From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-34800-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17153 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2004 15:17:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17124 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2004 15:17:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com) (81.96.64.123)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Aug 2004 15:17:39 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i72FG42v015333;
	Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:16:05 +0100
Received: (from aph@localhost)
	by redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i72FG1Sa015327;
	Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:16:01 +0100
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16654.23217.847150.837143@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 15:17:00 -0000
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>,
   gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2
In-Reply-To: <16654.5193.518989.691842@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <20040617030603.GC23443@nevyn.them.org>
	<40D20494.2020608@redhat.com>
	<20040619235857.GA18759@nevyn.them.org>
	<16598.64375.217285.743094@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
	<16601.25623.949217.642524@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
	<20040623134742.GA24612@nevyn.them.org>
	<40D9FC3B.3030700@redhat.com>
	<20040623230138.GA6426@nevyn.them.org>
	<40EB1DDD.4070603@redhat.com>
	<4105604A.6030302@redhat.com>
	<20040726194953.GA27001@nevyn.them.org>
	<16654.5193.518989.691842@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2

Andrew Haley writes:
 > Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
 >  > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:49:30PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote:
 >  > > Ping.
 >  > 
 >  > I was waiting for Andrew to try fixing up gcj so that we could avoid
 >  > the method name problem.  Andrew, are you going to have time to do
 >  > that, or should we pursue the hack for now after all?  I'd much rather
 >  > it be fixed.
 > 
 > Sorry Daniel, I've been away.  You are right: it should be fixed in
 > gcc.  I will do this as soon as I get stuff sorted out.

Okay, I've made a patch but I'm not sure it's what you want.

This is a snippet from a typical file:

        .long   0x9ca                                         |         .long   0x851
        .byte   0x1                                                     .byte   0x1
        .string "java.lang.Class.forName(java.lang.String)"   |         .string "forName"
        .byte   0x3                                                     .byte   0x3

Is that what you want?  I've only made the change for method names;
field names are as before.

Andrew.