From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 860 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2003 17:24:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2003 17:24:29 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h09HOBw16752; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 09:24:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names References: <3E1DA1AC.9000302@redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 17:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3E1DA1AC.9000302@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00365.txt.bz2 On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 11:22:04 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: > The ARI is tossing up some name problems for GDB's [c++] testsuite > directory. One has me puzzled: > testsuite/gdb.c++/Makefile > I suspect that the new makefile stuff is forgetting to clean it up > after a configure? (The script is run over a release, and not the > files checked out of CVS). Beats me. The recent flurry of small configure changes did affect the way configure was run in the testsuite, but I don't see why that would matter here: why would the release contain a Makefile at all? I assume that these are produced by something involving 'make distclean', which looks to me like it should get rid of it. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu