From: Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
To: Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] Implement support for recording extension register ld/st insn
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANu=DmipyTp=mBvWkYJ22qMboYfsj7x3LmWZZZWYGyFdnKYqDw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407935535-27978-5-git-send-email-omair.javaid@linaro.org>
On 13 August 2014 14:12, Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org> wrote:
> gdb:
>
> 2014-08-13 Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
>
> * arm-tdep.c (arm_record_asimd_vfp_coproc): Updated.
> (arm_record_exreg_ld_st_insn): Added record handler for ex-register
> load/store instructions.
>
> ---
> gdb/arm-tdep.c | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 165 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> index d003619..315b5b0 100644
> --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> @@ -11990,6 +11990,169 @@ arm_record_unsupported_insn (insn_decode_record *arm_insn_r)
> return -1;
> }
>
> +/* Record handler for extension register load/store instructions. */
> +
> +static int
> +arm_record_exreg_ld_st_insn (insn_decode_record *arm_insn_r)
> +{
> + uint32_t opcode, single_reg;
> + uint8_t op_vldm_vstm;
> + uint32_t record_buf[8], record_buf_mem[128];
> + ULONGEST u_regval = 0;
> +
> + struct regcache *reg_cache = arm_insn_r->regcache;
> + const int num_regs = gdbarch_num_regs (arm_insn_r->gdbarch);
> +
> + opcode = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 20, 24);
> + single_reg = bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 8);
> + op_vldm_vstm = opcode & 0x1b;
> +
> + /* Handle VMOV instructions. */
> + if ((opcode & 0x1e) == 0x04)
> + {
> + if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 4))
> + {
> + record_buf[0] = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 12, 15);
> + record_buf[1] = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 16, 19);
> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 2;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + uint8_t reg_m = (bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0, 3) << 1)
> + | bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 5);
> +
> + if (!single_reg)
> + {
> + record_buf[0] = num_regs + reg_m;
> + record_buf[1] = num_regs + reg_m + 1;
> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 2;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + record_buf[0] = reg_m + ARM_D0_REGNUM;
> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 1;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + /* Handle VSTM and VPUSH instructions. */
> + else if (op_vldm_vstm == 0x08 || op_vldm_vstm == 0x0a
> + || op_vldm_vstm == 0x12)
> + {
> + uint32_t start_address, reg_rn, imm_off32, imm_off8, memory_count;
> + uint32_t memory_index = 0;
> +
> + reg_rn = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 16, 19);
> + regcache_raw_read_unsigned (reg_cache, reg_rn, &u_regval);
> + imm_off8 = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0, 7);
> + imm_off32 = imm_off8 << 24;
> + memory_count = imm_off8;
> +
> + if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 23))
> + start_address = u_regval;
> + else
> + start_address = u_regval - imm_off32;
> +
> + if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 21))
> + {
> + record_buf[0] = reg_rn;
> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 1;
> + }
> +
> + while (memory_count)
> + {
> + if (!single_reg)
> + {
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index] = start_address;
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 1] = 4;
> + start_address = start_address + 4;
> + memory_index = memory_index + 2;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index] = start_address;
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 1] = 4;
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 2] = start_address + 4;
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 3] = 4;
> + start_address = start_address + 8;
> + memory_index = memory_index + 4;
> + }
> + memory_count--;
> + }
> + }
> + /* Handle VLDM instructions. */
> + else if (op_vldm_vstm == 0x09 || op_vldm_vstm == 0x0b
> + || op_vldm_vstm == 0x13)
> + {
> + uint32_t reg_count, reg_vd;
> + uint32_t reg_index = 0;
> +
> + reg_vd = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 12, 15);
> + reg_count = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0, 7);
> +
> + if (single_reg)
> + reg_vd = reg_vd | (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0) << 4);
> + else
> + reg_vd = (reg_vd << 1) | bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0);
> +
> + if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 21))
> + record_buf[reg_index++] = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 16, 19);
> +
> + while (reg_count)
> + {
> + if (single_reg)
> + record_buf[reg_index++] = num_regs + reg_vd + reg_count - 1;
> + else
> + record_buf[reg_index++] = ARM_D0_REGNUM + reg_vd + reg_count - 1;
> +
> + reg_count--;
> + }
> + }
> + /* VSTR Vector store register. */
> + else if ((opcode & 0x13) == 0x10)
> + {
> + uint32_t start_address, reg_rn, imm_off32, imm_off8, memory_count;
> + uint32_t memory_index = 0;
> +
> + reg_rn = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 16, 19);
> + regcache_raw_read_unsigned (reg_cache, reg_rn, &u_regval);
> + imm_off8 = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0, 7);
> + imm_off32 = imm_off8 << 24;
> + memory_count = imm_off8;
> +
> + if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 23))
> + start_address = u_regval + imm_off32;
> + else
> + start_address = u_regval - imm_off32;
> +
> + if (single_reg)
> + {
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index] = start_address;
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 1] = 4;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index] = start_address;
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 1] = 4;
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 2] = start_address + 4;
> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 3] = 4;
> + }
> + }
> + /* VLDR Vector load register. */
> + else if ((opcode & 0x13) == 0x11)
> + {
> + uint8_t single_reg = 0;
> + uint8_t special_case;
Is there some missing code here? Should there be a TODO comment?
> +
> + record_buf[0] = 0;
> + record_buf[1] = 0;
> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 2;
> + }
> +
> + REG_ALLOC (arm_insn_r->arm_regs, arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count, record_buf);
> + MEM_ALLOC (arm_insn_r->arm_mems, arm_insn_r->mem_rec_count, record_buf_mem);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* Record handler for arm/thumb mode VFP data processing instructions. */
>
> static int
> @@ -12218,11 +12381,11 @@ arm_record_asimd_vfp_coproc (insn_decode_record *arm_insn_r)
> {
> /* Handle extension register ld/st instructions. */
> if (!(op1 & 0x20))
> - return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
> + return arm_record_exreg_ld_st_insn (arm_insn_r);
>
> /* 64-bit transfers between arm core and extension registers. */
> if ((op1 & 0x3e) == 0x04)
> - return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
> + return arm_record_exreg_ld_st_insn (arm_insn_r);
> }
> else
> {
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Will Newton
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-13 13:13 [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM process record/replay improvements Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] Implement support for recording extension register ld/st insn Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 14:10 ` Will Newton [this message]
2014-08-27 9:21 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:17 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-28 12:56 ` Omair Javaid
2014-09-02 14:59 ` Will Newton
2014-09-10 11:29 ` Omair Javaid
2014-09-10 11:55 ` Will Newton
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] Implements support for recording thumb2 ASIMD struct " Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 14:10 ` Will Newton
2014-08-27 9:08 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:09 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-28 10:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] Implement support for recording thumb2 ASIMD struct ld/st insns Omair Javaid
2014-09-02 14:55 ` Will Newton
2014-09-10 11:16 ` Omair Javaid
2014-09-10 11:54 ` Will Newton
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] Implements support for recording arm/thumb mode coprocessor instructions Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 14:10 ` Will Newton
2014-08-27 9:07 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:05 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-28 9:50 ` [PATCH] Implement " Omair Javaid
2014-09-02 14:51 ` Will Newton
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Fix reverse-step and reverse-next over undebuggable solib code Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 9:09 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:34 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] Implement support for recording vector data transfer instructions Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 14:10 ` Will Newton
2014-08-27 9:09 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:19 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-28 13:07 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] Implement support for recording VFP data processing instructions Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 14:10 ` Will Newton
2014-08-27 9:10 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:11 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-28 11:06 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 9:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM process record/replay improvements Omair Javaid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANu=DmipyTp=mBvWkYJ22qMboYfsj7x3LmWZZZWYGyFdnKYqDw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=will.newton@linaro.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=omair.javaid@linaro.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox