From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [_Complex test 4/4 V3] _Complex tests in callfuncs.exp
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDB7B97.2090904@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201105240859.p4O8xH7Q019617@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
On 05/24/2011 04:59 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> > This is the version 3 of patch 4/4. In this version,
>> > setup_kfail_for_target is used to KFAIL the same fail to different PRs
>> > according to target triplet, same as what I did in patch 3/4.
> Can't you fold this behaviour into the normal setup_kfail?
I don't want to propagate this changes to setup_kfail in DejaGnu,
because I don't know how setup_kfail is used elsewhere. It is better to
keep setup_kfail_for_target local in GDB, IMO.
--
Yao (é½å°§)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-06 14:13 [patch, testsuite] Tests to _Complex type Yao Qi
2011-05-06 14:33 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-05-09 2:24 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-09 15:06 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-19 4:26 ` [_Complex test 1/4] support_complex_tests in gdb.exp and pass _Complex args to func Yao Qi
2011-05-19 8:16 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-05-19 10:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-05-19 13:26 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-19 17:10 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-20 8:10 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-26 17:07 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-30 2:53 ` [committed] " Yao Qi
2011-05-19 13:01 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-19 13:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-05-19 13:38 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-05-19 10:12 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-05-19 4:34 ` [_Complex test 2/4] _Complex type in varargs.exp Yao Qi
2011-05-19 10:13 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-05-19 13:42 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-19 15:27 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-05-20 9:09 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-20 15:22 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-20 15:37 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-23 4:09 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-23 10:27 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-30 2:55 ` [committed] " Yao Qi
2011-05-19 17:12 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-20 8:11 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-19 4:46 ` [_Complex test 3/4] Isolate each test's effect in callfuncs.exp Yao Qi
2011-05-19 18:46 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-30 2:56 ` [committed] " Yao Qi
2011-05-19 5:09 ` [_Complex test 4/4] _Complex tests " Yao Qi
2011-05-20 8:17 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-24 1:46 ` [_Complex test 4/4 V3] " Yao Qi
2011-05-24 9:00 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-05-24 9:34 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2011-05-24 10:00 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-05-24 13:54 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-26 17:07 ` [_Complex test 4/4] " Tom Tromey
2011-05-30 2:57 ` [committed] " Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDB7B97.2090904@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox