From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-81243-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14332 invoked by alias); 24 May 2011 09:34:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 14047 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2011 09:34:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:34:26 +0000
Received: (qmail 15652 invoked from network); 24 May 2011 09:34:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.102?) (yao@127.0.0.2)  by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 24 May 2011 09:34:25 -0000
Message-ID: <4DDB7B97.2090904@codesourcery.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:34:00 -0000
From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [_Complex test 4/4 V3] _Complex tests in callfuncs.exp
References: <4DC401D0.1050500@codesourcery.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1105061426440.8538@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<4DC75036.4040806@codesourcery.com> <m3oc3bud5j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4DD4A5DC.9060004@codesourcery.com> <4DD6238D.40501@codesourcery.com> <4DDB0DC6.9050200@codesourcery.com> <201105240859.p4O8xH7Q019617@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <201105240859.p4O8xH7Q019617@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00554.txt.bz2

On 05/24/2011 04:59 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> > This is the version 3 of patch 4/4.  In this version,
>> > setup_kfail_for_target is used to KFAIL the same fail to different PRs
>> > according to target triplet, same as what I did in patch 3/4.
> Can't you fold this behaviour into the normal setup_kfail?

I don't want to propagate this changes to setup_kfail in DejaGnu,
because I don't know how setup_kfail is used elsewhere.  It is better to
keep setup_kfail_for_target local in GDB, IMO.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)