* [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers
@ 2002-08-10 16:58 Andrew Cagney
2002-08-12 11:10 ` Mark Kettenis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-08-10 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 419 bytes --]
Hello,
This adds mmx registers to the i386.
Several notes:
It depends on an earlier patch I submitted that eliminates
register_byte() and register_raw_size() from the i386.
It probably works better if the ``info vector'' command is added.
If someone has a bit of code for testing this, I'm most interested. I
think its correct :-)
Assuming I've got it right ..., yes, it is that easy :-)
comments? ok?
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4078 bytes --]
2002-08-10 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* i386-tdep.h (i386_register_byte, i386_register_raw_size): Delete
declarations.
* i386-tdep.c (i386_register_name): Handle mmx registers.
(is_mmx_regnum): New function.
(i386_mmx_names): New array.
(nr_mmx_regs): New variable.
(i386_pseudo_register_read): New function.
(i386_pseudo_register_write): New function.
(mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum): New function. Code from Fernando Nasser.
diff --exclude *CVS* --exclude *#* --exclude *~* --exclude *%* --exclude *.orig --exclude *.rej --exclude *diffs --exclude new-* --exclude old-* --exclude *-new --exclude *-old -u /home/cagney/2002-08-09-p4-cleanup/src/gdb/i386-tdep.c ./i386-tdep.c
--- /home/cagney/2002-08-09-p4-cleanup/src/gdb/i386-tdep.c Fri Aug 9 20:44:31 2002
+++ ./i386-tdep.c Sat Aug 10 02:02:14 2002
@@ -56,6 +56,23 @@
"mxcsr"
};
+/* MMX registers. */
+
+static char *i386_mmx_names[] =
+{
+ "mm0", "mm1", "mm2", "mm3",
+ "mm4", "mm5", "mm6", "mm7"
+};
+static const int nr_mmx_regs = (sizeof (i386_mmx_names)
+ / sizeof (i386_mmx_names[0]));
+#define MM0_REGNUM (NUM_REGS)
+
+static int
+is_mmx_regnum (int reg)
+{
+ return (reg >= MM0_REGNUM && reg < MM0_REGNUM + nr_mmx_regs);
+}
+
/* Return the name of register REG. */
const char *
@@ -63,9 +80,10 @@
{
if (reg < 0)
return NULL;
+ if (is_mmx_regnum (reg))
+ return i386_mmx_names[reg - MM0_REGNUM];
if (reg >= sizeof (i386_register_names) / sizeof (*i386_register_names))
return NULL;
-
return i386_register_names[reg];
}
@@ -1079,9 +1097,60 @@
if (IS_SSE_REGNUM (regnum))
return builtin_type_vec128i;
+ if (is_mmx_regnum (regnum))
+ return builtin_type_vec64i;
+
return builtin_type_int;
}
+/* Map a cooked register onto a raw register or memory. For the i386,
+ the MMX registers need to be mapped onto floating point registers. */
+
+static int
+mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum)
+{
+ int mmxi = regnum - MM0_REGNUM;
+ int fstat = regcache_raw_read_as_address (regcache, FSTAT_REGNUM);
+ int tos = (fstat >> 11) & 0x7;
+ int fpi = (mmxi + tos) % 8;
+ return FP0_REGNUM + fpi;
+}
+
+static void
+i386_pseudo_register_read (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct regcache *regcache,
+ int regnum, void *buf)
+{
+ if (is_mmx_regnum (regnum))
+ {
+ char *mmx_buf = alloca (MAX_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE);
+ int fpnum = mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum (regcache, regnum);
+ regcache_raw_read (regcache, fpnum, mmx_buf);
+ /* Extract (always little endian). */
+ memcpy (buf, mmx_buf, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum));
+ }
+ else
+ regcache_raw_read (regcache, regnum, buf);
+}
+
+static void
+i386_pseudo_register_write (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct regcache *regcache,
+ int regnum, const void *buf)
+{
+ if (is_mmx_regnum (regnum))
+ {
+ char *mmx_buf = alloca (MAX_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE);
+ int fpnum = mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum (regcache, regnum);
+ /* Read ... */
+ regcache_raw_read (regcache, fpnum, mmx_buf);
+ /* ... Modify ... (always little endian). */
+ memcpy (mmx_buf, buf, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum));
+ /* ... Write. */
+ regcache_raw_write (regcache, fpnum, mmx_buf);
+ }
+ else
+ regcache_raw_write (regcache, regnum, buf);
+}
+
/* Return true iff register REGNUM's virtual format is different from
its raw format. Note that this definition assumes that the host
supports IEEE 32-bit floats, since it doesn't say that SSE
@@ -1474,6 +1543,11 @@
set_gdbarch_saved_pc_after_call (gdbarch, i386_saved_pc_after_call);
set_gdbarch_frame_num_args (gdbarch, i386_frame_num_args);
set_gdbarch_pc_in_sigtramp (gdbarch, i386_pc_in_sigtramp);
+
+ /* Wire in the MMX registers. */
+ set_gdbarch_num_pseudo_regs (gdbarch, nr_mmx_regs);
+ set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_read);
+ set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_write (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_write);
/* Hook in ABI-specific overrides, if they have been registered. */
gdbarch_init_osabi (info, gdbarch, osabi);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers
2002-08-10 16:58 [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-08-12 11:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-08-12 12:00 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2002-08-12 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> This adds mmx registers to the i386.
Great, a few nits though :-(
* Please rename is_mmx_regnum() to mmx_regnum_p().
* Please rename nr_mmx_regs to mmx_num_regs.
* Why do you use regcache_raw_read_as_address() in
mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum? Looks misleading to me...
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers
2002-08-12 11:10 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2002-08-12 12:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 7:35 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-08-12 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com> writes:
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This adds mmx registers to the i386.
>
>
> Great, a few nits though :-(
>
> * Please rename is_mmx_regnum() to mmx_regnum_p().
>
> * Please rename nr_mmx_regs to mmx_num_regs.
>
> * Why do you use regcache_raw_read_as_address() in
> mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum? Looks misleading to me...
(because I happen to know what the function does :-)
I'll rename the function to ..._as_longest().
I'll fix the others.
thanks,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers
2002-08-12 12:00 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-08-13 7:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 14:39 ` Mark Kettenis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-08-13 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Mark Kettenis, gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --]
> Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com> writes:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This adds mmx registers to the i386.
>
>
> Great, a few nits though :-(
>
> * Please rename is_mmx_regnum() to mmx_regnum_p().
>
> * Please rename nr_mmx_regs to mmx_num_regs.
>
> * Why do you use regcache_raw_read_as_address() in
> mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum? Looks misleading to me...
>
> (because I happen to know what the function does :-)
> I'll rename the function to ..._as_longest().
>
> I'll fix the others.
Done, this is what I committed.
It also includes raw versions of the ..._unsigned() functions since the
mmx code needs to access the raw register cache.
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6097 bytes --]
2002-08-13 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* i386-tdep.c (i386_register_name): Handle mmx registers.
(mmx_regnum_p): New function.
(i386_mmx_names): New array.
(mmx_num_regs): New variable.
(i386_pseudo_register_read): New function.
(i386_pseudo_register_write): New function.
(mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum): New function. Code from Fernando Nasser.
* regcache.c (regcache_raw_read_unsigned): New function.
(regcache_raw_read_signed): New function.
* regcache.h (regcache_raw_read_unsigned): Declare.
(regcache_raw_read_signed): Declare.
Index: i386-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -r1.75 i386-tdep.c
--- i386-tdep.c 13 Aug 2002 13:58:50 -0000 1.75
+++ i386-tdep.c 13 Aug 2002 14:31:01 -0000
@@ -56,6 +56,23 @@
"mxcsr"
};
+/* MMX registers. */
+
+static char *i386_mmx_names[] =
+{
+ "mm0", "mm1", "mm2", "mm3",
+ "mm4", "mm5", "mm6", "mm7"
+};
+static const int mmx_num_regs = (sizeof (i386_mmx_names)
+ / sizeof (i386_mmx_names[0]));
+#define MM0_REGNUM (NUM_REGS)
+
+static int
+mmx_regnum_p (int reg)
+{
+ return (reg >= MM0_REGNUM && reg < MM0_REGNUM + mmx_num_regs);
+}
+
/* Return the name of register REG. */
const char *
@@ -63,6 +80,8 @@
{
if (reg < 0)
return NULL;
+ if (mmx_regnum_p (reg))
+ return i386_mmx_names[reg - MM0_REGNUM];
if (reg >= sizeof (i386_register_names) / sizeof (*i386_register_names))
return NULL;
@@ -1090,9 +1109,64 @@
if (IS_SSE_REGNUM (regnum))
return builtin_type_vec128i;
+ if (mmx_regnum_p (regnum))
+ return builtin_type_vec64i;
+
return builtin_type_int;
}
+/* Map a cooked register onto a raw register or memory. For the i386,
+ the MMX registers need to be mapped onto floating point registers. */
+
+static int
+mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum)
+{
+ int mmxi;
+ ULONGEST fstat;
+ int tos;
+ int fpi;
+ mmxi = regnum - MM0_REGNUM;
+ regcache_raw_read_unsigned (regcache, FSTAT_REGNUM, &fstat);
+ tos = (fstat >> 11) & 0x7;
+ fpi = (mmxi + tos) % 8;
+ return (FP0_REGNUM + fpi);
+}
+
+static void
+i386_pseudo_register_read (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct regcache *regcache,
+ int regnum, void *buf)
+{
+ if (mmx_regnum_p (regnum))
+ {
+ char *mmx_buf = alloca (MAX_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE);
+ int fpnum = mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum (regcache, regnum);
+ regcache_raw_read (regcache, fpnum, mmx_buf);
+ /* Extract (always little endian). */
+ memcpy (buf, mmx_buf, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum));
+ }
+ else
+ regcache_raw_read (regcache, regnum, buf);
+}
+
+static void
+i386_pseudo_register_write (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct regcache *regcache,
+ int regnum, const void *buf)
+{
+ if (mmx_regnum_p (regnum))
+ {
+ char *mmx_buf = alloca (MAX_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE);
+ int fpnum = mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum (regcache, regnum);
+ /* Read ... */
+ regcache_raw_read (regcache, fpnum, mmx_buf);
+ /* ... Modify ... (always little endian). */
+ memcpy (mmx_buf, buf, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum));
+ /* ... Write. */
+ regcache_raw_write (regcache, fpnum, mmx_buf);
+ }
+ else
+ regcache_raw_write (regcache, regnum, buf);
+}
+
/* Return true iff register REGNUM's virtual format is different from
its raw format. Note that this definition assumes that the host
supports IEEE 32-bit floats, since it doesn't say that SSE
@@ -1485,6 +1559,11 @@
set_gdbarch_saved_pc_after_call (gdbarch, i386_saved_pc_after_call);
set_gdbarch_frame_num_args (gdbarch, i386_frame_num_args);
set_gdbarch_pc_in_sigtramp (gdbarch, i386_pc_in_sigtramp);
+
+ /* Wire in the MMX registers. */
+ set_gdbarch_num_pseudo_regs (gdbarch, mmx_num_regs);
+ set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_read);
+ set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_write (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_write);
/* Hook in ABI-specific overrides, if they have been registered. */
gdbarch_init_osabi (info, gdbarch, osabi);
Index: regcache.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/regcache.c,v
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -r1.51 regcache.c
--- regcache.c 13 Aug 2002 13:58:50 -0000 1.51
+++ regcache.c 13 Aug 2002 14:31:02 -0000
@@ -661,6 +661,31 @@
}
void
+regcache_raw_read_signed (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum, LONGEST *val)
+{
+ char *buf;
+ gdb_assert (regcache != NULL);
+ gdb_assert (regnum >= 0 && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers);
+ buf = alloca (regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
+ regcache_raw_read (regcache, regnum, buf);
+ (*val) = extract_signed_integer (buf,
+ regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
+}
+
+void
+regcache_raw_read_unsigned (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum,
+ ULONGEST *val)
+{
+ char *buf;
+ gdb_assert (regcache != NULL);
+ gdb_assert (regnum >= 0 && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers);
+ buf = alloca (regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
+ regcache_raw_read (regcache, regnum, buf);
+ (*val) = extract_unsigned_integer (buf,
+ regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
+}
+
+void
read_register_gen (int regnum, char *buf)
{
gdb_assert (current_regcache != NULL);
Index: regcache.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/regcache.h,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.13 regcache.h
--- regcache.h 13 Aug 2002 13:58:50 -0000 1.13
+++ regcache.h 13 Aug 2002 14:31:02 -0000
@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@
void regcache_raw_read (struct regcache *regcache, int rawnum, void *buf);
void regcache_raw_write (struct regcache *regcache, int rawnum,
const void *buf);
+extern void regcache_raw_read_signed (struct regcache *regcache,
+ int regnum, LONGEST *val);
+extern void regcache_raw_read_unsigned (struct regcache *regcache,
+ int regnum, ULONGEST *val);
int regcache_valid_p (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum);
/* Transfer a cooked register [0..NUM_REGS+NUM_PSEUDO_REGS). */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers
2002-08-13 7:35 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-08-13 14:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-08-13 14:55 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2002-08-13 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: gdb-patches
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:35:37 -0400
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
> Hello,
>
> This adds mmx registers to the i386.
>
Done, this is what I committed.
Ouch! This patch uncovers a problem in the new regcache code and
segfaults on my FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE system. The problem is that:
+ set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_read);
+ set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_write (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_write);
changes the i386 target's register cache from "legacy" to "new". This
means that there isn't room for the pseudo registers in
register_valid_p, yet registers_changed() tries to frob the entries
for the pseudo registers.
I don't see an obvious way to fix this. Any bright ideas Andrew?
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers
2002-08-13 14:39 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2002-08-13 14:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 15:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 15:10 ` Mark Kettenis
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-08-13 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:35:37 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This adds mmx registers to the i386.
> >
>
> Done, this is what I committed.
>
> Ouch! This patch uncovers a problem in the new regcache code and
> segfaults on my FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE system. The problem is that:
My Red Hat GNU/Linux tests didn't bat an eyelid :-(
> + set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_read);
> + set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_write (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_write);
>
> changes the i386 target's register cache from "legacy" to "new". This
> means that there isn't room for the pseudo registers in
> register_valid_p, yet registers_changed() tries to frob the entries
> for the pseudo registers.
>
> I don't see an obvious way to fix this. Any bright ideas Andrew?
Hmm, yes. It should be clearing:
[0 .. current_regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers)
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers
2002-08-13 14:55 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-08-13 15:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 15:10 ` Mark Kettenis
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-08-13 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Mark Kettenis, gdb-patches
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:35:37 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
>
> > Hello,
> > > This adds mmx registers to the i386.
> >
> Done, this is what I committed.
>
> Ouch! This patch uncovers a problem in the new regcache code and
> segfaults on my FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE system. The problem is that:
>
> My Red Hat GNU/Linux tests didn't bat an eyelid :-(
>
> + set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_read);
> + set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_write (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_write);
>
> changes the i386 target's register cache from "legacy" to "new". This
> means that there isn't room for the pseudo registers in
> register_valid_p, yet registers_changed() tries to frob the entries
> for the pseudo registers.
>
> I don't see an obvious way to fix this. Any bright ideas Andrew?
>
> Hmm, yes. It should be clearing:
> [0 .. current_regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers)
PS: The code should also still allocate nr_cooked_registers worth of
register_valid_p. That way, erant code won't crash things.
I'll fix both in a tick.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers
2002-08-13 14:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 15:03 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-08-13 15:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-08-13 15:21 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2002-08-13 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: gdb-patches
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:55:33 -0400
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
> + set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_read);
> + set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_write (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_write);
>
> changes the i386 target's register cache from "legacy" to "new". This
> means that there isn't room for the pseudo registers in
> register_valid_p, yet registers_changed() tries to frob the entries
> for the pseudo registers.
>
> I don't see an obvious way to fix this. Any bright ideas Andrew?
Hmm, yes. It should be clearing:
[0 .. current_regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers)
Clearing the pseudo registers isn't necessary on targets that still
use the legacy stuff?
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers
2002-08-13 15:10 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2002-08-13 15:21 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-08-13 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:55:33 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
>
> > + set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_read);
> > + set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_write (gdbarch, i386_pseudo_register_write);
> >
> > changes the i386 target's register cache from "legacy" to "new". This
> > means that there isn't room for the pseudo registers in
> > register_valid_p, yet registers_changed() tries to frob the entries
> > for the pseudo registers.
> >
> > I don't see an obvious way to fix this. Any bright ideas Andrew?
>
> Hmm, yes. It should be clearing:
> [0 .. current_regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers)
>
> Clearing the pseudo registers isn't necessary on targets that still
> use the legacy stuff?
Shh! nr_raw_registers == number of raw registers in the register cache
== NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS on legacy targets. Just don't tell anyone
M'kay ;-)
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-11: Shouldn't be including pseudo-registers
in the register buffer. Unfortunatly some architectures do. */
descr->nr_cooked_registers = NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS;
descr->nr_raw_registers = descr->nr_cooked_registers;
descr->sizeof_raw_register_valid_p = descr->nr_cooked_registers;
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-13 22:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-10 16:58 [rfa:i386] Add mmx registers Andrew Cagney
2002-08-12 11:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-08-12 12:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 7:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 14:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-08-13 14:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 15:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 15:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-08-13 15:21 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox