Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ac60eac0907221110v6ac9bc32u4cb17765e2cb170e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0907221016j410f890ald54ac66c7c3291f9@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2783 bytes --]

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov<ppluzhnikov@google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Pedro Alves<pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
>> In the OBJF_USERLOADED case, you rebuild the map when you don't
>> really need to.
>
> I think it's pretty clear that what I really need is a new 'remove_objfile'
> kind of observer.

I am not thinking clearly today :-(

I don't need a new observer: free_objfile is in the same source, so I just
need to set the flag there as well.

>> You're also likely breaking xcoffsolib.c and the vmap code in exec.c, as
>> it calls free_objfile without going through observers.
>
> This would be handled by the 'remove_objfile' observer, I think.
>
>> Given the new_objfile observer, do we still need the exec_changed and
>> solib observers?
>
> No, I've removed that (new patch attached).

I feel going in circles here. The exec_changed observer was to address
reread_symbols, which doesn't create a new objfile. I believe that's
still necessary.

The solib_load/unload observers don't appear to be needed though: the load
case will create a new objfile, the unload case (when !OBJF_USERLOADED)
will do free_objfile).

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Pedro Alves<pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:

>> I think it's pretty clear that what I really need is a new 'remove_objfile'
>> kind of observer.
>
> Would setting objfiles_updated_p from e.g., unlink_objfile work?

Exactly. Though I think free_objfile is a more logical place for it.

> I think that the need for the solib load/unload observer
> would go away too if the map is flushed on objfile
> removal/freeing/unlinking as well?

Yes.

> Come to look at it deeper, what is happening with
> symbol_file_add_with_addrs_or_offsets, if the objfile has only
> minimal symbols (but still has sections)?  allocate_objfile is called,
> which builds the section table, but, there's a path that does an
> early return before calling the new_objfile observer, if there are
> no symbols.

That sounds like a bug: we created a new_objfile, but didn't notify
observers.

Eeasy enough to work around though: I'll set the flag in allocate_objfile
as well.

> It would be cleaner and easier to review, easier for you (I think),
> and better for the archives in the future, IMHO.  But I don't mind
> much if a new patch is cooked on top.

Let's try for one more fix before reverting ...

Re-tested on Linux/x86_64 with no new failures.

Thanks,
-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov

2009-07-22  Paul Pluzhnikov  <ppluzhnikov@google.com>

	* objfiles.c (allocate_objfile): Must rebuild section map.
	(free_objfile, objfile_relocate): Likewise.
	(set_objfiles_updated_on_solib_activity): Remove.
	(_initialize_objfiles): Adjust.

[-- Attachment #2: gdb-find_pc_section-20090722-3.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1766 bytes --]

Index: objfiles.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/objfiles.c,v
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -u -p -u -r1.86 objfiles.c
--- objfiles.c	21 Jul 2009 20:54:30 -0000	1.86
+++ objfiles.c	22 Jul 2009 17:55:41 -0000
@@ -235,6 +235,8 @@ allocate_objfile (bfd *abfd, int flags)
   /* Save passed in flag bits. */
   objfile->flags |= flags;
 
+  objfiles_updated_p = 1;  /* Rebuild section map next time we need it.  */
+
   return (objfile);
 }
 
@@ -501,6 +503,7 @@ free_objfile (struct objfile *objfile)
   obstack_free (&objfile->objfile_obstack, 0);
   xfree (objfile);
   objfile = NULL;
+  objfiles_updated_p = 1;  /* Rebuild section map next time we need it.  */
 }
 
 static void
@@ -682,6 +685,7 @@ objfile_relocate (struct objfile *objfil
 
   /* Relocate breakpoints as necessary, after things are relocated. */
   breakpoint_re_set ();
+  objfiles_updated_p = 1;  /* Rebuild section map next time we need it.  */
 }
 \f
 /* Many places in gdb want to test just to see if we have any partial
@@ -998,19 +1002,8 @@ set_objfiles_updated_on_exe_change (void
   objfiles_updated_p = 1;  /* Rebuild section map next time we need it.  */
 }
 
-/* Set objfiles_updated_p so section map will be rebuilt next time it
-   is used.  Called by solib_loaded/unloaded observer.  */
-
-static void
-set_objfiles_updated_on_solib_activity (struct so_list *so_list)
-{
-  objfiles_updated_p = 1;  /* Rebuild section map next time we need it.  */
-}
-
 void
 _initialize_objfiles (void)
 {
   observer_attach_executable_changed (set_objfiles_updated_on_exe_change);
-  observer_attach_solib_loaded (set_objfiles_updated_on_solib_activity);
-  observer_attach_solib_unloaded (set_objfiles_updated_on_solib_activity);
 }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-22 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-17  7:34 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 15:59 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 16:27 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-17 17:19   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 17:57     ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-21 20:51       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 21:03         ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 15:23         ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 16:33           ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 17:02             ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 17:02               ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 17:16                 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:08                   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:10                   ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 18:12                   ` Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2009-07-22 19:19                     ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 19:34                       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 19:54                         ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-17 21:15                         ` [commit] Fix reread_symbols crash (Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section) Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-04 14:22         ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Tom Tromey
2009-08-04 15:06           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-04 15:38             ` Tom Tromey
     [not found]               ` <8ac60eac0908042358q4d2061d2md3c49cf4aab26398@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                 ` <m34osmi5jx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
     [not found]                   ` <8ac60eac0908050940we3dc478rd182f4367a650f1b@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                     ` <8ac60eac0908052259l7b1c21d1t212991886a5f8b18@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                       ` <m3eirofxwh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
     [not found]                         ` <8ac60eac0908070030g7500a5ack3fcc81862e2a5b0a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-08-07 23:30                           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-09 21:37                             ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-10 18:09                               ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-10 20:39                                 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-17 19:45                               ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 19:57                                 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 22:55                                   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-18 13:48                                     ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 18:03                                       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 18:39                                         ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 21:06                                           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 22:34                                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-08-21 12:36                                             ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-23 23:25                                               ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26  7:21                                                 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 14:37                                                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-26 14:38                                                     ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 15:17                                                       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 23:45                                                       ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-27  2:56                                                         ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-02 17:02                                                   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 18:37                                                     ` What should we do re: "[patch] Speed up find_pc_section" Joel Brobecker
2009-09-08 20:16                                                       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 21:17                                                         ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09  5:58                                                   ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09  7:56                                                     ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-09 15:04                                                       ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11  7:44                                                         ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-10 17:36                                                     ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-10 18:30                                                       ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11  1:30                                                         ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11  6:51                                                           ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11  7:29                                                             ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11  7:40                                                               ` Mark Kettenis
2009-09-11  7:51                                                                 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11  7:41                                                               ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11  8:03                                                                 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11  8:41                                                                   ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 17:47                                                                     ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:15                                                                       ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-13 21:47                                                                         ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 16:43                                                                           ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-14 17:19                                                                             ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 17:36                                                                               ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 18:10                                                                                 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 18:21                                                                                   ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 20:51                                                               ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 21:04                                                                 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:14                                                                   ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11  7:53                                                       ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11  8:33                                                         ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11  8:39                                                           ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 16:23                                                             ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-09  5:39                                                 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-10 16:18                                                   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:06                                                     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 16:41                                                     ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-18 18:18                                     ` Michael Snyder
2009-07-17 18:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21  3:34   ` Paul Pluzhnikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ac60eac0907221110v6ac9bc32u4cb17765e2cb170e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox