From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ac60eac0909100918y6e5b4738t8ee0d53f110ac4c8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090909053848.GA11738@adacore.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 517 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Joel Brobecker<brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
> Otherwise, the patch seems fine. I would love some input from Ulrich,
> though.
Thanks for the review. Attached patch implements your suggestions.
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-10 Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
*minsyms.c (lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section_1): Assert non-NULL
section.
(lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section): Check for NULL section.
(lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc): Adjust.
[-- Attachment #2: gdb-overlay-fix-20090910.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4135 bytes --]
Index: minsyms.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/minsyms.c,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -p -u -r1.66 minsyms.c
--- minsyms.c 28 Jun 2009 00:20:22 -0000 1.66
+++ minsyms.c 10 Sep 2009 16:17:13 -0000
@@ -434,13 +434,14 @@ lookup_minimal_symbol_solib_trampoline (
/* Search through the minimal symbol table for each objfile and find
the symbol whose address is the largest address that is still less
- than or equal to PC, and matches SECTION (if non-NULL). Returns a
- pointer to the minimal symbol if such a symbol is found, or NULL if
- PC is not in a suitable range. Note that we need to look through
- ALL the minimal symbol tables before deciding on the symbol that
- comes closest to the specified PC. This is because objfiles can
- overlap, for example objfile A has .text at 0x100 and .data at
- 0x40000 and objfile B has .text at 0x234 and .data at 0x40048.
+ than or equal to PC, and matches SECTION (which is not NULL).
+ Returns a pointer to the minimal symbol if such a symbol is found,
+ or NULL if PC is not in a suitable range.
+ Note that we need to look through ALL the minimal symbol tables
+ before deciding on the symbol that comes closest to the specified PC.
+ This is because objfiles can overlap, for example objfile A has .text
+ at 0x100 and .data at 0x40000 and objfile B has .text at 0x234 and
+ .data at 0x40048.
If WANT_TRAMPOLINE is set, prefer mst_solib_trampoline symbols when
there are text and trampoline symbols at the same address.
@@ -457,20 +458,12 @@ lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section_1 (C
struct objfile *objfile;
struct minimal_symbol *msymbol;
struct minimal_symbol *best_symbol = NULL;
- struct obj_section *pc_section;
enum minimal_symbol_type want_type, other_type;
want_type = want_trampoline ? mst_solib_trampoline : mst_text;
other_type = want_trampoline ? mst_text : mst_solib_trampoline;
-
- /* PC has to be in a known section. This ensures that anything
- beyond the end of the last segment doesn't appear to be part of
- the last function in the last segment. */
- pc_section = find_pc_section (pc);
- if (pc_section == NULL)
- return NULL;
- /* We can not require the symbol found to be in pc_section, because
+ /* We can not require the symbol found to be in section, because
e.g. IRIX 6.5 mdebug relies on this code returning an absolute
symbol - but find_pc_section won't return an absolute section and
hence the code below would skip over absolute symbols. We can
@@ -479,7 +472,8 @@ lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section_1 (C
files, search both the file and its separate debug file. There's
no telling which one will have the minimal symbols. */
- objfile = pc_section->objfile;
+ gdb_assert (section != NULL);
+ objfile = section->objfile;
if (objfile->separate_debug_objfile)
objfile = objfile->separate_debug_objfile;
@@ -680,6 +674,15 @@ lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section_1 (C
struct minimal_symbol *
lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section (CORE_ADDR pc, struct obj_section *section)
{
+ if (section == NULL)
+ {
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2004-01-27: This was using find_pc_mapped_section to
+ force the section but that (well unless you're doing overlay
+ debugging) always returns NULL making the call somewhat useless. */
+ section = find_pc_section (pc);
+ if (section == NULL)
+ return NULL;
+ }
return lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section_1 (pc, section, 0);
}
@@ -689,13 +692,7 @@ lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section (COR
struct minimal_symbol *
lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc (CORE_ADDR pc)
{
- /* NOTE: cagney/2004-01-27: This was using find_pc_mapped_section to
- force the section but that (well unless you're doing overlay
- debugging) always returns NULL making the call somewhat useless. */
- struct obj_section *section = find_pc_section (pc);
- if (section == NULL)
- return NULL;
- return lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section (pc, section);
+ return lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section (pc, NULL);
}
\f
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 7:34 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 15:59 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 16:27 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-17 17:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-21 20:51 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 21:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 15:23 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 16:33 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 17:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 17:02 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 17:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:08 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:10 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 18:12 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 19:19 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 19:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 19:54 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-17 21:15 ` [commit] Fix reread_symbols crash (Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section) Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-04 14:22 ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Tom Tromey
2009-08-04 15:06 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-04 15:38 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908042358q4d2061d2md3c49cf4aab26398@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m34osmi5jx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908050940we3dc478rd182f4367a650f1b@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908052259l7b1c21d1t212991886a5f8b18@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m3eirofxwh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908070030g7500a5ack3fcc81862e2a5b0a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-08-07 23:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-09 21:37 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-10 18:09 ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-10 20:39 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-17 19:45 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 19:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 22:55 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-18 13:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 18:03 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 18:39 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 21:06 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 22:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-08-21 12:36 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-23 23:25 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 7:21 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 14:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-26 14:38 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 15:17 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 23:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-27 2:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-02 17:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 18:37 ` What should we do re: "[patch] Speed up find_pc_section" Joel Brobecker
2009-09-08 20:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 21:17 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09 5:58 ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09 7:56 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-09 15:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 7:44 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-10 17:36 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-10 18:30 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 1:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 6:51 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 7:29 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 7:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-09-11 7:51 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 7:41 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 8:03 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 8:41 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 17:47 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-13 21:47 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 16:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-14 17:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 17:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 18:10 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 18:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 20:51 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 21:04 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:14 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 7:53 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 8:33 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 8:39 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 16:23 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-09 5:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-10 16:18 ` Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2009-09-11 21:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 16:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-18 18:18 ` Michael Snyder
2009-07-17 18:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 3:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ac60eac0909100918y6e5b4738t8ee0d53f110ac4c8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox