* Re: bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3)
@ 2003-09-20 0:54 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-09-22 3:00 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-09-20 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cgf, jimb; +Cc: gdb
jimb> Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way
jimb> GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it.
Yes, for example:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12066
For a gcc bug where Chris and I e-mailed in some comments.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3)
2003-09-20 0:54 bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2003-09-22 3:00 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-09-22 19:45 ` Jim Blandy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-09-22 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: cgf, jimb, gdb
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> jimb> Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way
> jimb> GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it.
>
> Yes, for example:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12066
>
> For a gcc bug where Chris and I e-mailed in some comments.
You can actually even email in attachments, and it'll attach them to the
bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3)
2003-09-22 3:00 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2003-09-22 19:45 ` Jim Blandy
2003-09-22 22:54 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2003-09-22 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, cgf, gdb
Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> > jimb> Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way
> > jimb> GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it.
> >
> > Yes, for example:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12066
> >
> > For a gcc bug where Chris and I e-mailed in some comments.
>
> You can actually even email in attachments, and it'll attach them to the
> bug.
Cool. I'm sold.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3)
2003-09-22 19:45 ` Jim Blandy
@ 2003-09-22 22:54 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-09-22 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, cgf, gdb
On Sep 22, 2003, at 3:41 PM, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>>
>>> jimb> Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the
>>> way
>>> jimb> GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it.
>>>
>>> Yes, for example:
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12066
>>>
>>> For a gcc bug where Chris and I e-mailed in some comments.
>>
>> You can actually even email in attachments, and it'll attach them to
>> the
>> bug.
>
> Cool. I'm sold.
>
I'll try to do a test conversion this weekend and see what happens.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3
@ 2003-09-19 22:29 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-09-19 23:58 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-09-19 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jimb; +Cc: gdb
I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual,
and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch.
That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches
archive, but that takes just a few seconds.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3
2003-09-19 22:29 macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2003-09-19 23:58 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-09-20 0:04 ` Jim Blandy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-09-19 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual,
>and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch.
>That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches
>archive, but that takes just a few seconds.
Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching
to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3
2003-09-19 23:58 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-09-20 0:04 ` Jim Blandy
2003-09-20 0:19 ` bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2003-09-20 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: gdb
Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual,
> >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch.
> >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches
> >archive, but that takes just a few seconds.
>
> Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching
> to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better.
Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way
GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3)
2003-09-20 0:04 ` Jim Blandy
@ 2003-09-20 0:19 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-09-20 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: gdb
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:01:44PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>> >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual,
>> >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch.
>> >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches
>> >archive, but that takes just a few seconds.
>>
>> Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching
>> to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better.
>
>Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way
>GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it.
You mean can you send email to bugzilla and have it file the bug?
I think Daniel Berlin has that set up for gcc, yes.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-22 22:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-20 0:54 bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-09-22 3:00 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-09-22 19:45 ` Jim Blandy
2003-09-22 22:54 ` Daniel Berlin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-19 22:29 macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-09-19 23:58 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-09-20 0:04 ` Jim Blandy
2003-09-20 0:19 ` bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) Christopher Faylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox