gdb.c++ vs dos names

gdb.c++ vs dos names

[Andrew Cagney]

David, Michael,

The ARI is tossing up some name problems for GDB's [c++] testsuite 
directory.  One has me puzzled:

testsuite/gdb.c++/Makefile

I suspect that the new makefile stuff is forgetting to clean it up after 
a configure?  (The script is run over a release, and not the files 
checked out of CVS).

Andrew

Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[David Carlton]

On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 11:22:04 -0500, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:

> The ARI is tossing up some name problems for GDB's [c++] testsuite
> directory.  One has me puzzled:

> testsuite/gdb.c++/Makefile

> I suspect that the new makefile stuff is forgetting to clean it up
> after a configure?  (The script is run over a release, and not the
> files checked out of CVS).

Beats me.  The recent flurry of small configure changes did affect the
way configure was run in the testsuite, but I don't see why that would
matter here: why would the release contain a Makefile at all?  I
assume that these are produced by something involving 'make
distclean', which looks to me like it should get rid of it.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu

Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[David Carlton]

On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 11:22:04 -0500, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:

> The ARI is tossing up some name problems for GDB's [c++] testsuite
> directory.  One has me puzzled:

> testsuite/gdb.c++/Makefile

> I suspect that the new makefile stuff is forgetting to clean it up
> after a configure?  (The script is run over a release, and not the
> files checked out of CVS).

After my last response, I just noticed something: the Makefile in
testsuite lists only gdb.stabs in SUBDIRS, so 'make distclean' doesn't
descend into all of the directories.  Maybe that's where the problem
is.  I have to run and teach a class now, else I'd investigate
further.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu

Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:45:12 -0600
> From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
> 
> If you look in config/djgpp/fnchange.lst, every file in
> testsuite/gdb.c++ is in there.  I presume it's because of the gdb.c++.

Yes, that's the reason.

Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

It seems to work for me.  'make -f src-release gdb.tar' gives
me a tarball with no testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile in it.

Two directories still have both a 'Makefile' and 'Makefile.in'
in the tarball:

  % tar tf gdb.tar | grep Makefile
  ...
  utils/sparclite/Makefile.in
  utils/sparclite/Makefile
  ...
  utils/wince/Makefile.in
  utils/wince/Makefile
  ...

utils/configure.in does not use AC_OUTPUT so there is some other glitch.
This is probably a bug as the generated Makefile has had all its
variables substituted by the release process.

config/djgpp/fnchange.lst is still missing some legitimate files
in gdb.c++.  I will submit a patch for that shortly.

Michael C

===

2003-01-09  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>

	* Makefile.in (ALL_SUBDIRS): New variable.
	(subdirs, clean, distclean): Use it.
	* gdb.arch/Makefile.in: Clean up Makefile.  Remove rules for
	regenerating Makefile, since it is generated from the top level.
	* gdb.asm/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.base/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.c++/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.disasm/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.java/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.mi/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.threads/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.trace/Makefile.in: Likewise.

Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[Andrew Cagney]

> Once spotted, easily corrected.  Thanks for all the digging.  A couple
>> of other things in here need to be fixed up to; give me a couple of
>> minutes.
> 
> 
> Fixed, as so.  We could eliminate a lot of these Makefiles; I'll keep
> that in mind for a rainy day.

Thanks,
Andrew

Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:23:23PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:52:13AM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> > Michael C lies:
> > > Well, the snapshot tarball has testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile files in it,
> > > thus there are 8.3 conflicts in every testsuite directory.
> > 
> > Whoops, that is a lie, I was sloppy.  David C has a very good point
> > about gdb.hp/gdb.stabs.
> > 
> > In the snapshot tarball gdb/testsuite has these subdirectories:
> > 
> >   gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.hp gdb.java gdb.mi
> >   gdb.stabs gdb.threads gdb.trace
> > 
> > These subdirectories have 'Makefile' files:
> > 
> >   gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.java gdb.mi gdb.threads
> >   gdb.trace
> > 
> > The difference is gdb.hp and gdb.stabs.  configure.in handles these
> > as conditionally set 'configdirs'.  All the other testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile
> > files are produced by an AC_OUTPUT line.
> 
> Once spotted, easily corrected.  Thanks for all the digging.  A couple
> of other things in here need to be fixed up to; give me a couple of
> minutes.

Fixed, as so.  We could eliminate a lot of these Makefiles; I'll keep
that in mind for a rainy day.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

2003-01-09  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>

	* Makefile.in (ALL_SUBDIRS): New variable.
	(subdirs, clean, distclean): Use it.
	* gdb.arch/Makefile.in: Clean up Makefile.  Remove rules for
	regenerating Makefile, since it is generated from the top level.
	* gdb.asm/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.base/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.c++/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.disasm/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.java/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.mi/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.threads/Makefile.in: Likewise.
	* gdb.trace/Makefile.in: Likewise.

Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in	1 Aug 2002 17:18:35 -0000	1.4
+++ Makefile.in	9 Jan 2003 17:59:14 -0000
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ SHELL = @SHELL@
 EXEEXT = @EXEEXT@
 SUBDIRS = @subdirs@
 RPATH_ENVVAR = @RPATH_ENVVAR@
+ALL_SUBDIRS = gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.java gdb.mi \
+	gdb.threads gdb.trace $(SUBDIRS)
 
 EXPECT = `if [ -f $${rootme}/../../expect/expect ] ; then \
           echo $${rootme}/../../expect/expect ; \
@@ -145,7 +147,7 @@ subdir_do: force
 force:;
 
 subdirs:
-	for dir in ${SUBDIRS} ; \
+	for dir in ${ALL_SUBDIRS} ; \
 	do \
 		echo "$$dir:" ; \
 		if [ -d $$dir ] ; then \
@@ -157,8 +159,8 @@ subdirs:
 
 clean mostlyclean:
 	-rm -f *~ core *.o a.out xgdb *.x *.grt
-	if [ x"${SUBDIRS}" != x ] ; then \
-	    for dir in ${SUBDIRS}; \
+	if [ x"${ALL_SUBDIRS}" != x ] ; then \
+	    for dir in ${ALL_SUBDIRS}; \
 	    do \
 		    echo "$$dir:"; \
 		    if [ -d $$dir ]; then \
@@ -171,8 +173,8 @@ distclean maintainer-clean realclean: cl
 	-rm -f *~ core
 	-rm -f Makefile config.status *-init.exp
 	-rm -fr *.log summary detail *.plog *.sum *.psum site.*
-	if [ x"${SUBDIRS}" != x ] ; then \
-	    for dir in ${SUBDIRS}; \
+	if [ x"${ALL_SUBDIRS}" != x ] ; then \
+	    for dir in ${ALL_SUBDIRS}; \
 	    do \
 		    echo "$$dir:"; \
 		    if [ -d $$dir ]; then \
Index: gdb.arch/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 Makefile.in
--- gdb.arch/Makefile.in	14 May 2002 17:09:13 -0000	1.1
+++ gdb.arch/Makefile.in	9 Jan 2003 18:37:27 -0000
@@ -5,16 +5,8 @@ EXECUTABLES = altivec-abi altivec-regs
 
 MISCELLANEOUS =
 
-all:
-	@echo "Nothing to be done for all..."
-
-info:
-install-info:
-dvi:
-install:
-uninstall: force
-installcheck:
-check:
+all info install-info dvi install uninstall installcheck check:
+	@echo "Nothing to be done for $@..."
 
 clean mostlyclean:
 	-rm -f *~ *.o a.out *.x *.ci *.tmp
@@ -26,6 +18,3 @@ distclean maintainer-clean realclean: cl
 	-rm -f Makefile config.status config.log
 	-rm -f *-init.exp
 	-rm -fr *.log summary detail *.plog *.sum *.psum site.*
-
-Makefile : $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(srcdir)/configure.in
-	$(SHELL) ./config.status --recheck
Index: gdb.asm/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.asm/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 Makefile.in
--- gdb.asm/Makefile.in	5 Apr 2002 02:48:23 -0000	1.2
+++ gdb.asm/Makefile.in	9 Jan 2003 18:37:27 -0000
@@ -2,35 +2,18 @@ VPATH = @srcdir@
 srcdir = @srcdir@
 
 EXECUTABLES =
+MISCELLANEOUS = arch.inc
 
-# uuencoded format to avoid SCCS/RCS problems with binary files.
-CROSS_EXECUTABLES =
-
-all:
-	@echo "Nothing to be done for all..."
-
-info:
-install-info:
-dvi:
-install:
-uninstall: force
-installcheck:
-check:
+all info install-info dvi install uninstall installcheck check:
+	@echo "Nothing to be done for $@..."
 
 clean mostlyclean:
-	-rm -f *~ *.o a.out xgdb *.x $(CROSS_EXECUTABLES) *.ci *.tmp
+	-rm -f *~ *.o a.out *.x *.ci *.tmp
 	-rm -f core core.coremaker coremaker.core corefile $(EXECUTABLES)
-	-rm -f twice-tmp.c
+	-rm -f $(MISCELLANEOUS)
 
 distclean maintainer-clean realclean: clean
 	-rm -f *~ core
 	-rm -f Makefile config.status config.log
-	-rm -f arch.inc
 	-rm -f *-init.exp
 	-rm -fr *.log summary detail *.plog *.sum *.psum site.*
-
-Makefile : $(srcdir)/Makefile.in config.status
-	$(SHELL) ./config.status
-
-config.status: $(srcdir)/configure
-	$(SHELL) ./config.status --recheck
Index: gdb.base/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 Makefile.in
--- gdb.base/Makefile.in	27 Mar 2001 01:32:45 -0000	1.2
+++ gdb.base/Makefile.in	9 Jan 2003 18:37:27 -0000
@@ -17,16 +17,8 @@ EXECUTABLES = all-types annota1 bitfield
 MISCELLANEOUS = coremmap.data ../foobar.baz \
 	shr1.sl shr2.sl solib_sl.sl solib1.sl solib2.sl
 
-all:
-	@echo "Nothing to be done for all..."
-
-info:
-install-info:
-dvi:
-install:
-uninstall: force
-installcheck:
-check:
+all info install-info dvi install uninstall installcheck check:
+	@echo "Nothing to be done for $@..."
 
 clean mostlyclean:
 	-rm -f *~ *.o a.out xgdb *.x *.ci *.tmp
@@ -38,6 +30,3 @@ distclean maintainer-clean realclean: cl
 	-rm -f Makefile config.status config.log
 	-rm -f *-init.exp
 	-rm -fr *.log summary detail *.plog *.sum *.psum site.*
-
-Makefile : $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(srcdir)/configure.in
-	$(SHELL) ./config.status --recheck
Index: gdb.c++/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 Makefile.in
--- gdb.c++/Makefile.in	12 Jun 2000 01:31:41 -0000	1.3
+++ gdb.c++/Makefile.in	9 Jan 2003 18:37:27 -0000
@@ -5,16 +5,8 @@ EXECUTABLES = ambiguous annota2 anon-uni
 	derivation inherit local member-ptr method misc \
         overload ovldbreak ref-typ ref-typ2 templates userdef virtfunc namespace ref-types
 
-all: 
-	@echo "Nothing to be done for all..."
-
-info:
-install-info:
-dvi:
-install:
-uninstall: force
-installcheck:
-check:
+all info install-info dvi install uninstall installcheck check:
+	@echo "Nothing to be done for $@..."
 
 clean mostlyclean:
 	-rm -f *~ *.o *.ci
@@ -22,6 +14,3 @@ clean mostlyclean:
 
 distclean maintainer-clean realclean: clean
 	-rm -f Makefile config.status config.log
-
-Makefile: $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(srcdir)/configure.in
-	$(SHELL) ./config.status --recheck
Index: gdb.disasm/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.disasm/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 Makefile.in
--- gdb.disasm/Makefile.in	28 Jun 2001 22:01:22 -0000	1.2
+++ gdb.disasm/Makefile.in	9 Jan 2003 18:37:27 -0000
@@ -1,18 +1,13 @@
-#### host, target, and site specific Makefile frags come in here.
-
 VPATH = @srcdir@
 srcdir = @srcdir@
 
 .PHONY: all clean mostlyclean distclean realclean
 
-all: 
-	@echo "Nothing to be done for all..."	
+all info install-info dvi install uninstall installcheck check:
+	@echo "Nothing to be done for $@..."
 
 clean mostlyclean:
 	-rm -f *.o *.diff *~ *.bad core h8300s hppa mn10200 mn10300 sh3
 
 distclean maintainer-clean realclean: clean
 	-rm -f Makefile config.status config.log
-
-Makefile: $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(srcdir)/configure.in
-	$(SHELL) ./config.status --recheck
Index: gdb.java/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.java/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 Makefile.in
--- gdb.java/Makefile.in	24 Jul 2000 04:34:52 -0000	1.1
+++ gdb.java/Makefile.in	9 Jan 2003 18:37:27 -0000
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
 srcdir = @srcdir@
 VPATH = @srcdir@
 
-all: 
-	@echo "Nothing to be done for all..."
-
-#### host, target, and site specific Makefile frags come in here.
+all info install-info dvi install uninstall installcheck check:
+	@echo "Nothing to be done for $@..."
 
 .SUFFIXES: .java .class .o .exe .exp .check
 
@@ -21,6 +19,3 @@ clean mostlyclean:
 
 distclean maintainer-clean realclean: clean
 	-rm -f Makefile config.status config.log
-
-Makefile: $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(srcdir)/configure.in
-	$(SHELL) ./config.status --recheck
Index: gdb.mi/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 Makefile.in
--- gdb.mi/Makefile.in	18 Apr 2000 08:03:40 -0000	1.3
+++ gdb.mi/Makefile.in	9 Jan 2003 18:37:27 -0000
@@ -5,20 +5,11 @@ PROGS = basics c_variable cpp_variable v
 
 MISCELLANEOUS = testcmds
 
-all: 
-	@echo "Nothing to be done for all..."
-
-#### host, target, and site specific Makefile frags come in here.
+all info install-info dvi install uninstall installcheck check:
+	@echo "Nothing to be done for $@..."
 
 clean mostlyclean:
 	-rm -f *.ci *.o $(OBJS) $(PROGS) *~ core
 
 distclean maintainer-clean realclean: clean
 	-rm -f Makefile config.status config.log
-
-Makefile: $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(srcdir)/configure.in
-	$(SHELL) ./config.status --recheck
-
-# Local variables: 
-# change-log-default-name: "ChangeLog-mi"
-# End: 
Index: gdb.threads/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 Makefile.in
--- gdb.threads/Makefile.in	16 Apr 1999 01:34:36 -0000	1.1.1.1
+++ gdb.threads/Makefile.in	9 Jan 2003 18:37:27 -0000
@@ -3,29 +3,11 @@ srcdir = @srcdir@
 
 EXECUTABLES = pthreads
 
-all:
-	@echo "Nothing to be done for all..."
-
-info:
-install-info:
-dvi:
-install:
-uninstall: force
-installcheck:
-check:
+all info install-info dvi install uninstall installcheck check:
+	@echo "Nothing to be done for $@..."
 
 clean mostlyclean:
 	-rm -f *~ *.o a.out xgdb *.x *.ci *.tmp core* $(EXECUTABLES)
 
 distclean maintainer-clean realclean: clean
 	-rm -f Makefile config.status config.log config.h
-
-Makefile : $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(srcdir)/configure.in
-	$(SHELL) ./config.status --recheck
-
-config.h: stamp-h ; @true
-stamp-h: config.in config.status
-	CONFIG_HEADERS=config.h:config.in $(SHELL) config.status
-
-config.status: configure
-	$(SHELL) config.status --recheck
Index: gdb.trace/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 Makefile.in
--- gdb.trace/Makefile.in	16 Apr 1999 01:34:36 -0000	1.1.1.1
+++ gdb.trace/Makefile.in	9 Jan 2003 18:37:27 -0000
@@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
-#### host, target, and site specific Makefile frags come in here.
-
 VPATH = @srcdir@
 srcdir = @srcdir@
 
 .PHONY: all clean mostlyclean distclean realclean
 
-all: 
-	@echo "Nothing to be done for all..."	
+all info install-info dvi install uninstall installcheck check:
+	@echo "Nothing to be done for $@..."
 
 clean mostlyclean:
 	-rm -f actions circ collection limits
@@ -14,8 +12,3 @@ clean mostlyclean:
 
 distclean maintainer-clean realclean: clean
 	-rm -f Makefile config.status config.log
-
-Makefile: $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(srcdir)/configure.in
-	$(SHELL) ./config.status --recheck
-
-

Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:52:13AM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> Michael C lies:
> > Well, the snapshot tarball has testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile files in it,
> > thus there are 8.3 conflicts in every testsuite directory.
> 
> Whoops, that is a lie, I was sloppy.  David C has a very good point
> about gdb.hp/gdb.stabs.
> 
> In the snapshot tarball gdb/testsuite has these subdirectories:
> 
>   gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.hp gdb.java gdb.mi
>   gdb.stabs gdb.threads gdb.trace
> 
> These subdirectories have 'Makefile' files:
> 
>   gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.java gdb.mi gdb.threads
>   gdb.trace
> 
> The difference is gdb.hp and gdb.stabs.  configure.in handles these
> as conditionally set 'configdirs'.  All the other testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile
> files are produced by an AC_OUTPUT line.

Once spotted, easily corrected.  Thanks for all the digging.  A couple
of other things in here need to be fixed up to; give me a couple of
minutes.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

Michael C lies:
> Well, the snapshot tarball has testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile files in it,
> thus there are 8.3 conflicts in every testsuite directory.

Whoops, that is a lie, I was sloppy.  David C has a very good point
about gdb.hp/gdb.stabs.

In the snapshot tarball gdb/testsuite has these subdirectories:

  gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.hp gdb.java gdb.mi
  gdb.stabs gdb.threads gdb.trace

These subdirectories have 'Makefile' files:

  gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.java gdb.mi gdb.threads
  gdb.trace

The difference is gdb.hp and gdb.stabs.  configure.in handles these
as conditionally set 'configdirs'.  All the other testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile
files are produced by an AC_OUTPUT line.

Michael C

Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

Well, the snapshot tarball has testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile files in it,
thus there are 8.3 conflicts in every testsuite directory.  We're just
lucky that ARI saw a problem with gdb.c++/Makefile because of the
gdb.c++ part.

I can't read the script that makes the snapshot tarballs,
so I can't go any further.

. doc/gdbint.texinfo is out of date

  . "make -f Makefile.in gdb.tar.gz" does not work now that
    Makefile.in is autogen'ed, because it has plenty of @foo@ magic.

  . "configure ; make gdb.tar.gz" fails because the top Makefile
    no longer has any rules to make gdb.tar.gz or gdb.tar.

. gdbadmin is not accessible to me

  . http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current has instructions for getting
    the administration scripts, but they are not working

    . checkout as anoncvs fails:

      bash-2.05b$ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/gdbadmin login
      Logging in to :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:2401/cvs/gdbadmin
      CVS password:
      bash-2.05b$ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/gdbadmin co .
      cvs server: Updating .
      cvs server: failed to create lock directory for `/cvs/gdbadmin' (/cvs/gdbadmin/#cvs.lock): Permission denied
      cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/cvs/gdbadmin'
      cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up

    . checkout with my gdb developer identity fails:

      bash-2.05b$ cvs -z9 -d :ext:chastain@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/gdbadmin co .
      Enter passphrase for RSA key '/berman/home/mec/.ssh/identity':
      Warning: Remote host denied authentication agent forwarding.
      cvs server: Updating .
      cvs server: failed to create lock directory for `/cvs/gdbadmin' (/cvs/gdbadmin/#cvs.lock): Permission denied
      cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/cvs/gdbadmin'
      cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up

These are doco and web bugs.  Which of them would you like me to
file PR's on?

Michael C

Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

If you look in config/djgpp/fnchange.lst, every file in
testsuite/gdb.c++ is in there.  I presume it's because of the gdb.c++.
All the new files like pr-574.exp need to be registered.

But I'm looking at my source+build directories for gcc_5_3-branch and
HEAD and I don't see any difference with 'Makefile.in' and 'Makefile'.

In both branch and trunk:

  source dir for testsuite/gdb.c++ has a 'Makefile.in'
  build dir for testsuite/gdb.c++ has a 'Makefile'

So I don't know why ari.doschk.bug has this for message for HEAD
and does not have it for gcc_5_3_branch.

Andrew C:
> I suspect that the new makefile stuff is forgetting to clean it up after 
> a configure?  (The script is run over a release, and not the files 
> checked out of CVS).

Ermmm, it looks like an interaction between new makefile stuff and the
release process, neither of which I know very well.

Michael C