From: Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
To: Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] Implements support for recording arm/thumb mode coprocessor instructions
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANW4E-14Ke6HT2Y9gEu0EWcdAi1ZfeL5aANqCQ=iuqXaUzgDig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANu=DmhTV1rPkiWq3z_67s+Qt3TGbgjF2PAhp0nj1eg+szUVEQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 13 August 2014 19:10, Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 13 August 2014 14:12, Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org> wrote:
>> gdb:
>>
>> 2014-08-13 Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
>>
>> * arm-tdep.c (arm_record_coproc_data_proc): Updated.
>> (arm_record_asimd_vfp_coproc): Added record handler for asimd, vfp
>> and coprocessor insn.
>> (thumb2_record_coproc_insn): New function.
>> (thumb2_record_decode_insn_handler): Updated.
>> (decode_insn): Updated.
>>
>> ---
>> gdb/arm-tdep.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> index b746eee..607b92e 100644
>> --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> @@ -11990,20 +11990,80 @@ arm_record_unsupported_insn (insn_decode_record *arm_insn_r)
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Handling opcode 110 insns. */
>> +
>> +static int
>> +arm_record_asimd_vfp_coproc (insn_decode_record *arm_insn_r)
>> +{
>> + uint32_t op, op1, op1_sbit, op1_ebit, coproc;
>> +
>> + coproc = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 8, 11);
>> + op1 = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 20, 25);
>> + op1_sbit = bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 24);
>> + op1_ebit = bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 20);
>> + op = bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 4);
>
> op abd op1_sbit appear to be unused.
>
>> +
>> + if ((coproc & 0x0e) == 0x0a)
>> + {
>> + /* Handle extension register ld/st instructions. */
>> + if (!(op1 & 0x20))
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> +
>> + /* 64-bit transfers between arm core and extension registers. */
>> + if ((op1 & 0x3e) == 0x04)
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + /* Handle coprocessor ld/st instructions. */
>> + if (!(op1 & 0x3a))
>> + {
>> + /* Store. */
>> + if (!op1_ebit)
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> + else
>> + /* Load. */
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Move to coprocessor from two arm core registers. */
>> + if (op1 == 0x4)
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> +
>> + /* Move to two arm core registers from coprocessor. */
>> + if (op1 == 0x5)
>> + {
>> + uint32_t reg_t[2];
>> +
>> + reg_t[0] = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 12, 15);
>> + reg_t[1] = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 16, 19);
>> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 2;
>> +
>> + REG_ALLOC (arm_insn_r->arm_regs, arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count, reg_t);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Handling opcode 111 insns. */
>>
>> static int
>> arm_record_coproc_data_proc (insn_decode_record *arm_insn_r)
>> {
>> + uint32_t op, op1_sbit, op1_ebit, coproc;
>> struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (arm_insn_r->gdbarch);
>> struct regcache *reg_cache = arm_insn_r->regcache;
>> - uint32_t ret = 0; /* function return value: -1:record failure ; 0:success */
>> ULONGEST u_regval = 0;
>>
>> arm_insn_r->opcode = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 24, 27);
>> + coproc = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 8, 11);
>> + op1_sbit = bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 24);
>> + op1_ebit = bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 20);
>> + op = bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 4);
>>
>> /* Handle arm SWI/SVC system call instructions. */
>> - if (15 == arm_insn_r->opcode)
>> + if (op1_sbit)
>> {
>> if (tdep->arm_syscall_record != NULL)
>> {
>> @@ -12016,21 +12076,52 @@ arm_record_coproc_data_proc (insn_decode_record *arm_insn_r)
>> else /* EABI. */
>> regcache_raw_read_unsigned (reg_cache, 7, &svc_number);
>>
>> - ret = tdep->arm_syscall_record (reg_cache, svc_number);
>> + return tdep->arm_syscall_record (reg_cache, svc_number);
>> }
>> else
>> {
>> printf_unfiltered (_("no syscall record support\n"));
>> - ret = -1;
>> + return -1;
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + if ((coproc & 0x0e) == 0x0a)
>> + {
>> + /* VFP data-processing instructions. */
>> + if (!op1_sbit && !op)
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> +
>> + /* Advanced SIMD, VFP instructions. */
>> + if (!op1_sbit && op)
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> + }
>> else
>> {
>> - arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> - ret = -1;
>> + /* Coprocessor data operations. */
>> + if (!op1_sbit && !op)
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> +
>> + /* Move to Coprocessor from ARM core register. */
>> + if (!op1_sbit && !op1_ebit && op)
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> +
>> + /* Move to arm core register from coprocessor. */
>> + if (!op1_sbit && op1_ebit && op)
>> + {
>> + uint32_t record_buf[1];
>> +
>> + record_buf[0] = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 12, 15);
>> + if (record_buf[0] == 15)
>> + record_buf[0] = ARM_PS_REGNUM;
>> +
>> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 1;
>> + REG_ALLOC (arm_insn_r->arm_regs, arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count,
>> + record_buf);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> - return ret;
>> + return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> }
>>
>> /* Handling opcode 000 insns. */
>> @@ -12946,6 +13037,17 @@ thumb2_record_lmul_lmla_div (insn_decode_record *thumb2_insn_r)
>> return ARM_RECORD_SUCCESS;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Record handler for thumb32 coprocessor instructions. */
>> +
>> +static int
>> +thumb2_record_coproc_insn (insn_decode_record *thumb2_insn_r)
>> +{
>> + if (bit (thumb2_insn_r->arm_insn, 25))
>> + return arm_record_coproc_data_proc (thumb2_insn_r);
>> + else
>> + return arm_record_asimd_vfp_coproc (thumb2_insn_r);
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Decodes thumb2 instruction type and invokes its record handler. */
>>
>> static unsigned int
>> @@ -12977,7 +13079,7 @@ thumb2_record_decode_insn_handler (insn_decode_record *thumb2_insn_r)
>> else if (op2 & 0x40)
>> {
>> /* Co-processor instructions. */
>> - arm_record_unsupported_insn (thumb2_insn_r);
>> + return thumb2_record_coproc_insn (thumb2_insn_r);
>> }
>> }
>> else if (op1 == 0x02)
>> @@ -13043,7 +13145,7 @@ thumb2_record_decode_insn_handler (insn_decode_record *thumb2_insn_r)
>> else if (op2 & 0x40)
>> {
>> /* Co-processor instructions. */
>> - return arm_record_unsupported_insn (thumb2_insn_r);
>> + return thumb2_record_coproc_insn (thumb2_insn_r);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -13087,7 +13189,7 @@ decode_insn (insn_decode_record *arm_record, record_type_t record_type,
>> arm_record_ld_st_reg_offset, /* 011. */
>> arm_record_ld_st_multiple, /* 100. */
>> arm_record_b_bl, /* 101. */
>> - arm_record_unsupported_insn, /* 110. */
>> + arm_record_asimd_vfp_coproc, /* 110. */
>> arm_record_coproc_data_proc /* 111. */
>> };
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Will Newton
> Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
Ping! Kindly provide your feedback and help me approve this patch series.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-13 13:13 [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM process record/replay improvements Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] Implement support for recording extension register ld/st insn Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 14:10 ` Will Newton
2014-08-27 9:21 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:17 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-28 12:56 ` Omair Javaid
2014-09-02 14:59 ` Will Newton
2014-09-10 11:29 ` Omair Javaid
2014-09-10 11:55 ` Will Newton
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] Implements support for recording thumb2 ASIMD struct " Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 14:10 ` Will Newton
2014-08-27 9:08 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:09 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-28 10:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] Implement support for recording thumb2 ASIMD struct ld/st insns Omair Javaid
2014-09-02 14:55 ` Will Newton
2014-09-10 11:16 ` Omair Javaid
2014-09-10 11:54 ` Will Newton
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] Implements support for recording arm/thumb mode coprocessor instructions Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 14:10 ` Will Newton
2014-08-27 9:07 ` Omair Javaid [this message]
2014-08-27 10:05 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-28 9:50 ` [PATCH] Implement " Omair Javaid
2014-09-02 14:51 ` Will Newton
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Fix reverse-step and reverse-next over undebuggable solib code Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 9:09 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:34 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] Implement support for recording vector data transfer instructions Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 14:10 ` Will Newton
2014-08-27 9:09 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:19 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-28 13:07 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] Implement support for recording VFP data processing instructions Omair Javaid
2014-08-13 14:10 ` Will Newton
2014-08-27 9:10 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 10:11 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-28 11:06 ` Omair Javaid
2014-08-27 9:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM process record/replay improvements Omair Javaid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANW4E-14Ke6HT2Y9gEu0EWcdAi1ZfeL5aANqCQ=iuqXaUzgDig@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=omair.javaid@linaro.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=will.newton@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox