From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090909055824.GB11738@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0908260020l4200cf84v2686a76b5858d13@mail.gmail.com>
> 2009-08-25 Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
>
> * objfiles.c (qsort_cmp): Remove asserts.
> (insert_section_p, filter_debuginfo_sections): New function.
> (filter_overlapping_sections): Likewise.
> (update_section_map): Adjust.
Looks good to me, save for the few little comments I wrote below.
Please wait until Friday to give Ulrich a chance to comment on this
patch, since he's been pretty involved in that discussion. But,
based on all the information you and him provided, I believe that
the patch incorporates all suggestions and should be correct.
> +/* Return 1 if SECTION should be inserted into the section map.
> + We want to insert only non-overlay and non-TLS section. */
Can you explain what we do not want to add TLS sections? Is that
just an optimization (code addresses should never point to TLS)?
> +/* Filter out overlapping sections where one section came from the real
> + objfile, and the other from a separate debuginfo file.
> + Return the size of table after redundant sections have been eliminated. */
> + if (sect1_addr == sect2_addr
> + && (objfile1->separate_debug_objfile == objfile2
> + || objfile2->separate_debug_objfile == objfile1))
Looks like "overlapping" above also means start at the same address?
Is that normal? Or good enough for our purpose?
> +/* Filter out overlapping sections, issuing a warning if any are found.
> + Overlapping sections could really be overlay sections which we didn't
> + classify as such in insert_section_p, or we could be dealing with a
> + corrupt binary. */
I think we should also mention the MacOS port where we load all sections
of all .o files instead of just the debugging info. It looks like a
design flaw in the MacOS port, but it was really a shortcut in getting
things to work (aka a hack). I believe Tristan is planning on fixing
this in the relatively near future, but in the meantime, it might be
a useful comment.
> + warning (_("Unexpected overlap between "
> + "section `%s' from `%s' [%s, %s) and "
> + "section `%s' from `%s' [%s, %s)"),
> + bfd_section_name (abfd1, bfds1), objf1->name,
> + paddress (gdbarch, sect1_addr),
> + paddress (gdbarch, sect1_endaddr),
> + bfd_section_name (abfd2, bfds2), objf2->name,
> + paddress (gdbarch, sect2_addr),
> + paddress (gdbarch, sect2_endaddr));
Let's please use a complaint rather than a warning. As explained in
one of my other messages, the warning causes too much output on MacOS.
But I also see, now, after reading Ulrich's messages, that he suggested
the same thing.
> /* Update PMAP, PMAP_SIZE with non-TLS sections from all objfiles. */
We should update the comment to explain that overlay sections are
also eliminated, as well as overlapping sections.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 7:34 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 15:59 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-17 16:27 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-17 17:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-21 20:51 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 21:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 15:23 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 16:33 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-22 17:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 17:02 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 17:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:08 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 18:10 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 18:12 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 19:19 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-22 19:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-22 19:54 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-17 21:15 ` [commit] Fix reread_symbols crash (Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section) Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-04 14:22 ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Tom Tromey
2009-08-04 15:06 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-04 15:38 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908042358q4d2061d2md3c49cf4aab26398@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m34osmi5jx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908050940we3dc478rd182f4367a650f1b@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908052259l7b1c21d1t212991886a5f8b18@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m3eirofxwh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0908070030g7500a5ack3fcc81862e2a5b0a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-08-07 23:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-09 21:37 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-10 18:09 ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-10 20:39 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-17 19:45 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 19:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-17 22:55 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-18 13:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 18:03 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 18:39 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-20 21:06 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-20 22:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-08-21 12:36 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-23 23:25 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 7:21 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 14:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-26 14:38 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 15:17 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-08-26 23:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-08-27 2:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-02 17:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 18:37 ` What should we do re: "[patch] Speed up find_pc_section" Joel Brobecker
2009-09-08 20:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-08 21:17 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-09 5:58 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2009-09-09 7:56 ` [patch] Speed up find_pc_section Tristan Gingold
2009-09-09 15:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 7:44 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-10 17:36 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-10 18:30 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 1:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 6:51 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 7:29 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 7:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-09-11 7:51 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 7:41 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 8:03 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 8:41 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-11 17:47 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-13 21:47 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 16:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-14 17:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 17:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 18:10 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 18:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-11 20:51 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 21:04 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:14 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 7:53 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 8:33 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 8:39 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-11 16:23 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-09 5:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-10 16:18 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-11 21:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 16:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-18 18:18 ` Michael Snyder
2009-07-17 18:56 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-07-21 3:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090909055824.GB11738@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox