* [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
@ 2012-07-17 21:24 dje
2012-07-17 21:43 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: dje @ 2012-07-17 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hi.
I have a need to be able to control the use of deprecated index sections
with an option, instead of the command line.
I was going to wait to apply this until after 7.5,
but with the new "-iex" option I realize that the new
"--use-deprecated-index-sections" option could be considered redundant.
So I'm thinking about deleting that as well, in favor of having just this.
What do y'all think?
2012-07-17 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* NEWS: Document new options "set/show use-deprecated-index-sections".
* dwarf2read.c (_initialize_dwarf2_read): New options
"set/show use-deprecated-index-sections".
doc/
* gdb.texinfo (Index Files): Document how to control the use of
deprecated index sections.
Index: NEWS
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/NEWS,v
retrieving revision 1.533
diff -u -p -r1.533 NEWS
--- NEWS 4 Jul 2012 20:49:56 -0000 1.533
+++ NEWS 17 Jul 2012 21:17:47 -0000
@@ -137,6 +137,10 @@
* New commands
+ ** "set use-deprecated-index-sections on|off"
+ "show use-deprecated-index-sections on|off"
+ Controls the use of deprecated .gdb_index sections.
+
** "catch load" and "catch unload" can be used to stop when a shared
library is loaded or unloaded, respectively.
Index: dwarf2read.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
retrieving revision 1.687
diff -u -p -r1.687 dwarf2read.c
--- dwarf2read.c 16 Jul 2012 03:22:40 -0000 1.687
+++ dwarf2read.c 17 Jul 2012 21:13:14 -0000
@@ -19387,6 +19387,17 @@ the demangler."),
NULL, show_check_physname,
&setdebuglist, &showdebuglist);
+ add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("use-deprecated-index-sections",
+ no_class, &use_deprecated_index_sections, _("\
+Set whether to use deprecated gdb_index sections."), _("\
+Show whether to use deprecated gdb_index sections."), _("\
+When enabled .gdb_index sections that have been deprecated are used anyway.\n\
+Normally they are ignored either because of a missing feature or\n\
+performance issue."),
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
+ &setlist, &showlist);
+
c = add_cmd ("gdb-index", class_files, save_gdb_index_command,
_("\
Save a gdb-index file.\n\
Index: doc/gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.990
diff -u -p -r1.990 gdb.texinfo
--- doc/gdb.texinfo 5 Jul 2012 01:08:24 -0000 1.990
+++ doc/gdb.texinfo 17 Jul 2012 21:13:15 -0000
@@ -16753,6 +16753,26 @@ $ objcopy --add-section .gdb_index=symfi
--set-section-flags .gdb_index=readonly symfile symfile
@end smallexample
+@value{GDBN} will normally ignore older versions of @file{.gdb_index}
+sections that have been deprecated. Usually they are deprecated because
+they are missing a new feature or have performance issues.
+
+There are two ways to control the use deprecated index sections:
+
+@table @code
+
+@item -use-deprecated-index-sections
+Pass this command line option when starting @value{GDBN}.
+
+@item set use-deprecated-index-sections
+@kindex set use-deprecated-index-sections
+Set this option to control the treatment of deprecated index sections.
+When @code{on}, index sections are used even if they are deprecated.
+When @code{off}, only current versions of index sections are used.
+The default is @code{off}.
+
+@end table
+
There are currently some limitation on indices. They only work when
for DWARF debugging information, not stabs. And, they do not
currently work for programs using Ada.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-17 21:24 [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections dje
@ 2012-07-17 21:43 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-17 22:10 ` Doug Evans
2012-07-18 22:34 ` dje
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2012-07-17 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:23:51 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
> I was going to wait to apply this until after 7.5,
> but with the new "-iex" option I realize that the new
> "--use-deprecated-index-sections" option could be considered redundant.
> So I'm thinking about deleting that as well, in favor of having just this.
I would find less GDB options to be good.
> +@item set use-deprecated-index-sections
> +@kindex set use-deprecated-index-sections
> +Set this option to control the treatment of deprecated index sections.
> +When @code{on}, index sections are used even if they are deprecated.
> +When @code{off}, only current versions of index sections are used.
> +The default is @code{off}.
This is not completely correct:
if (version < 6 && !use_deprecated_index_sections)
if (version > 7)
So version 6 is not "current" but it is still used even without
-use-deprecated-index-sections. At least gdb doc should be exact IMO.
It is also questionable if version 6 should be ignored without
-use-deprecated-index-sections. I guess the possible performance regression
(against non-index case) is so rare it was not worth ignoring version 6.
Thanks,
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-17 21:43 ` Jan Kratochvil
@ 2012-07-17 22:10 ` Doug Evans
2012-07-18 22:34 ` dje
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Doug Evans @ 2012-07-17 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:23:51 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
>> I was going to wait to apply this until after 7.5,
>> but with the new "-iex" option I realize that the new
>> "--use-deprecated-index-sections" option could be considered redundant.
>> So I'm thinking about deleting that as well, in favor of having just this.
>
> I would find less GDB options to be good.
>
>
>> +@item set use-deprecated-index-sections
>> +@kindex set use-deprecated-index-sections
>> +Set this option to control the treatment of deprecated index sections.
>> +When @code{on}, index sections are used even if they are deprecated.
>
>> +When @code{off}, only current versions of index sections are used.
>> +The default is @code{off}.
>
> This is not completely correct:
> if (version < 6 && !use_deprecated_index_sections)
> if (version > 7)
I chose the word "current" to include handling this case (i.e.
"current" wasn't intended to convey "latest". Rather, it was intended
to convey "not-deprecated" and avoid going into a whole lot of extra
verbiage). No disagreement that it could be worded better of course.
> So version 6 is not "current" but it is still used even without
> -use-deprecated-index-sections. At least gdb doc should be exact IMO.
>
> It is also questionable if version 6 should be ignored without
> -use-deprecated-index-sections. I guess the possible performance regression
> (against non-index case) is so rare it was not worth ignoring version 6.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-17 21:43 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-17 22:10 ` Doug Evans
@ 2012-07-18 22:34 ` dje
2012-07-18 23:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-19 16:11 ` [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dje @ 2012-07-18 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches, eliz
Jan Kratochvil writes:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:23:51 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
> > I was going to wait to apply this until after 7.5,
> > but with the new "-iex" option I realize that the new
> > "--use-deprecated-index-sections" option could be considered redundant.
> > So I'm thinking about deleting that as well, in favor of having just this.
>
> I would find less GDB options to be good.
>
>
> > +@item set use-deprecated-index-sections
> > +@kindex set use-deprecated-index-sections
> > +Set this option to control the treatment of deprecated index sections.
> > +When @code{on}, index sections are used even if they are deprecated.
>
> > +When @code{off}, only current versions of index sections are used.
> > +The default is @code{off}.
>
> This is not completely correct:
> if (version < 6 && !use_deprecated_index_sections)
> if (version > 7)
>
> So version 6 is not "current" but it is still used even without
> -use-deprecated-index-sections. At least gdb doc should be exact IMO.
>
> It is also questionable if version 6 should be ignored without
> -use-deprecated-index-sections. I guess the possible performance regression
> (against non-index case) is so rare it was not worth ignoring version 6.
How about this? (for cvs head and the 7.5 branch)
[This patch needs a slight tweak to apply cleanly to the branch.
I'll make the tweak after checking this into head.]
P.S. Eli, I need a doc RFA here too. Thanks.
2012-07-18 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* NEWS: Document new options "set/show use-deprecated-index-sections",
and delete reference to --use-deprecated-index-sections.
* symfile.h (use_deprecated_index_sections): Delete.
* dwarf2read.c (use_deprecated_index_sections): Make static.
(read_index_from_section): Update wording of how to load
deprecated index sections.
(_initialize_dwarf2_read): New options
"set/show use-deprecated-index-sections".
* main.c (captured_main): Delete --use-deprecated-index-sections.
doc/
* gdb.texinfo (Mode Options): Delete --use-deprecated-index-sections.
(Index Files): Document how to control the use of deprecated index
sections.
(Index Section Format): Replace --use-deprecated-index-sections with
"set use-deprecated-index-sections on".
Index: NEWS
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/NEWS,v
retrieving revision 1.534
diff -u -p -r1.534 NEWS
--- NEWS 18 Jul 2012 04:02:10 -0000 1.534
+++ NEWS 18 Jul 2012 22:21:17 -0000
@@ -114,11 +114,13 @@
* The .gdb_index section has been updated to include symbols for
inlined functions. GDB will ignore older .gdb_index sections by
default, which could cause symbol files to be loaded more slowly
- until their .gdb_index sections can be recreated. The new option
- --use-deprecated-index-sections will cause GDB to use any older
- .gdb_index sections it finds. This will restore performance, but
- the ability to set breakpoints on inlined functions will be lost
- in symbol files with older .gdb_index sections.
+ until their .gdb_index sections can be recreated. The new command
+ "set use-deprecated-index-sections on" will cause GDB to use any older
+ .gdb_index sections it finds. To control this from the command line
+ use "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'".
+ This will restore performance, but the ability to set breakpoints on
+ inlined functions will be lost in symbol files with older .gdb_index
+ sections.
The .gdb_index section has also been updated to record more information
about each symbol. This speeds up the "info variables", "info functions"
@@ -139,6 +141,10 @@
* New commands
+ ** "set use-deprecated-index-sections on|off"
+ "show use-deprecated-index-sections on|off"
+ Controls the use of deprecated .gdb_index sections.
+
** "catch load" and "catch unload" can be used to stop when a shared
library is loaded or unloaded, respectively.
Index: dwarf2read.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
retrieving revision 1.693
diff -u -p -r1.693 dwarf2read.c
--- dwarf2read.c 18 Jul 2012 20:01:27 -0000 1.693
+++ dwarf2read.c 18 Jul 2012 22:21:18 -0000
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int dwarf2_die_debug = 0;
static int check_physname = 0;
/* When non-zero, do not reject deprecated .gdb_index sections. */
-int use_deprecated_index_sections = 0;
+static int use_deprecated_index_sections = 0;
/* When set, the file that we're processing is known to have debugging
info for C++ namespaces. GCC 3.3.x did not produce this information,
@@ -2611,15 +2611,18 @@ read_index_from_section (struct objfile
Versions earlier than 6 did not emit psymbols for inlined
functions. Using these files will cause GDB not to be able to
set breakpoints on inlined functions by name, so we ignore these
- indices unless the --use-deprecated-index-sections command line
- option was supplied. */
+ indices unless the user has done
+ "set use-deprecated-index-sections on". */
if (version < 6 && !deprecated_ok)
{
static int warning_printed = 0;
if (!warning_printed)
{
- warning (_("Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in %s, pass "
- "--use-deprecated-index-sections to use them anyway"),
+ warning (_("\
+Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in %s.\n\
+Do \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" to use them anyway.\n\
+This can be done from the command line by passing\n\
+`-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
filename);
warning_printed = 1;
}
@@ -19630,6 +19633,17 @@ the demangler."),
NULL, show_check_physname,
&setdebuglist, &showdebuglist);
+ add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("use-deprecated-index-sections",
+ no_class, &use_deprecated_index_sections, _("\
+Set whether to use deprecated gdb_index sections."), _("\
+Show whether to use deprecated gdb_index sections."), _("\
+When enabled .gdb_index sections that have been deprecated are used anyway.\n\
+Normally they are ignored either because of a missing feature or\n\
+performance issue."),
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
+ &setlist, &showlist);
+
c = add_cmd ("gdb-index", class_files, save_gdb_index_command,
_("\
Save a gdb-index file.\n\
Index: main.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -u -p -r1.110 main.c
--- main.c 2 Jul 2012 12:05:00 -0000 1.110
+++ main.c 18 Jul 2012 22:21:18 -0000
@@ -471,8 +471,6 @@ captured_main (void *data)
{"args", no_argument, &set_args, 1},
{"l", required_argument, 0, 'l'},
{"return-child-result", no_argument, &return_child_result, 1},
- {"use-deprecated-index-sections", no_argument,
- &use_deprecated_index_sections, 1},
{0, no_argument, 0, 0}
};
Index: symfile.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/symfile.h,v
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -u -p -r1.110 symfile.h
--- symfile.h 18 Jul 2012 16:12:17 -0000 1.110
+++ symfile.h 18 Jul 2012 22:21:18 -0000
@@ -673,9 +673,6 @@ extern void dwarf2_build_frame_info (str
void dwarf2_free_objfile (struct objfile *);
-/* Whether to use deprecated .gdb_index sections. */
-extern int use_deprecated_index_sections;
-
/* From mdebugread.c */
/* Hack to force structures to exist before use in parameter list. */
Index: doc/gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.990
diff -u -p -r1.990 gdb.texinfo
--- doc/gdb.texinfo 5 Jul 2012 01:08:24 -0000 1.990
+++ doc/gdb.texinfo 18 Jul 2012 22:21:19 -0000
@@ -1247,13 +1247,6 @@ memory usage after it completes each com
This option causes @value{GDBN} to print its version number and
no-warranty blurb, and exit.
-@item -use-deprecated-index-sections
-@cindex @code{--use-deprecated-index-sections}
-This option causes @value{GDBN} to read and use deprecated
-@samp{.gdb_index} sections from symbol files. This can speed up
-startup, but may result in some functionality being lost.
-@xref{Index Section Format}.
-
@end table
@node Startup
@@ -16753,6 +16746,15 @@ $ objcopy --add-section .gdb_index=symfi
--set-section-flags .gdb_index=readonly symfile symfile
@end smallexample
+@value{GDBN} will normally ignore older versions of @file{.gdb_index}
+sections that have been deprecated. Usually they are deprecated because
+they are missing a new feature or have performance issues.
+To tell @value{GDBN} to use a deprecated index section anyway
+specify @code{set use-deprecated-index-sections on}.
+The default is @code{off}.
+This can speed up startup, but may result in some functionality being lost.
+@xref{Index Section Format}.
+
There are currently some limitation on indices. They only work when
for DWARF debugging information, not stabs. And, they do not
currently work for programs using Ada.
@@ -40408,7 +40410,7 @@ Version 4 uses a different hashing funct
Version 6 includes symbols for inlined functions, whereas versions 4
and 5 do not. Version 7 adds attributes to the CU indices in the
symbol table. @value{GDBN} will only read version 4, 5, or 6 indices
-if the @code{--use-deprecated-index-sections} option is used.
+by specifying @code{set use-deprecated-index-sections on}.
@item
The offset, from the start of the file, of the CU list.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-18 22:34 ` dje
@ 2012-07-18 23:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-18 23:53 ` dje
2012-07-19 16:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-07-19 16:11 ` [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2012-07-18 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje; +Cc: gdb-patches, eliz
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:33:42 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
> + use "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'".
[...]
> +`-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
It is more Eli's decision but I would find it overquoted.
(1) ` is deprecated by GNU Coding Standard in favor of '.
(2) If user really passes "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'"
to GDB it will not work:
$ gdb "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'"
gdb: unrecognized option '-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on''
So IMO:
> + use: -iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'
[...]
> +-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" to gdb."),
Thanks,
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-18 23:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
@ 2012-07-18 23:53 ` dje
2012-07-19 7:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-19 16:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: dje @ 2012-07-18 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches, eliz
Jan Kratochvil writes:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:33:42 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
> > + use "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'".
> [...]
> > +`-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
>
> It is more Eli's decision but I would find it overquoted.
> (1) ` is deprecated by GNU Coding Standard in favor of '.
> (2) If user really passes "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'"
> to GDB it will not work:
> $ gdb "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'"
> gdb: unrecognized option '-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on''
>
> So IMO:
> > + use: -iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'
> [...]
> > +-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" to gdb."),
One could apply the same reasoning to a lot of other places.
I'm happy to follow whatever rules there are,
I just require them to be applied consistently.
Maybe it should be phrased as
<-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\">
since when we say "Type <return> to continue"
we assume they know we're not asking them to type
< r e t u r n >. :-(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-18 23:53 ` dje
@ 2012-07-19 7:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2012-07-19 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje; +Cc: gdb-patches, eliz
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:52:48 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
> Maybe it should be phrased as
> <-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\">
Yes, I find it more clear to the user FYI although I respect Eli's opinion on
the subject.
Thanks,
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-18 23:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-18 23:53 ` dje
@ 2012-07-19 16:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-07-19 16:28 ` Doug Evans
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2012-07-19 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: dje, gdb-patches
> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:33:03 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:33:42 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
> > + use "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'".
> [...]
> > +`-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
>
> It is more Eli's decision but I would find it overquoted.
How about removing that sentence altogether? We have no reason to
advertise -iex in that particular warning message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-18 22:34 ` dje
2012-07-18 23:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
@ 2012-07-19 16:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2012-07-19 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje; +Cc: jan.kratochvil, gdb-patches
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:33:42 -0700
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org
> From: dje@google.com
>
> P.S. Eli, I need a doc RFA here too. Thanks.
Coming up:
> +When enabled .gdb_index sections that have been deprecated are used anyway.\n
^
Please add a comma here, otherwise the sentence is ambiguous and
unclear.
Also, I think
When enabled, deprecated .gdb_index sections are used anyway.
is both shorter and clearer.
Everything else is fine with me, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-19 16:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2012-07-19 16:28 ` Doug Evans
2012-07-19 16:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Doug Evans @ 2012-07-19 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: Jan Kratochvil, gdb-patches
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:33:03 +0200
>> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:33:42 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
>> > + use "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'".
>> [...]
>> > +`-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
>>
>> It is more Eli's decision but I would find it overquoted.
>
> How about removing that sentence altogether? We have no reason to
> advertise -iex in that particular warning message.
I'd like to keep the content of the warning.
I realize it's just a performance issue if users don't get .gdb_index,
but in this case I think the current content of the warning is
justified.
It can't be that hard to come up with a simple way to be clear here. :-)
How about
"gdb -iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on' <program>"
or something along those lines?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-19 16:28 ` Doug Evans
@ 2012-07-19 16:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-07-19 18:26 ` dje
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2012-07-19 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Evans; +Cc: jan.kratochvil, gdb-patches
> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:27:46 -0700
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:33:03 +0200
> >> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org
> >>
> >> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:33:42 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
> >> > + use "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'".
> >> [...]
> >> > +`-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
> >>
> >> It is more Eli's decision but I would find it overquoted.
> >
> > How about removing that sentence altogether? We have no reason to
> > advertise -iex in that particular warning message.
>
> I'd like to keep the content of the warning.
The text you suggested is:
warning (_("\
Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in %s.\n\
Do \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" to use them anyway.\n\
This can be done from the command line by passing\n\
`-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
filename);
I'm saying that mentioning the "set" command is enough, no need to
also say that the command can be invoked through -iex, because _any_
GDB command can be invoked like that.
That said, I won't argue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-19 16:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2012-07-19 18:26 ` dje
2012-07-19 19:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: dje @ 2012-07-19 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii, jan.kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:27:46 -0700
> > From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> > Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > >> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:33:03 +0200
> > >> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> > >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:33:42 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
> > >> > + use "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'".
> > >> [...]
> > >> > +`-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
> > >>
> > >> It is more Eli's decision but I would find it overquoted.
> > >
> > > How about removing that sentence altogether? We have no reason to
> > > advertise -iex in that particular warning message.
> >
> > I'd like to keep the content of the warning.
>
> The text you suggested is:
>
> warning (_("\
> Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in %s.\n\
> Do \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" to use them anyway.\n\
> This can be done from the command line by passing\n\
> `-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
> filename);
>
> I'm saying that mentioning the "set" command is enough, no need to
> also say that the command can be invoked through -iex, because _any_
> GDB command can be invoked like that.
>
> That said, I won't argue.
How about this?
2012-07-19 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* NEWS: Document new options "set/show use-deprecated-index-sections",
and delete reference to --use-deprecated-index-sections.
* symfile.h (use_deprecated_index_sections): Delete.
* dwarf2read.c (use_deprecated_index_sections): Make static.
(read_index_from_section): Update wording of how to load
deprecated index sections.
(_initialize_dwarf2_read): New options
"set/show use-deprecated-index-sections".
* main.c (captured_main): Delete --use-deprecated-index-sections.
doc/
* gdb.texinfo (Mode Options): Delete --use-deprecated-index-sections.
(Index Files): Document how to control the use of deprecated index
sections.
(Index Section Format): Replace --use-deprecated-index-sections with
"set use-deprecated-index-sections on".
Index: NEWS
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/NEWS,v
retrieving revision 1.534
diff -u -p -r1.534 NEWS
--- NEWS 18 Jul 2012 04:02:10 -0000 1.534
+++ NEWS 19 Jul 2012 18:15:39 -0000
@@ -114,11 +114,11 @@
* The .gdb_index section has been updated to include symbols for
inlined functions. GDB will ignore older .gdb_index sections by
default, which could cause symbol files to be loaded more slowly
- until their .gdb_index sections can be recreated. The new option
- --use-deprecated-index-sections will cause GDB to use any older
- .gdb_index sections it finds. This will restore performance, but
- the ability to set breakpoints on inlined functions will be lost
- in symbol files with older .gdb_index sections.
+ until their .gdb_index sections can be recreated. The new command
+ "set use-deprecated-index-sections on" will cause GDB to use any older
+ .gdb_index sections it finds. This will restore performance, but the
+ ability to set breakpoints on inlined functions will be lost in symbol
+ files with older .gdb_index sections.
The .gdb_index section has also been updated to record more information
about each symbol. This speeds up the "info variables", "info functions"
@@ -139,6 +139,10 @@
* New commands
+ ** "set use-deprecated-index-sections on|off"
+ "show use-deprecated-index-sections on|off"
+ Controls the use of deprecated .gdb_index sections.
+
** "catch load" and "catch unload" can be used to stop when a shared
library is loaded or unloaded, respectively.
Index: dwarf2read.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
retrieving revision 1.694
diff -u -p -r1.694 dwarf2read.c
--- dwarf2read.c 19 Jul 2012 16:35:48 -0000 1.694
+++ dwarf2read.c 19 Jul 2012 18:15:40 -0000
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int dwarf2_die_debug = 0;
static int check_physname = 0;
/* When non-zero, do not reject deprecated .gdb_index sections. */
-int use_deprecated_index_sections = 0;
+static int use_deprecated_index_sections = 0;
/* When set, the file that we're processing is known to have debugging
info for C++ namespaces. GCC 3.3.x did not produce this information,
@@ -2611,15 +2611,17 @@ read_index_from_section (struct objfile
Versions earlier than 6 did not emit psymbols for inlined
functions. Using these files will cause GDB not to be able to
set breakpoints on inlined functions by name, so we ignore these
- indices unless the --use-deprecated-index-sections command line
- option was supplied. */
+ indices unless the user has done
+ "set use-deprecated-index-sections on". */
if (version < 6 && !deprecated_ok)
{
static int warning_printed = 0;
if (!warning_printed)
{
- warning (_("Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in %s, pass "
- "--use-deprecated-index-sections to use them anyway"),
+ warning (_("\
+Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in %s.\n\
+Do \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" before the file is read\n\
+to use the section anyway."),
filename);
warning_printed = 1;
}
@@ -19652,6 +19654,18 @@ the demangler."),
NULL, show_check_physname,
&setdebuglist, &showdebuglist);
+ add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("use-deprecated-index-sections",
+ no_class, &use_deprecated_index_sections, _("\
+Set whether to use deprecated gdb_index sections."), _("\
+Show whether to use deprecated gdb_index sections."), _("\
+When enabled, deprecated .gdb_index sections are used anyway.\n\
+Normally they are ignored either because of a missing feature or\n\
+performance issue.\n\
+Warning: This option must be enabled before gdb reads the file."),
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
+ &setlist, &showlist);
+
c = add_cmd ("gdb-index", class_files, save_gdb_index_command,
_("\
Save a gdb-index file.\n\
Index: main.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -u -p -r1.110 main.c
--- main.c 2 Jul 2012 12:05:00 -0000 1.110
+++ main.c 19 Jul 2012 18:15:40 -0000
@@ -471,8 +471,6 @@ captured_main (void *data)
{"args", no_argument, &set_args, 1},
{"l", required_argument, 0, 'l'},
{"return-child-result", no_argument, &return_child_result, 1},
- {"use-deprecated-index-sections", no_argument,
- &use_deprecated_index_sections, 1},
{0, no_argument, 0, 0}
};
Index: symfile.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/symfile.h,v
retrieving revision 1.111
diff -u -p -r1.111 symfile.h
--- symfile.h 18 Jul 2012 23:37:58 -0000 1.111
+++ symfile.h 19 Jul 2012 18:15:40 -0000
@@ -673,9 +673,6 @@ extern void dwarf2_build_frame_info (str
void dwarf2_free_objfile (struct objfile *);
-/* Whether to use deprecated .gdb_index sections. */
-extern int use_deprecated_index_sections;
-
/* From mdebugread.c */
/* Hack to force structures to exist before use in parameter list. */
Index: doc/gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.990
diff -u -p -r1.990 gdb.texinfo
--- doc/gdb.texinfo 5 Jul 2012 01:08:24 -0000 1.990
+++ doc/gdb.texinfo 19 Jul 2012 18:15:41 -0000
@@ -1247,13 +1247,6 @@ memory usage after it completes each com
This option causes @value{GDBN} to print its version number and
no-warranty blurb, and exit.
-@item -use-deprecated-index-sections
-@cindex @code{--use-deprecated-index-sections}
-This option causes @value{GDBN} to read and use deprecated
-@samp{.gdb_index} sections from symbol files. This can speed up
-startup, but may result in some functionality being lost.
-@xref{Index Section Format}.
-
@end table
@node Startup
@@ -16753,6 +16746,28 @@ $ objcopy --add-section .gdb_index=symfi
--set-section-flags .gdb_index=readonly symfile symfile
@end smallexample
+@value{GDBN} will normally ignore older versions of @file{.gdb_index}
+sections that have been deprecated. Usually they are deprecated because
+they are missing a new feature or have performance issues.
+To tell @value{GDBN} to use a deprecated index section anyway
+specify @code{set use-deprecated-index-sections on}.
+The default is @code{off}.
+This can speed up startup, but may result in some functionality being lost.
+@xref{Index Section Format}.
+
+@emph{Warning:} Setting @code{use-deprecated-index-sections} to @code{on}
+must be done before gdb reads the file. The following will not work:
+
+@smallexample
+$ gdb -ex "set use-deprecated-index-sections on" <program>
+@end smallexample
+
+Instead you must do, for example,
+
+@smallexample
+$ gdb -iex "set use-deprecated-index-sections on" <program>
+@end smallexample
+
There are currently some limitation on indices. They only work when
for DWARF debugging information, not stabs. And, they do not
currently work for programs using Ada.
@@ -40408,7 +40423,7 @@ Version 4 uses a different hashing funct
Version 6 includes symbols for inlined functions, whereas versions 4
and 5 do not. Version 7 adds attributes to the CU indices in the
symbol table. @value{GDBN} will only read version 4, 5, or 6 indices
-if the @code{--use-deprecated-index-sections} option is used.
+by specifying @code{set use-deprecated-index-sections on}.
@item
The offset, from the start of the file, of the CU list.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-19 18:26 ` dje
@ 2012-07-19 19:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-07-20 18:01 ` dje
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2012-07-19 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje; +Cc: jan.kratochvil, gdb-patches
> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:25:41 -0700
> cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: dje@google.com
>
> How about this?
Fine with me, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
2012-07-19 19:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2012-07-20 18:01 ` dje
2012-07-25 14:33 ` [patch] testsuite: Fix gdb.mi/* regression on RHEL-6 [Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections] Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: dje @ 2012-07-20 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: jan.kratochvil, gdb-patches
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:25:41 -0700
> > cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > From: dje@google.com
> >
> > How about this?
>
> Fine with me, thanks.
Thanks.
And I committed this to the 7.5 branch.
2012-07-20 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* NEWS: Document new options "set/show use-deprecated-index-sections",
and delete reference to --use-deprecated-index-sections.
* symfile.h (use_deprecated_index_sections): Delete.
* dwarf2read.c (use_deprecated_index_sections): Make static.
(read_index_from_section): Update wording of how to load
deprecated index sections.
(_initialize_dwarf2_read): New options
"set/show use-deprecated-index-sections".
* main.c (captured_main): Delete --use-deprecated-index-sections.
doc/
* gdb.texinfo (Mode Options): Delete --use-deprecated-index-sections.
(Index Files): Document how to control the use of deprecated index
sections.
(Index Section Format): Replace --use-deprecated-index-sections with
"set use-deprecated-index-sections on".
Index: NEWS
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/NEWS,v
retrieving revision 1.533.2.1
diff -u -p -r1.533.2.1 NEWS
--- NEWS 18 Jul 2012 15:56:55 -0000 1.533.2.1
+++ NEWS 20 Jul 2012 17:57:19 -0000
@@ -112,11 +112,11 @@
* The .gdb_index section has been updated to include symbols for
inlined functions. GDB will ignore older .gdb_index sections by
default, which could cause symbol files to be loaded more slowly
- until their .gdb_index sections can be recreated. The new option
- --use-deprecated-index-sections will cause GDB to use any older
- .gdb_index sections it finds. This will restore performance, but
- the ability to set breakpoints on inlined functions will be lost
- in symbol files with older .gdb_index sections.
+ until their .gdb_index sections can be recreated. The new command
+ "set use-deprecated-index-sections on" will cause GDB to use any older
+ .gdb_index sections it finds. This will restore performance, but the
+ ability to set breakpoints on inlined functions will be lost in symbol
+ files with older .gdb_index sections.
The .gdb_index section has also been updated to record more information
about each symbol. This speeds up the "info variables", "info functions"
@@ -137,6 +137,10 @@
* New commands
+ ** "set use-deprecated-index-sections on|off"
+ "show use-deprecated-index-sections on|off"
+ Controls the use of deprecated .gdb_index sections.
+
** "catch load" and "catch unload" can be used to stop when a shared
library is loaded or unloaded, respectively.
Index: dwarf2read.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
retrieving revision 1.687
diff -u -p -r1.687 dwarf2read.c
--- dwarf2read.c 16 Jul 2012 03:22:40 -0000 1.687
+++ dwarf2read.c 20 Jul 2012 17:57:19 -0000
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int dwarf2_die_debug = 0;
static int check_physname = 0;
/* When non-zero, do not reject deprecated .gdb_index sections. */
-int use_deprecated_index_sections = 0;
+static int use_deprecated_index_sections = 0;
static int pagesize;
@@ -2558,15 +2558,17 @@ dwarf2_read_index (struct objfile *objfi
Versions earlier than 6 did not emit psymbols for inlined
functions. Using these files will cause GDB not to be able to
set breakpoints on inlined functions by name, so we ignore these
- indices unless the --use-deprecated-index-sections command line
- option was supplied. */
+ indices unless the user has done
+ "set use-deprecated-index-sections on". */
if (version < 6 && !use_deprecated_index_sections)
{
static int warning_printed = 0;
if (!warning_printed)
{
- warning (_("Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in %s, pass "
- "--use-deprecated-index-sections to use them anyway"),
+ warning (_("\
+Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in %s.\n\
+Do \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" before the file is read\n\
+to use the section anyway."),
objfile->name);
warning_printed = 1;
}
@@ -19387,6 +19389,18 @@ the demangler."),
NULL, show_check_physname,
&setdebuglist, &showdebuglist);
+ add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("use-deprecated-index-sections",
+ no_class, &use_deprecated_index_sections, _("\
+Set whether to use deprecated gdb_index sections."), _("\
+Show whether to use deprecated gdb_index sections."), _("\
+When enabled, deprecated .gdb_index sections are used anyway.\n\
+Normally they are ignored either because of a missing feature or\n\
+performance issue.\n\
+Warning: This option must be enabled before gdb reads the file."),
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
+ &setlist, &showlist);
+
c = add_cmd ("gdb-index", class_files, save_gdb_index_command,
_("\
Save a gdb-index file.\n\
Index: main.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -u -p -r1.110 main.c
--- main.c 2 Jul 2012 12:05:00 -0000 1.110
+++ main.c 20 Jul 2012 17:57:19 -0000
@@ -471,8 +471,6 @@ captured_main (void *data)
{"args", no_argument, &set_args, 1},
{"l", required_argument, 0, 'l'},
{"return-child-result", no_argument, &return_child_result, 1},
- {"use-deprecated-index-sections", no_argument,
- &use_deprecated_index_sections, 1},
{0, no_argument, 0, 0}
};
Index: symfile.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/symfile.h,v
retrieving revision 1.109
diff -u -p -r1.109 symfile.h
--- symfile.h 24 May 2012 22:14:35 -0000 1.109
+++ symfile.h 20 Jul 2012 17:57:19 -0000
@@ -676,9 +676,6 @@ extern void dwarf2_build_frame_info (str
void dwarf2_free_objfile (struct objfile *);
-/* Whether to use deprecated .gdb_index sections. */
-extern int use_deprecated_index_sections;
-
/* From mdebugread.c */
/* Hack to force structures to exist before use in parameter list. */
Index: doc/gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.990
diff -u -p -r1.990 gdb.texinfo
--- doc/gdb.texinfo 5 Jul 2012 01:08:24 -0000 1.990
+++ doc/gdb.texinfo 20 Jul 2012 17:57:20 -0000
@@ -1247,13 +1247,6 @@ memory usage after it completes each com
This option causes @value{GDBN} to print its version number and
no-warranty blurb, and exit.
-@item -use-deprecated-index-sections
-@cindex @code{--use-deprecated-index-sections}
-This option causes @value{GDBN} to read and use deprecated
-@samp{.gdb_index} sections from symbol files. This can speed up
-startup, but may result in some functionality being lost.
-@xref{Index Section Format}.
-
@end table
@node Startup
@@ -16753,6 +16746,28 @@ $ objcopy --add-section .gdb_index=symfi
--set-section-flags .gdb_index=readonly symfile symfile
@end smallexample
+@value{GDBN} will normally ignore older versions of @file{.gdb_index}
+sections that have been deprecated. Usually they are deprecated because
+they are missing a new feature or have performance issues.
+To tell @value{GDBN} to use a deprecated index section anyway
+specify @code{set use-deprecated-index-sections on}.
+The default is @code{off}.
+This can speed up startup, but may result in some functionality being lost.
+@xref{Index Section Format}.
+
+@emph{Warning:} Setting @code{use-deprecated-index-sections} to @code{on}
+must be done before gdb reads the file. The following will not work:
+
+@smallexample
+$ gdb -ex "set use-deprecated-index-sections on" <program>
+@end smallexample
+
+Instead you must do, for example,
+
+@smallexample
+$ gdb -iex "set use-deprecated-index-sections on" <program>
+@end smallexample
+
There are currently some limitation on indices. They only work when
for DWARF debugging information, not stabs. And, they do not
currently work for programs using Ada.
@@ -40408,7 +40423,7 @@ Version 4 uses a different hashing funct
Version 6 includes symbols for inlined functions, whereas versions 4
and 5 do not. Version 7 adds attributes to the CU indices in the
symbol table. @value{GDBN} will only read version 4, 5, or 6 indices
-if the @code{--use-deprecated-index-sections} option is used.
+by specifying @code{set use-deprecated-index-sections on}.
@item
The offset, from the start of the file, of the CU list.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [patch] testsuite: Fix gdb.mi/* regression on RHEL-6 [Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections]
2012-07-20 18:01 ` dje
@ 2012-07-25 14:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-25 20:36 ` [commit+7.5] " Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2012-07-25 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje; +Cc: Eli Zaretskii, gdb-patches
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:01:18 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
> And I committed this to the 7.5 branch.
c3a09919048a2dcd937655d12acdb000d905841b is the first bad commit
commit c3a09919048a2dcd937655d12acdb000d905841b
Author: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Date: Fri Jul 20 17:38:00 2012 +0000
* NEWS: Document new options "set/show use-deprecated-index-sections",
[...]
-&"warning: Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in /usr/lib/debug/lib64/ld-2.12.so.debug, pass --use-deprecated-index-sections to use them anyway\n"^M
+&"warning: Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in /usr/lib/debug/lib64/ld-2.12.so.debug.\nDo \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" before the file is read\nto use the section anyway."^M
+&"\n"^M
(gdb) ^M
[...]
+ERROR: Unable to start target
This affects mostly any gdb.mi/*.exp testcase on RHEL-6.
I will check it in today; in two parts (the "\.gdb_index" regex fix is
unrelated).
Regards,
Jan
gdb/testsuite/
2012-07-25 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Fix testsuite regression after --use-deprecated-index-sections removal.
* lib/mi-support.exp (gdbindex_warning_re): Update the expect string.
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/mi-support.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/mi-support.exp
index 401565d..5235944 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/mi-support.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/mi-support.exp
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ global mi_inferior_tty_name
set MIFLAGS "-i=mi"
set thread_selected_re "=thread-selected,id=\"\[0-9\]+\"\r\n"
-set gdbindex_warning_re "&\"warning: Skipping \[^\r\n\]+ \.gdb_index section in \[^\"\]+\"\r\n"
+set gdbindex_warning_re "&\"warning: Skipping \[^\r\n\]+ \\.gdb_index section in \[^\r\n\]+\"\r\n(?:&\"\\\\n\"\r\n)?"
set library_loaded_re "=library-loaded\[^\n\]+\"\r\n(?:$gdbindex_warning_re)?"
set breakpoint_re "=(?:breakpoint-created|breakpoint-deleted)\[^\n\]+\"\r\n"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [commit+7.5] [patch] testsuite: Fix gdb.mi/* regression on RHEL-6 [Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections]
2012-07-25 14:33 ` [patch] testsuite: Fix gdb.mi/* regression on RHEL-6 [Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections] Jan Kratochvil
@ 2012-07-25 20:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-27 21:39 ` [commit#2+7.5] " Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2012-07-25 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje; +Cc: Eli Zaretskii, gdb-patches
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:33:07 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> gdb/testsuite/
> 2012-07-25 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>
> Fix testsuite regression after --use-deprecated-index-sections removal.
> * lib/mi-support.exp (gdbindex_warning_re): Update the expect string.
Checked in the fix part:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-07/msg00209.html
and for 7.5:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-07/msg00210.html
Thanks,
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [commit#2+7.5] [patch] testsuite: Fix gdb.mi/* regression on RHEL-6 [Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections]
2012-07-25 20:36 ` [commit+7.5] " Jan Kratochvil
@ 2012-07-27 21:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2012-07-27 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:36:04 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:33:07 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > gdb/testsuite/
> > 2012-07-25 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> >
> > Fix testsuite regression after --use-deprecated-index-sections removal.
> > * lib/mi-support.exp (gdbindex_warning_re): Update the expect string.
>
> Checked in the fix part:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-07/msg00209.html
> and for 7.5:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-07/msg00210.html
Forgot to review the original Gary' patch
commit c55ff693014c302c8b91b99cee0484751f105e15
Date: Fri Mar 16 16:47:29 2012 +0000
PR breakpoints/10738
that the regex string is on two more places. Fixed those now and checked in:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-07/msg00235.html
and for 7.5:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-07/msg00236.html
Jan
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-07/msg00235.html
--- src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2012/07/27 08:09:13 1.3308
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2012/07/27 21:34:29 1.3309
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2012-07-27 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+ Fix testsuite regression after --use-deprecated-index-sections removal.
+ * gdb.base/annota1.exp (run until main breakpoint): Update the expect
+ string.
+ * gdb.base/async-shell.exp (gdbindex_warning_re): Likewise.
+
2012-07-27 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
KFAIL for PR remote/14161.
--- src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp 2012/06/21 20:46:21 1.48
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp 2012/07/27 21:34:30 1.49
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
#exp_internal 1
set binexp [string_to_regexp $binfile]
gdb_test_multiple "run" "run until main breakpoint" {
- -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\nStarting program: $binexp \(\r\nwarning: Skipping \[^\r\n\]+ .gdb_index section in \[^\r\n\]+\)?\(\(\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\)|\(\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\)\)+\r\n\r\n\032\032starting\(\(\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\)|\(\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\)\)*\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoint 1\r\n\r\nBreakpoint 1, \r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-function-name\r\nmain\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(\\)\r\n\032\032frame-source-begin\r\n at \r\n\032\032frame-source-file\r\n.*annota1.c\r\n\032\032frame-source-file-end\r\n:\r\n\032\032frame-source-line\r\n$main_line\r\n\032\032frame-source-end\r\n\r\n\r\n\032\032source.*$srcfile:$main_line:.*:beg:$hex\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032stopped.*$gdb_prompt$" {
+ -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\nStarting program: $binexp \(\r\nwarning: Skipping \[^\r\n\]+ .gdb_index section in \[^\r\n\]+\r\nDo \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" before the file is read\r\nto use the section anyway\\.\)?\(\(\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\)|\(\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\)\)+\r\n\r\n\032\032starting\(\(\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\)|\(\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\)\)*\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoint 1\r\n\r\nBreakpoint 1, \r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-function-name\r\nmain\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(\\)\r\n\032\032frame-source-begin\r\n at \r\n\032\032frame-source-file\r\n.*annota1.c\r\n\032\032frame-source-file-end\r\n:\r\n\032\032frame-source-line\r\n$main_line\r\n\032\032frame-source-end\r\n\r\n\r\n\032\032source.*$srcfile:$main_line:.*:beg:$hex\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032stopped.*$gdb_prompt$" {
pass "run until main breakpoint"
}
}
--- src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/async-shell.exp 2012/03/16 16:47:33 1.5
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/async-shell.exp 2012/07/27 21:34:30 1.6
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
return -1
}
-set gdbindex_warning_re "warning: Skipping \[^\r\n\]+ \\.gdb_index section \[^\r\n\]*"
+set gdbindex_warning_re "warning: Skipping \[^\r\n\]+ \\.gdb_index section \[^\r\n\]*\r\nDo \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" before the file is read\r\nto use the section anyway\\."
gdb_test_no_output "set target-async on "
gdb_test_no_output "set non-stop on"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-27 21:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-17 21:24 [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections dje
2012-07-17 21:43 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-17 22:10 ` Doug Evans
2012-07-18 22:34 ` dje
2012-07-18 23:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-18 23:53 ` dje
2012-07-19 7:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-19 16:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-07-19 16:28 ` Doug Evans
2012-07-19 16:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-07-19 18:26 ` dje
2012-07-19 19:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-07-20 18:01 ` dje
2012-07-25 14:33 ` [patch] testsuite: Fix gdb.mi/* regression on RHEL-6 [Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections] Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-25 20:36 ` [commit+7.5] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-27 21:39 ` [commit#2+7.5] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-19 16:11 ` [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections Eli Zaretskii
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox