Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:52:13AM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> Michael C lies:
> > Well, the snapshot tarball has testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile files in it,
> > thus there are 8.3 conflicts in every testsuite directory.
> 
> Whoops, that is a lie, I was sloppy.  David C has a very good point
> about gdb.hp/gdb.stabs.
> 
> In the snapshot tarball gdb/testsuite has these subdirectories:
> 
>   gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.hp gdb.java gdb.mi
>   gdb.stabs gdb.threads gdb.trace
> 
> These subdirectories have 'Makefile' files:
> 
>   gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.java gdb.mi gdb.threads
>   gdb.trace
> 
> The difference is gdb.hp and gdb.stabs.  configure.in handles these
> as conditionally set 'configdirs'.  All the other testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile
> files are produced by an AC_OUTPUT line.

Once spotted, easily corrected.  Thanks for all the digging.  A couple
of other things in here need to be fixed up to; give me a couple of
minutes.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer