From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31565 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2003 00:19:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31556 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2003 00:19:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (24.131.133.249) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2003 00:19:28 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id CE87B32A822; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:19:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 00:19:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: bugzilla (was Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3) Message-ID: <20030920001921.GA17614@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200309192229.h8JMT9q0021832@duracef.shout.net> <20030919235818.GC17343@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00253.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:01:44PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: > >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: >> >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, >> >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. >> >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches >> >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. >> >> Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching >> to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. > >Does bugzilla allow you to CC the bug on E-mail messages, the way >GNATS does? I love that, and I haven't seen bugzilla do it. You mean can you send email to bugzilla and have it file the bug? I think Daniel Berlin has that set up for gcc, yes. cgf