From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25242 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2003 03:05:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25235 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2003 03:05:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2003 03:05:06 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO dberlin.org) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.1) with ESMTP-TLS id 5053231; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:05:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 03:05:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 In-Reply-To: <20030920043932.GA4742@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: References: <200309192229.h8JMT9q0021832@duracef.shout.net> <20030919235818.GC17343@redhat.com> <20030920043932.GA4742@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:58:18PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, > > >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. > > >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches > > >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. > > > > Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching > > to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. > > I'd say, absolutely. I've been meaning to ask Daniel B. about setting > one up for binutils too. binutils is easier than gdb, because binutils has nothing right now. Thus, there's nothing to convert :P. GDB has GNATS, and in order to keep the bug numbers the same, we'd have to set up a new install of bugzilla (since bugzilla bug ids are "globally" unique to a given bugzilla instance, rather than unique to a given product). Does GDB have any different gnats fields than gcc's gnats used to? If not, i can run the conversion script on the database, import the data into my test database on dberlin.org, and you guys could see what the converted db looks like (though i don't have inbound email handling set up on my machine). --Dan