Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2

Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-16T20:35:03Z

On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:47:09PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 05:55:07PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> >
> >>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:05:59PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>This patch is now in mainline. Is there anything else you need?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yes. Two sets of questions left, one for Jeff and one [plus a little
> >>>bit] for you...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Jeff, one test still fails: calling addprint. I think this is mostly a
> >>>GDB problem rather than GCC. Before starting the program I see this:
> >>>
> >>
> >>Let me take a look at it. It is not failing in my all-patches-applied
> >>build. Perhaps in splitting the patches up, I screwed up and missed
> >>something.
> >
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
>
> Ok, I figured out what piece I left out and have remade the patch. I can't
> remember where we are on this regarding the workaround for gcc debug-info,
> but at least you will be able to run the test with the full functionality
> now. Please let me know what is needed next as I want to move this forward.

Hi Jeff,

With Andrew's latest GCJ change, you can remove the bit I objected to for
method names. After that I'm happy with the patch. A dwarf2read
maintainer will need to have final review on the dwarf2read bits, so
you may want to post a final patch and ping them.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz