Re: [_Complex test 1/4] support_complex_tests in gdb.exp and pass _Complex args to func

[Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>]

>>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> writes:

Yao> This is a good idea.  Done this in new patch.

Thanks for doing this.

Yao> +#ifdef PROTOTYPES
Yao> +void callca (float _Complex f1, float _Complex f2, float _Complex f3)
Yao> +#else
Yao> +callca (f1, f2, f3)
Yao> +float _Complex f1; float _Complex f2; float _Complex f3;
Yao> +#endif

I would not worry about the no PROTOTYPES case.  You can leave this in
if you want though.

Yao> +set compile_flags {debug nowarnings quiet}
Yao> +if [support_complex_tests] {
Yao> +    set compile_flags "$compile_flags additional_flags=-DTEST_COMPLEX"

I think it is better to use lappend here.

Yao> +    gdb_breakpoint callca;
Yao> +    gdb_breakpoint callcb;
Yao> +    gdb_breakpoint callcc;
Yao> +    gdb_breakpoint callcd;
Yao> +    gdb_breakpoint callce;
Yao> +    gdb_breakpoint callcf;

These ";"s are not needed.  There are a few instances of this.

Yao> +# Return a 1 if we should run tests to _Complex types, otherwise, skip it.

Just "Return 1 if...", and then ", otherwise 0.".

I am curious if you tested this in some situation where the complex
tests are skipped.

Tom