From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 15:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16654.23217.847150.837143@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16654.5193.518989.691842@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Andrew Haley writes:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:49:30PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > > Ping.
> >
> > I was waiting for Andrew to try fixing up gcj so that we could avoid
> > the method name problem. Andrew, are you going to have time to do
> > that, or should we pursue the hack for now after all? I'd much rather
> > it be fixed.
>
> Sorry Daniel, I've been away. You are right: it should be fixed in
> gcc. I will do this as soon as I get stuff sorted out.
Okay, I've made a patch but I'm not sure it's what you want.
This is a snippet from a typical file:
.long 0x9ca | .long 0x851
.byte 0x1 .byte 0x1
.string "java.lang.Class.forName(java.lang.String)" | .string "forName"
.byte 0x3 .byte 0x3
Is that what you want? I've only made the change for method names;
field names are as before.
Andrew.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-02 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-17 20:53 Jeff Johnston
2004-06-11 17:49 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-06-17 3:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-17 20:52 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-06-19 23:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-21 10:49 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-21 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-23 11:06 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-23 13:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-23 16:06 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-23 16:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-23 21:55 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-06-23 23:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-24 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2004-07-06 21:47 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-07-26 19:49 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-07-26 19:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-02 10:17 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-02 15:17 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
2004-08-02 20:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-03 18:45 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-16 13:08 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-16 13:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-16 20:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-16 20:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-24 18:53 ` [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 3 Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24 19:05 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 19:28 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24 19:10 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 19:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-01 4:51 ` Jim Blandy
2004-09-09 23:41 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-10 20:12 ` Jim Blandy
2004-09-15 22:58 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-20 18:23 ` Jim Blandy
2004-09-20 20:19 ` Jeff Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16654.23217.847150.837143@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox