From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <873c4kq29c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040623230138.GA6426@nevyn.them.org>
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
Daniel> In C++, the debug information marks whether a constructor was written
Daniel> by the user (i.e. the type really contains a constructor) or by the
Daniel> compiler (i.e. implicit). I imagine Java's debug information has the
Daniel> same thing.
The information is there, though I don't know whether gcj puts it
into the .o.
Daniel> (This shouldn't affect breakpointing it for users who know the
Daniel> constructor exists.)
It is also actually useful on occasion to put a breakpoint on <clinit>.
This can let you see when your class is initialized, and it will let
you step through the static blocks and static field initializers.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-24 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-17 20:53 Jeff Johnston
2004-06-11 17:49 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-06-17 3:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-17 20:52 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-06-19 23:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-21 10:49 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-21 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-23 11:06 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-23 13:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-23 16:06 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-23 16:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-23 21:55 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-06-23 23:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-24 17:57 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2004-07-06 21:47 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-07-26 19:49 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-07-26 19:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-02 10:17 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-02 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-02 20:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-03 18:45 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-16 13:08 ` Andrew Haley
2004-08-16 13:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-16 20:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-16 20:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-24 18:53 ` [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 3 Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24 19:05 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 19:28 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24 19:10 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 19:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-01 4:51 ` Jim Blandy
2004-09-09 23:41 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-10 20:12 ` Jim Blandy
2004-09-15 22:58 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-20 18:23 ` Jim Blandy
2004-09-20 20:19 ` Jeff Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=873c4kq29c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox