From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18958 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2004 20:35:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18950 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2004 20:35:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2004 20:35:02 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BwoC6-0003zt-DN; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:35:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:35:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jeff Johnston Cc: Andrew Haley , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2 Message-ID: <20040816203502.GB14885@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Johnston , Andrew Haley , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <40A9264C.4060404@redhat.com> <20040617030603.GC23443@nevyn.them.org> <40D20494.2020608@redhat.com> <20040619235857.GA18759@nevyn.them.org> <16598.64375.217285.743094@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <16601.25623.949217.642524@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <20040623134742.GA24612@nevyn.them.org> <40D9FC3B.3030700@redhat.com> <20040623230138.GA6426@nevyn.them.org> <40EB1DDD.4070603@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40EB1DDD.4070603@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00546.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:47:09PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 05:55:07PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: > > > >>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> > >>>On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:05:59PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>This patch is now in mainline. Is there anything else you need? > >>> > >>> > >>>Yes. Two sets of questions left, one for Jeff and one [plus a little > >>>bit] for you... > >>> > >>> > >>>Jeff, one test still fails: calling addprint. I think this is mostly a > >>>GDB problem rather than GCC. Before starting the program I see this: > >>> > >> > >>Let me take a look at it. It is not failing in my all-patches-applied > >>build. Perhaps in splitting the patches up, I screwed up and missed > >>something. > > > > > >Thanks. > > > > Ok, I figured out what piece I left out and have remade the patch. I can't > remember where we are on this regarding the workaround for gcc debug-info, > but at least you will be able to run the test with the full functionality > now. Please let me know what is needed next as I want to move this forward. Hi Jeff, With Andrew's latest GCJ change, you can remove the bit I objected to for method names. After that I'm happy with the patch. A dwarf2read maintainer will need to have final review on the dwarf2read bits, so you may want to post a final patch and ping them. -- Daniel Jacobowitz