From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ac60eac0907221110v6ac9bc32u4cb17765e2cb170e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0907221016j410f890ald54ac66c7c3291f9@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2783 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov<ppluzhnikov@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Pedro Alves<pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
>> In the OBJF_USERLOADED case, you rebuild the map when you don't
>> really need to.
>
> I think it's pretty clear that what I really need is a new 'remove_objfile'
> kind of observer.
I am not thinking clearly today :-(
I don't need a new observer: free_objfile is in the same source, so I just
need to set the flag there as well.
>> You're also likely breaking xcoffsolib.c and the vmap code in exec.c, as
>> it calls free_objfile without going through observers.
>
> This would be handled by the 'remove_objfile' observer, I think.
>
>> Given the new_objfile observer, do we still need the exec_changed and
>> solib observers?
>
> No, I've removed that (new patch attached).
I feel going in circles here. The exec_changed observer was to address
reread_symbols, which doesn't create a new objfile. I believe that's
still necessary.
The solib_load/unload observers don't appear to be needed though: the load
case will create a new objfile, the unload case (when !OBJF_USERLOADED)
will do free_objfile).
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Pedro Alves<pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> I think it's pretty clear that what I really need is a new 'remove_objfile'
>> kind of observer.
>
> Would setting objfiles_updated_p from e.g., unlink_objfile work?
Exactly. Though I think free_objfile is a more logical place for it.
> I think that the need for the solib load/unload observer
> would go away too if the map is flushed on objfile
> removal/freeing/unlinking as well?
Yes.
> Come to look at it deeper, what is happening with
> symbol_file_add_with_addrs_or_offsets, if the objfile has only
> minimal symbols (but still has sections)? allocate_objfile is called,
> which builds the section table, but, there's a path that does an
> early return before calling the new_objfile observer, if there are
> no symbols.
That sounds like a bug: we created a new_objfile, but didn't notify
observers.
Eeasy enough to work around though: I'll set the flag in allocate_objfile
as well.
> It would be cleaner and easier to review, easier for you (I think),
> and better for the archives in the future, IMHO. But I don't mind
> much if a new patch is cooked on top.
Let's try for one more fix before reverting ...
Re-tested on Linux/x86_64 with no new failures.
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
* objfiles.c (allocate_objfile): Must rebuild section map.
(free_objfile, objfile_relocate): Likewise.
(set_objfiles_updated_on_solib_activity): Remove.
(_initialize_objfiles): Adjust.
[-- Attachment #2: gdb-find_pc_section-20090722-3.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1766 bytes --]
Index: objfiles.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/objfiles.c,v
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -u -p -u -r1.86 objfiles.c
--- objfiles.c 21 Jul 2009 20:54:30 -0000 1.86
+++ objfiles.c 22 Jul 2009 17:55:41 -0000
@@ -235,6 +235,8 @@ allocate_objfile (bfd *abfd, int flags)
/* Save passed in flag bits. */
objfile->flags |= flags;
+ objfiles_updated_p = 1; /* Rebuild section map next time we need it. */
+
return (objfile);
}
@@ -501,6 +503,7 @@ free_objfile (struct objfile *objfile)
obstack_free (&objfile->objfile_obstack, 0);
xfree (objfile);
objfile = NULL;
+ objfiles_updated_p = 1; /* Rebuild section map next time we need it. */
}
static void
@@ -682,6 +685,7 @@ objfile_relocate (struct objfile *objfil
/* Relocate breakpoints as necessary, after things are relocated. */
breakpoint_re_set ();
+ objfiles_updated_p = 1; /* Rebuild section map next time we need it. */
}
\f
/* Many places in gdb want to test just to see if we have any partial
@@ -998,19 +1002,8 @@ set_objfiles_updated_on_exe_change (void
objfiles_updated_p = 1; /* Rebuild section map next time we need it. */
}
-/* Set objfiles_updated_p so section map will be rebuilt next time it
- is used. Called by solib_loaded/unloaded observer. */
-
-static void
-set_objfiles_updated_on_solib_activity (struct so_list *so_list)
-{
- objfiles_updated_p = 1; /* Rebuild section map next time we need it. */
-}
-
void
_initialize_objfiles (void)
{
observer_attach_executable_changed (set_objfiles_updated_on_exe_change);
- observer_attach_solib_loaded (set_objfiles_updated_on_solib_activity);
- observer_attach_solib_unloaded (set_objfiles_updated_on_solib_activity);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-22 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 7:34 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 15:59 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 16:27 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-17 17:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-21 20:51 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 21:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 15:23 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 16:33 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 17:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 17:02 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 17:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:08 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:10 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 18:12 ` Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2009-07-22 19:19 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 19:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 19:54 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-17 21:15 ` [commit] Fix reread_symbols crash (Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section) Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-04 14:22 ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Tom Tromey
2009-08-04 15:06 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-04 15:38 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908042358q4d2061d2md3c49cf4aab26398@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m34osmi5jx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908050940we3dc478rd182f4367a650f1b@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908052259l7b1c21d1t212991886a5f8b18@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m3eirofxwh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908070030g7500a5ack3fcc81862e2a5b0a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-08-07 23:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-09 21:37 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-10 18:09 ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-10 20:39 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-17 19:45 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 19:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 22:55 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-18 13:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 18:03 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 18:39 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 21:06 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 22:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-08-21 12:36 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-23 23:25 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 7:21 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 14:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-26 14:38 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 15:17 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 23:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-27 2:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-02 17:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 18:37 ` What should we do re: "[patch] Speed up find_pc_section" Joel Brobecker
2009-09-08 20:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 21:17 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09 5:58 ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09 7:56 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-09 15:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 7:44 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-10 17:36 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-10 18:30 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 1:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 6:51 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 7:29 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 7:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-09-11 7:51 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 7:41 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 8:03 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 8:41 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 17:47 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-13 21:47 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 16:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-14 17:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 17:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 18:10 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 18:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 20:51 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 21:04 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:14 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 7:53 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 8:33 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 8:39 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 16:23 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-09 5:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-10 16:18 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 16:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-18 18:18 ` Michael Snyder
2009-07-17 18:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 3:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ac60eac0907221110v6ac9bc32u4cb17765e2cb170e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox