From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24588 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2003 23:58:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24552 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 23:58:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (24.131.133.249) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2003 23:58:24 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 4EAE96C700; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 19:58:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:58:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 Message-ID: <20030919235818.GC17343@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200309192229.h8JMT9q0021832@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309192229.h8JMT9q0021832@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. cgf