From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6384 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2012 07:03:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 6363 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2012 07:03:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:03:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6J73BdJ028851 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 03:03:11 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-30.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.30]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6J737pm025578 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 03:03:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:03:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: dje@google.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections Message-ID: <20120719070304.GA9256@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120717214257.GA9394@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20487.14790.662664.583456@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <20120718233303.GA32519@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20487.19536.142661.229373@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20487.19536.142661.229373@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00316.txt.bz2 On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:52:48 +0200, dje@google.com wrote: > Maybe it should be phrased as > <-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"> Yes, I find it more clear to the user FYI although I respect Eli's opinion on the subject. Thanks, Jan