From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28211 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2003 00:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28204 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2003 00:04:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2003 00:04:36 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id 3C0292075B; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 19:01:45 -0500 (EST) To: Christopher Faylor Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 References: <200309192229.h8JMT9q0021832@duracef.shout.net> <20030919235818.GC17343@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 00:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030919235818.GC17343@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor writes: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, > >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. > >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches > >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. > > Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching > to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it.