From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ac60eac0908081108nd118424l7a1c88b87130bb78@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0908071529j5be2241bjf7fac5cbf55168a9@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 647 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov<ppluzhnikov@google.com> wrote:
> I was able to reproduce the failed assert on F11/i586, but only after the
> system ran for a while.
Update: running 'make check' on F11 after prelinking shows many
similar failures. The "java setup" in Tom's repro instructions doesn't
appear necessary.
Here is a fix. Tested on F11/i586 (with prelinking) and Linux/x86_64 (without).
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-08 Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
* objfiles.c (qsort_cmp): Remove assert.
(preferred_obj_section): New function.
(update_section_map): Filter duplicates.
[-- Attachment #2: gdb-find_pc_section-20090808.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2875 bytes --]
Index: objfiles.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/objfiles.c,v
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -p -u -r1.89 objfiles.c
--- objfiles.c 4 Aug 2009 18:46:05 -0000 1.89
+++ objfiles.c 8 Aug 2009 17:55:54 -0000
@@ -797,18 +797,36 @@ qsort_cmp (const void *a, const void *b)
gdb_assert (sect1_addr >= obj_section_endaddr (sect2));
return 1;
}
- /* This can happen for separate debug-info files. */
- gdb_assert (obj_section_endaddr (sect1) == obj_section_endaddr (sect2));
return 0;
}
+/* Select "better" obj_section to keep. We prefer the one that came from
+ the real object, rather than the one from separate debuginfo.
+ Most of the time the two sections are exactly identical, but with
+ prelinking the .rel.dyn section in the real object may have different
+ size. */
+
+static struct obj_section *
+preferred_obj_section (struct obj_section *a, struct obj_section *b)
+{
+ gdb_assert (obj_section_addr (a) == obj_section_addr (b));
+ gdb_assert ((a->objfile->separate_debug_objfile == b->objfile)
+ || (b->objfile->separate_debug_objfile == a->objfile));
+ gdb_assert ((a->objfile->separate_debug_objfile_backlink == b->objfile)
+ || (b->objfile->separate_debug_objfile_backlink == a->objfile));
+
+ if (a->objfile->separate_debug_objfile != NULL)
+ return a;
+ return b;
+}
+
/* Update PMAP, PMAP_SIZE with non-TLS sections from all objfiles. */
static void
update_section_map (struct obj_section ***pmap, int *pmap_size)
{
- int map_size, idx;
+ int map_size, i, j;
struct obj_section *s, **map;
struct objfile *objfile;
@@ -828,15 +846,45 @@ update_section_map (struct obj_section *
map = xmalloc (map_size * sizeof (*map));
- idx = 0;
+ i = 0;
ALL_OBJSECTIONS (objfile, s)
if (insert_p (objfile, s))
- map[idx++] = s;
+ map[i++] = s;
#undef insert_p
qsort (map, map_size, sizeof (*map), qsort_cmp);
+ /* With separate debuginfo files, we may have up to two (almost)
+ identical copies of some obj_sections in the map.
+ Filter out duplicates. */
+ for (i = 0, j = 0; i < map_size; ++i)
+ {
+ struct obj_section *sect1 = map[i];
+ struct obj_section *sect2 = (i + 1 < map_size) ? map[i + 1] : NULL;
+
+ if (sect2 == NULL
+ || obj_section_addr (sect1) != obj_section_addr (sect2))
+ map[j++] = sect1;
+ else
+ {
+ map[j++] = preferred_obj_section (sect1, sect2);
+ ++i;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (j < map_size)
+ {
+ /* Some duplicates were eliminated.
+ The new size shouldn't be less than half of the original. */
+ gdb_assert (map_size / 2 <= j);
+ map_size = j;
+
+ map = xrealloc (map, map_size * sizeof (*map)); /* Trim excess space. */
+ }
+ else
+ gdb_assert (j == map_size);
+
*pmap = map;
*pmap_size = map_size;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-08 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 7:34 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 15:59 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 16:27 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-17 17:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-21 20:51 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 21:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 15:23 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 16:33 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 17:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 17:02 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 17:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:08 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:10 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 18:12 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 19:19 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 19:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 19:54 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-17 21:15 ` [commit] Fix reread_symbols crash (Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section) Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-04 14:22 ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Tom Tromey
2009-08-04 15:06 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-04 15:38 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908042358q4d2061d2md3c49cf4aab26398@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m34osmi5jx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908050940we3dc478rd182f4367a650f1b@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908052259l7b1c21d1t212991886a5f8b18@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m3eirofxwh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908070030g7500a5ack3fcc81862e2a5b0a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-08-07 23:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-09 21:37 ` Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2009-08-10 18:09 ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-10 20:39 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-17 19:45 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 19:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 22:55 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-18 13:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 18:03 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 18:39 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 21:06 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 22:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-08-21 12:36 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-23 23:25 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 7:21 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 14:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-26 14:38 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 15:17 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 23:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-27 2:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-02 17:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 18:37 ` What should we do re: "[patch] Speed up find_pc_section" Joel Brobecker
2009-09-08 20:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 21:17 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09 5:58 ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09 7:56 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-09 15:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 7:44 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-10 17:36 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-10 18:30 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 1:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 6:51 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 7:29 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 7:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-09-11 7:51 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 7:41 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 8:03 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 8:41 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 17:47 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-13 21:47 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 16:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-14 17:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 17:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 18:10 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 18:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 20:51 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 21:04 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:14 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 7:53 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 8:33 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 8:39 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 16:23 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-09 5:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-10 16:18 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 16:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-18 18:18 ` Michael Snyder
2009-07-17 18:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 3:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ac60eac0908081108nd118424l7a1c88b87130bb78@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox