the bug numbers the same, we'd have to set up a new install of bugzilla (since bugzilla bug ids are "globally" unique to a given bugzilla instance, rather than unique to a given product). Does GDB have any different gnats fields than gcc's gnats used to? If not, i can run the conversion script on the database, import the data into my test database on dberlin.org, and you guys could see what the converted db looks like (though i don't have inbound email handling set up on my machine). --Dan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 2003-09-22 3:05 ` Daniel Berlin @ 2003-09-22 3:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-09-22 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: gdb On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:05:05PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:58:18PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > > >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, > > > >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. > > > >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches > > > >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. > > > > > > Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching > > > to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. > > > > I'd say, absolutely. I've been meaning to ask Daniel B. about setting > > one up for binutils too. > > binutils is easier than gdb, because binutils has nothing right now. > Thus, there's nothing to convert :P. > > GDB has GNATS, and in order to keep the bug numbers the same, we'd have > to set up a new install of bugzilla (since bugzilla bug ids are > "globally" unique to a given bugzilla instance, rather than unique to a > given product). Yeah, at this point I guess we'd prefer to hold on to the PR ids. We've documented some of them... > Does GDB have any different gnats fields than gcc's gnats used to? > > If not, i can run the conversion script on the database, import the data > into my test database on dberlin.org, and you guys could see what the > converted db looks like (though i don't have inbound email handling set up > on my machine). I don't think it does. Different things in the category lists et cetera, of course. But that's it. Right now it's: Reporter, CC, Number, Category, Synopsis, Confidential, Severity, Priority, Responsible, State, Class, Submitter-Id, Arrival-Date, Closed-Date, Last-Modified, Originator, Release, Organization, Environment, Description, File Attachments, How-To-Repeat, Fix, Release-Note, Unformatted, and the Audit Trail. Usual caveats about how much some of those are worth. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) @ 2003-09-20 0:54 Michael Elizabeth Chastain 2003-09-22 3:00 ` Daniel Berlin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-09-20 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cgf, jimb; +Cc: gdb jimb> Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way jimb> GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it. Yes, for example: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12066 For a gcc bug where Chris and I e-mailed in some comments. Michael C ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) 2003-09-20 0:54 bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-09-22 3:00 ` Daniel Berlin 2003-09-22 19:45 ` Jim Blandy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-09-22 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: cgf, jimb, gdb On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > jimb> Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way > jimb> GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it. > > Yes, for example: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12066 > > For a gcc bug where Chris and I e-mailed in some comments. You can actually even email in attachments, and it'll attach them to the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) 2003-09-22 3:00 ` Daniel Berlin @ 2003-09-22 19:45 ` Jim Blandy 2003-09-22 22:54 ` Daniel Berlin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Jim Blandy @ 2003-09-22 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, cgf, gdb Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes: > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > > jimb> Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way > > jimb> GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it. > > > > Yes, for example: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12066 > > > > For a gcc bug where Chris and I e-mailed in some comments. > > You can actually even email in attachments, and it'll attach them to the > bug. Cool. I'm sold. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) 2003-09-22 19:45 ` Jim Blandy @ 2003-09-22 22:54 ` Daniel Berlin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-09-22 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, cgf, gdb On Sep 22, 2003, at 3:41 PM, Jim Blandy wrote: > Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes: > >> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: >> >>> jimb> Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the >>> way >>> jimb> GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it. >>> >>> Yes, for example: >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12066 >>> >>> For a gcc bug where Chris and I e-mailed in some comments. >> >> You can actually even email in attachments, and it'll attach them to >> the >> bug. > > Cool. I'm sold. > I'll try to do a test conversion this weekend and see what happens. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-22 22:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-09-19 22:29 macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 Michael Elizabeth Chastain 2003-09-19 23:58 ` Christopher Faylor 2003-09-20 0:04 ` Jim Blandy 2003-09-20 0:19 ` bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) Christopher Faylor 2003-09-22 2:55 ` macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 Daniel Berlin 2003-09-20 4:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2003-09-22 3:05 ` Daniel Berlin 2003-09-22 3:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2003-09-20 0:54 bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) Michael Elizabeth Chastain 2003-09-22 3:00 ` Daniel Berlin 2003-09-22 19:45 ` Jim Blandy 2003-09-22 22:54 ` Daniel Berlin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox