From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <halo1@zahav.net.il>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Received: (qmail 5286 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2003 20:22:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2003 20:22:37 -0000
Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.85.156])
	by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA)
	with ESMTP id ACK66218;
	Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:21:35 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:22:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: mec@shout.net
Message-Id: <2427-Fri10Jan2003221837+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
CC: ac131313@redhat.com, carlton@math.stanford.edu,
        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <200301091645.h09GjCw02160@duracef.shout.net> (message from
	Michael Elizabeth Chastain on Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:45:12 -0600)
Subject: Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References:  <200301091645.h09GjCw02160@duracef.shout.net>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:45:12 -0600
> From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
> 
> If you look in config/djgpp/fnchange.lst, every file in
> testsuite/gdb.c++ is in there.  I presume it's because of the gdb.c++.

Yes, that's the reason.