From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 21838 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2003 16:22:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2003 16:22:14 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5683EC2; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 11:22:04 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E1DA1AC.9000302@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 16:22:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlton , Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: gdb.c++ vs dos names Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00362.txt.bz2 David, Michael, The ARI is tossing up some name problems for GDB's [c++] testsuite directory. One has me puzzled: testsuite/gdb.c++/Makefile I suspect that the new makefile stuff is forgetting to clean it up after a configure? (The script is run over a release, and not the files checked out of CVS). Andrew