From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28457 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2003 04:39:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28450 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2003 04:39:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2003 04:39:32 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1A0ZWu-0001F4-AZ for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 00:39:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 04:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: macros/726: Internal GDB errors with current GDB snapshots and -gdwarf2-3 Message-ID: <20030920043932.GA4742@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200309192229.h8JMT9q0021832@duracef.shout.net> <20030919235818.GC17343@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030919235818.GC17343@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:58:18PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:29:09PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > >I think it's good to send the patch to gdb-patches as usual, > >and then mail to gdb-gnats with a URL that points to the patch. > >That means you have to for the patch to show up in the gdb-patches > >archive, but that takes just a few seconds. > > Just as an aside, I'm wondering if it is time to consider switching > to bugzilla. I think bugzilla handles this issue a little better. I'd say, absolutely. I've been meaning to ask Daniel B. about setting one up for binutils too. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer