From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 6740 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2003 18:23:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2003 18:23:27 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18WjDH-0002Q9-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 14:23:39 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18WhKt-0007WX-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 13:23:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 18:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, carlton@math.stanford.edu, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names Message-ID: <20030109182323.GA27694@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ac131313@redhat.com, carlton@math.stanford.edu, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200301091752.h09HqDL03494@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200301091752.h09HqDL03494@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00371.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:52:13AM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > Michael C lies: > > Well, the snapshot tarball has testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile files in it, > > thus there are 8.3 conflicts in every testsuite directory. > > Whoops, that is a lie, I was sloppy. David C has a very good point > about gdb.hp/gdb.stabs. > > In the snapshot tarball gdb/testsuite has these subdirectories: > > gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.hp gdb.java gdb.mi > gdb.stabs gdb.threads gdb.trace > > These subdirectories have 'Makefile' files: > > gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.java gdb.mi gdb.threads > gdb.trace > > The difference is gdb.hp and gdb.stabs. configure.in handles these > as conditionally set 'configdirs'. All the other testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile > files are produced by an AC_OUTPUT line. Once spotted, easily corrected. Thanks for all the digging. A couple of other things in here need to be fixed up to; give me a couple of minutes. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer