From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-92900-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10966 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2012 16:45:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 10954 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2012 16:45:28 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:45:10 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M7F005002G6I600@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:45:06 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M7F004RC2J6Y6C0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:45:06 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:45:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA, doc RFA] New option set use-deprecated-index-sections
In-reply-to: <CADPb22R2x0GfA2XnpFmtNoBjfo9ChDmq1ZHgb9hQG1+rDS9JNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83hat38ztr.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <yjt28vei2iag.fsf@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <20120717214257.GA9394@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20487.14790.662664.583456@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <20120718233303.GA32519@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83liif91io.fsf@gnu.org> <CADPb22R2x0GfA2XnpFmtNoBjfo9ChDmq1ZHgb9hQG1+rDS9JNA@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:27:46 -0700
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:33:03 +0200
> >> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org
> >>
> >> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:33:42 +0200, dje@google.com wrote:
> >> > +  use "-iex 'set use-deprecated-index-sections on'".
> >> [...]
> >> > +`-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
> >>
> >> It is more Eli's decision but I would find it overquoted.
> >
> > How about removing that sentence altogether?  We have no reason to
> > advertise -iex in that particular warning message.
> 
> I'd like to keep the content of the warning.

The text you suggested is:

  	  warning (_("\
  Skipping deprecated .gdb_index section in %s.\n\
  Do \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\" to use them anyway.\n\
  This can be done from the command line by passing\n\
  `-iex \"set use-deprecated-index-sections on\"' to gdb."),
	     filename);

I'm saying that mentioning the "set" command is enough, no need to
also say that the command can be invoked through -iex, because _any_
GDB command can be invoked like that.

That said, I won't argue.