* Use is_stopped, instead of !is_running
@ 2008-07-29 13:59 Pedro Alves
2008-07-29 15:59 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-08-09 14:31 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2008-07-29 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 601 bytes --]
This patches fixes a couple of left over instances of !is_running to use
is_stopped instead, and adds a missing check for is_exited in
get_selected_block, which I tripped on while development the yet
unsubmitted non-stop remote target.
I'm adding more comments to gdbthread.h to describe why. Basically,
the thread state is not a boolean anymore.
I'll soon post a description of these states in the internal manual
under the currently empty section 3.5 - Thread Handling. Let me
know if it should be placed somewhere else.
Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu sync and async.
OK?
--
Pedro Alves
[-- Attachment #2: is_stopped_is_running.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3989 bytes --]
2008-07-29 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
* gdbthread.h: Add comments.
* stack.c (get_selected_block): Return 0 on an exited thread.
* top.c (execute_command): Check for is_stopped, not !is_running.
* event-top.c (command_handler): Likewise.
---
gdb/event-top.c | 2 +-
gdb/gdbthread.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
gdb/stack.c | 3 +++
gdb/top.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/gdbthread.h
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/gdbthread.h 2008-07-29 13:25:21.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/gdbthread.h 2008-07-29 13:25:42.000000000 +0100
@@ -210,21 +210,40 @@ extern void switch_to_thread (ptid_t pti
If PIDGET (PTID) is -1, marks all threads. */
extern void set_running (ptid_t ptid, int running);
-/* Reports if thread PTID is known to be running right now. */
-extern int is_running (ptid_t ptid);
+/* NOTE: Since the thread state is not a boolean, most times, you do
+ not want to check it with negation. If you really want to check if
+ the thread is stopped,
-/* Reports if any thread is known to be running right now. */
-extern int any_running (void);
+ use (good):
+
+ if (is_stopped (ptid))
+
+ instead of (bad):
+
+ if (!is_running (ptid))
+
+ The latter also returns true on exited threads, most likelly not
+ what you want. */
+
+/* Reports if in the frontend's perpective, thread PTID is running. */
+extern int is_running (ptid_t ptid);
/* Is this thread listed, but known to have exited? We keep it listed
(but not visible) until it's safe to delete. */
extern int is_exited (ptid_t ptid);
-/* Is this thread stopped? */
+/* In the frontend's perpective, is this thread stopped? */
extern int is_stopped (ptid_t ptid);
-/* Marks thread PTID as executing, or as stopped.
- If PIDGET (PTID) is -1, marks all threads. */
+/* In the frontend's perpective is there any thread running? */
+extern int any_running (void);
+
+/* Marks thread PTID as executing, or not. If PIDGET (PTID) is -1,
+ marks all threads.
+
+ Note that this is different from the running state. See the
+ description of state_ and executing_ fields of struct
+ thread_info. */
extern void set_executing (ptid_t ptid, int executing);
/* Reports if thread PTID is executing. */
Index: src/gdb/stack.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/stack.c 2008-07-29 13:25:21.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/stack.c 2008-07-29 13:25:42.000000000 +0100
@@ -1644,6 +1644,9 @@ get_selected_block (CORE_ADDR *addr_in_b
if (!target_has_stack)
return 0;
+ if (is_exited (inferior_ptid))
+ return 0;
+
if (is_executing (inferior_ptid))
return 0;
Index: src/gdb/top.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/top.c 2008-07-29 13:25:21.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/top.c 2008-07-29 13:25:42.000000000 +0100
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ Cannot execute this command without a li
/* FIXME: This should be cacheing the frame and only running when
the frame changes. */
- if (target_has_stack && !is_running (inferior_ptid))
+ if (target_has_stack && is_stopped (inferior_ptid))
{
flang = get_frame_language ();
if (!warned
Index: src/gdb/event-top.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/event-top.c 2008-07-29 13:25:21.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/event-top.c 2008-07-29 13:25:42.000000000 +0100
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ command_handler (char *command)
/* Do any commands attached to breakpoint we stopped at. Only if we
are always running synchronously. Or if we have just executed a
command that doesn't start the target. */
- if (!target_can_async_p () || !is_running (inferior_ptid))
+ if (!target_can_async_p () || is_stopped (inferior_ptid))
{
bpstat_do_actions (&stop_bpstat);
do_cleanups (old_chain);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: Use is_stopped, instead of !is_running
2008-07-29 13:59 Use is_stopped, instead of !is_running Pedro Alves
@ 2008-07-29 15:59 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-07-29 16:32 ` Pedro Alves
2008-08-09 14:31 ` Joel Brobecker
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann @ 2008-07-29 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 14:59 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I'm adding more comments to gdbthread.h to describe why. Basically,
> the thread state is not a boolean anymore.
If the thread state is not a boolean, then IMHO offering convenient
functions which treat it as such and then putting a warning in the
comment is really setting up a subtle trap for GDB hackers... :-)
What about just nuking is_running and is_stopping, and making everybody
use is_thread_state directly? That would make this reality explicit.
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Use is_stopped, instead of !is_running
2008-07-29 15:59 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
@ 2008-07-29 16:32 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2008-07-29 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 16:59:08, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> If the thread state is not a boolean, then IMHO offering convenient
> functions which treat it as such and then putting a warning in the
> comment is really setting up a subtle trap for GDB hackers... :-)
>
> What about just nuking is_running and is_stopping, and making everybody
> use is_thread_state directly? That would make this reality explicit.
It might not look like it, but I'm doing baby steps in that
direction. :-)
There are target_has_execution checks inside the is_XXX
functions that I'd like to cleanly get rid of.
--
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Use is_stopped, instead of !is_running
2008-07-29 13:59 Use is_stopped, instead of !is_running Pedro Alves
2008-07-29 15:59 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
@ 2008-08-09 14:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-08-16 23:54 ` Pedro Alves
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2008-08-09 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb-patches
> 2008-07-29 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
>
> * gdbthread.h: Add comments.
> * stack.c (get_selected_block): Return 0 on an exited thread.
> * top.c (execute_command): Check for is_stopped, not !is_running.
> * event-top.c (command_handler): Likewise.
Looks OK to me. It took me a while to decide that it was OK to leave
one instance inside inf-loop.c, but I think the !is_running there is OK.
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Use is_stopped, instead of !is_running
2008-08-09 14:31 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2008-08-16 23:54 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2008-08-16 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Joel Brobecker
On Saturday 09 August 2008 15:30:45, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > 2008-07-29 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > * gdbthread.h: Add comments.
> > * stack.c (get_selected_block): Return 0 on an exited thread.
> > * top.c (execute_command): Check for is_stopped, not !is_running.
> > * event-top.c (command_handler): Likewise.
>
> Looks OK to me. It took me a while to decide that it was OK to leave
> one instance inside inf-loop.c, but I think the !is_running there is OK.
Yeah, it actually also took me a while to decide what to do with that
check, and it's just for a log printf.
Thanks, Joel, I checked it in. I'm posting an internal docs blurb
about these states next.
--
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-16 23:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-29 13:59 Use is_stopped, instead of !is_running Pedro Alves
2008-07-29 15:59 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-07-29 16:32 ` Pedro Alves
2008-08-09 14:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-08-16 23:54 ` Pedro Alves
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox