From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mec@shout.net>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Received: (qmail 19820 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2003 17:52:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2003 17:52:27 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h09HqDL03494;
	Thu, 9 Jan 2003 11:52:13 -0600
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 17:52:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200301091752.h09HqDL03494@duracef.shout.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com, carlton@math.stanford.edu, mec@shout.net
Subject: Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00369.txt.bz2

Michael C lies:
> Well, the snapshot tarball has testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile files in it,
> thus there are 8.3 conflicts in every testsuite directory.

Whoops, that is a lie, I was sloppy.  David C has a very good point
about gdb.hp/gdb.stabs.

In the snapshot tarball gdb/testsuite has these subdirectories:

  gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.hp gdb.java gdb.mi
  gdb.stabs gdb.threads gdb.trace

These subdirectories have 'Makefile' files:

  gdb.arch gdb.asm gdb.base gdb.c++ gdb.disasm gdb.java gdb.mi gdb.threads
  gdb.trace

The difference is gdb.hp and gdb.stabs.  configure.in handles these
as conditionally set 'configdirs'.  All the other testsuite/gdb.*/Makefile
files are produced by an AC_OUTPUT line.

Michael C