From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040623160805.GA32457@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16601.43621.899821.519555@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 05:05:57PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > The other question: I looked at fixing the debug info to print field
> > names correctly. The reason it's wrong is that dwarf2out uses the
> > decl_printable_name langhook. Java doesn't use the second argument,
> > which the common code assumes is verbosity. Common code always passes
> > '2', which matches what Java's does, except in three places: mudflap
> > (???), the C tree pretty printer, and this call in dwarf2out used to
> > set the name of decls. Java mostly passes 0 since it knows the value
> > is ignored. Any reason not to fix up the Java frontend to pass 2,
> > extend the function to handle smaller values, and thus correct the
> > debug output?
>
> Yes, I can do that.
Great - it'll probably take you a lot less time than it would take me
:) If you can take care of this, I'll make sure GDB still behaves
correctly.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-23 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-17 20:53 Jeff Johnston
2004-06-11 17:49 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-06-17 3:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-17 20:52 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-06-19 23:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-21 10:49 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-21 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-23 11:06 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-23 13:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-23 16:06 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-23 16:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-06-23 21:55 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-06-23 23:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-24 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2004-07-06 21:47 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-07-26 19:49 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-07-26 19:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-02 10:17 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-02 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-02 20:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-03 18:45 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-16 13:08 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-16 13:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-16 20:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-16 20:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-24 18:53 ` [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 3 Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24 19:05 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 19:28 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24 19:10 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 19:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-01 4:51 ` Jim Blandy
2004-09-09 23:41 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-10 20:12 ` Jim Blandy
2004-09-15 22:58 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-20 18:23 ` Jim Blandy
2004-09-20 20:19 ` Jeff Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040623160805.GA32457@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox