Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:47:09PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 05:55:07PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> >
> >>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:05:59PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>This patch is now in mainline.  Is there anything else you need?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yes.  Two sets of questions left, one for Jeff and one [plus a little
> >>>bit] for you...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Jeff, one test still fails: calling addprint.  I think this is mostly a
> >>>GDB problem rather than GCC.  Before starting the program I see this:
> >>>
> >>
> >>Let me take a look at it.  It is not failing in my all-patches-applied 
> >>build. Perhaps in splitting the patches up, I screwed up and missed 
> >>something.
> >
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> 
> Ok, I figured out what piece I left out and have remade the patch.  I can't 
> remember where we are on this regarding the workaround for gcc debug-info, 
> but at least you will be able to run the test with the full functionality 
> now. Please let me know what is needed next as I want to move this forward.

Hi Jeff,

With Andrew's latest GCJ change, you can remove the bit I objected to for
method names.  After that I'm happy with the patch.  A dwarf2read
maintainer will need to have final review on the dwarf2read bits, so
you may want to post a final patch and ping them.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz