From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ac60eac0908201340k6b759eb5o9bb73c8f473d8785@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908201822.n7KIM1vZ008118@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1450 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Ulrich Weigand<uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, this doesn't help. ...
> If you want to remove *all* overlay sections, mapped or not, you
Yes.
> could attempt to use "section_is_overlay" instead. But that won't
> work either -- all the overlay routines have a shortcut that says
> "no" to all such questions before the user actually enabled overlay
> support. This means that when loading a binary with overlays,
> you still crash at the assertion before the user even has the
> chance to give the "overlay auto" command.
Right. Here is an updated patch ...
> It used to be the case that you could debug -to some extent- binaries
> with overlays even in "overlay off" mode, e.g. because GDB does not
> support the particular overlay manager. I think this should be preserved;
> at least GDB should not run into assertion failures just because section
> addresses overlap ...
I believe the crash at load should be gone now, and some debugging will
be possible, though find_pc_section will fail to find any overlay section
which find_pc_mapped_section doesn't find. I think that's still better
than what GDB was doing before under these conditions: finding a "random"
overlapping overlay section.
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
*objfiles.c (insert_section_p): New function.
(update_section_map): Call it.
[-- Attachment #2: gdb-find_pc_section-20090820-2.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1692 bytes --]
Index: objfiles.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/objfiles.c,v
retrieving revision 1.92
diff -u -p -u -r1.92 objfiles.c
--- objfiles.c 17 Aug 2009 11:16:13 -0000 1.92
+++ objfiles.c 20 Aug 2009 20:37:22 -0000
@@ -823,6 +823,24 @@ preferred_obj_section (struct obj_sectio
return b;
}
+/* Return 1 if SECTION should be inserted into the section map.
+ We want to insert only non-overlay and non-TLS section. */
+
+static int
+insert_section_p (const struct bfd *abfd,
+ const struct bfd_section *section)
+{
+ const bfd_vma lma = bfd_section_lma (abfd, section);
+
+ if (lma != 0 && lma != bfd_section_vma (abfd, section))
+ /* This is an overlay section. */
+ return 0;
+ if ((bfd_get_section_flags (abfd, section) & SEC_THREAD_LOCAL) != 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
/* Update PMAP, PMAP_SIZE with non-TLS sections from all objfiles. */
static void
@@ -837,24 +855,18 @@ update_section_map (struct obj_section *
map = *pmap;
xfree (map);
-#define insert_p(objf, sec) \
- ((bfd_get_section_flags ((objf)->obfd, (sec)->the_bfd_section) \
- & SEC_THREAD_LOCAL) == 0)
-
map_size = 0;
ALL_OBJSECTIONS (objfile, s)
- if (insert_p (objfile, s))
+ if (insert_section_p (objfile->obfd, s->the_bfd_section))
map_size += 1;
map = xmalloc (map_size * sizeof (*map));
i = 0;
ALL_OBJSECTIONS (objfile, s)
- if (insert_p (objfile, s))
+ if (insert_section_p (objfile->obfd, s->the_bfd_section))
map[i++] = s;
-#undef insert_p
-
qsort (map, map_size, sizeof (*map), qsort_cmp);
/* With separate debuginfo files, we may have up to two (almost)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-20 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 7:34 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 15:59 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 16:27 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-17 17:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-21 20:51 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 21:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 15:23 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 16:33 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 17:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 17:02 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 17:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:08 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:10 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 18:12 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 19:19 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 19:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 19:54 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-17 21:15 ` [commit] Fix reread_symbols crash (Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section) Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-04 14:22 ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Tom Tromey
2009-08-04 15:06 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-04 15:38 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908042358q4d2061d2md3c49cf4aab26398@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m34osmi5jx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908050940we3dc478rd182f4367a650f1b@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908052259l7b1c21d1t212991886a5f8b18@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m3eirofxwh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908070030g7500a5ack3fcc81862e2a5b0a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-08-07 23:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-09 21:37 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-10 18:09 ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-10 20:39 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-17 19:45 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 19:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 22:55 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-18 13:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 18:03 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 18:39 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 21:06 ` Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2009-08-20 22:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-08-21 12:36 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-23 23:25 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 7:21 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 14:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-26 14:38 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 15:17 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 23:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-27 2:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-02 17:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 18:37 ` What should we do re: "[patch] Speed up find_pc_section" Joel Brobecker
2009-09-08 20:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 21:17 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09 5:58 ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09 7:56 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-09 15:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 7:44 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-10 17:36 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-10 18:30 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 1:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 6:51 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 7:29 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 7:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-09-11 7:51 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 7:41 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 8:03 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 8:41 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 17:47 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-13 21:47 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 16:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-14 17:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 17:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 18:10 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 18:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 20:51 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 21:04 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:14 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 7:53 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 8:33 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 8:39 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 16:23 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-09 5:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-10 16:18 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 16:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-18 18:18 ` Michael Snyder
2009-07-17 18:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 3:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ac60eac0908201340k6b759eb5o9bb73c8f473d8785@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox