* [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout @ 2018-12-04 11:33 Andrew Burgess 2018-12-04 15:43 ` Simon Marchi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Andrew Burgess @ 2018-12-04 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Andrew Burgess In the config/sim.exp file two functions are defined. Both of these functions define local timeout variables and then call gdb_expect, which (through a call to get_largest_timeout) will find the local definition of timeout. However, both of these functions set the local timeout to some arbitrary value and print a log message for this "new" timeout just before returning. As in both cases, the timeout is a local variable, this final setting of the timeout has no effect and can be removed. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * config/sim.exp (gdb_target_sim): Remove redundant adjustment of local timeout variable before return. (gdb_load): Likewise. --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ gdb/testsuite/config/sim.exp | 4 ---- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/config/sim.exp b/gdb/testsuite/config/sim.exp index d9072febc6a..47146c6662e 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/config/sim.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/config/sim.exp @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ proc gdb_target_sim { } { return -1 } } - set timeout 10 - verbose "Timeout is now $timeout seconds" 2 return 0 } @@ -67,8 +65,6 @@ proc gdb_load { arg } { if $verbose>1 then { send_user "Loaded $arg into $GDB\n" } - set timeout 30 - verbose "Timeout is now $timeout seconds" 2 return 0 } -re "$gdb_prompt $" { -- 2.14.5 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout 2018-12-04 11:33 [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout Andrew Burgess @ 2018-12-04 15:43 ` Simon Marchi 2018-12-04 15:54 ` Pedro Alves 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Marchi @ 2018-12-04 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Burgess; +Cc: gdb-patches On 2018-12-04 06:33, Andrew Burgess wrote: > In the config/sim.exp file two functions are defined. Both of these > functions define local timeout variables and then call gdb_expect, > which (through a call to get_largest_timeout) will find the local > definition of timeout. > > However, both of these functions set the local timeout to some > arbitrary value and print a log message for this "new" timeout just > before returning. > > As in both cases, the timeout is a local variable, this final setting > of the timeout has no effect and can be removed. Hi Andrew, Can you verify whether the remaining "set timeout" in those functions have any effect at all? As you said, they are just local variables, so I don't expect them to influence the behavior of gdb_expect. Either we need "global timeout", or we pass the timeout directly as an argument to gdb_expect (the latter sounds better). Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout 2018-12-04 15:43 ` Simon Marchi @ 2018-12-04 15:54 ` Pedro Alves 2018-12-04 16:08 ` Simon Marchi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Pedro Alves @ 2018-12-04 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Marchi, Andrew Burgess; +Cc: gdb-patches On 12/04/2018 03:43 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 2018-12-04 06:33, Andrew Burgess wrote: >> In the config/sim.exp file two functions are defined. Both of these >> functions define local timeout variables and then call gdb_expect, >> which (through a call to get_largest_timeout) will find the local >> definition of timeout. >> >> However, both of these functions set the local timeout to some >> arbitrary value and print a log message for this "new" timeout just >> before returning. >> >> As in both cases, the timeout is a local variable, this final setting >> of the timeout has no effect and can be removed. > > Hi Andrew, > > Can you verify whether the remaining "set timeout" in those functions have any effect at all? As you said, they are just local variables, so I don't expect them to influence the behavior of gdb_expect. Either we need "global timeout", or we pass the timeout directly as an argument to gdb_expect (the latter sounds better). Keep this in mind, from man expect: Expect takes a rather liberal view of scoping. In particular, variables read by commands specific to the Expect program will be sought first from the local scope, and if not found, in the global scope. For example, this obviates the need to place "global timeout" in every procedure you write that uses expect. On the other hand, variables written are always in the local scope (unless a "global" command has been issued). The most common problem this causes is when spawn is executed in a procedure. Outside the procedure, spawn_id no longer exists, so the spawned process is no longer accessible simply because of scoping. Add a "global spawn_id" to such a procedure. Mimicking that behavior, gdb_test, gdb_test_multiple and gdb_expect pick the local timeout variable in the caller via upvar. E.g.: proc gdb_test { args } { global gdb_prompt upvar timeout timeout gdb_expect is a little more disguised, but it does the same, here, in the get_largest_timeout path: proc gdb_expect { args } { ... # A timeout argument takes precedence, otherwise of all the timeouts # select the largest. if [info exists atimeout] { set tmt $atimeout } else { set tmt [get_largest_timeout] } ... } and then get_largest_timeout does: proc get_largest_timeout {} { upvar #0 timeout gtimeout upvar 2 timeout timeout ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ... Thanks, Pedro Alves ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout 2018-12-04 15:54 ` Pedro Alves @ 2018-12-04 16:08 ` Simon Marchi 2018-12-04 16:11 ` Pedro Alves 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Marchi @ 2018-12-04 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: Andrew Burgess, gdb-patches On 2018-12-04 10:54, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 12/04/2018 03:43 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: >> On 2018-12-04 06:33, Andrew Burgess wrote: >>> In the config/sim.exp file two functions are defined. Both of these >>> functions define local timeout variables and then call gdb_expect, >>> which (through a call to get_largest_timeout) will find the local >>> definition of timeout. >>> >>> However, both of these functions set the local timeout to some >>> arbitrary value and print a log message for this "new" timeout just >>> before returning. >>> >>> As in both cases, the timeout is a local variable, this final setting >>> of the timeout has no effect and can be removed. >> >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Can you verify whether the remaining "set timeout" in those functions >> have any effect at all? As you said, they are just local variables, >> so I don't expect them to influence the behavior of gdb_expect. >> Either we need "global timeout", or we pass the timeout directly as an >> argument to gdb_expect (the latter sounds better). > > Keep this in mind, from man expect: > > Expect takes a rather liberal view of scoping. In > particular, > variables read by commands specific to the Expect program will > be sought > first from the local scope, and if not found, in the global > scope. For > example, this obviates the need to place "global timeout" in > every procedure > you write that uses expect. On the other hand, variables > written are always > in the local scope (unless a "global" command has been issued). > The most > common problem this causes is when spawn is executed in a > procedure. Outside > the procedure, spawn_id no longer exists, so the spawned > process is no longer > accessible simply because of scoping. Add a "global spawn_id" > to such a procedure. > > > Mimicking that behavior, gdb_test, gdb_test_multiple and gdb_expect > pick the > local timeout variable in the caller via upvar. E.g.: > > proc gdb_test { args } { > global gdb_prompt > upvar timeout timeout > > gdb_expect is a little more disguised, but it does the same, here, > in the get_largest_timeout path: > > proc gdb_expect { args } { > ... > # A timeout argument takes precedence, otherwise of all the > timeouts > # select the largest. > if [info exists atimeout] { > set tmt $atimeout > } else { > set tmt [get_largest_timeout] > } > ... > } > > and then get_largest_timeout does: > > proc get_largest_timeout {} { > upvar #0 timeout gtimeout > upvar 2 timeout timeout > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > ... That's very confusing, to say the least. Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout 2018-12-04 16:08 ` Simon Marchi @ 2018-12-04 16:11 ` Pedro Alves 2018-12-04 16:15 ` Simon Marchi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Pedro Alves @ 2018-12-04 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Marchi; +Cc: Andrew Burgess, gdb-patches On 12/04/2018 04:08 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 2018-12-04 10:54, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 12/04/2018 03:43 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: >>> On 2018-12-04 06:33, Andrew Burgess wrote: >>>> In the config/sim.exp file two functions are defined. Both of these >>>> functions define local timeout variables and then call gdb_expect, >>>> which (through a call to get_largest_timeout) will find the local >>>> definition of timeout. >>>> >>>> However, both of these functions set the local timeout to some >>>> arbitrary value and print a log message for this "new" timeout just >>>> before returning. >>>> >>>> As in both cases, the timeout is a local variable, this final setting >>>> of the timeout has no effect and can be removed. >>> >>> Hi Andrew, >>> >>> Can you verify whether the remaining "set timeout" in those functions have any effect at all? As you said, they are just local variables, so I don't expect them to influence the behavior of gdb_expect. Either we need "global timeout", or we pass the timeout directly as an argument to gdb_expect (the latter sounds better). >> >> Keep this in mind, from man expect: >> >>       Expect takes a rather liberal view of scoping. In particular, >>       variables read by commands specific to the Expect program will be sought >>       first from the local scope, and if not found, in the global scope. For >>       example, this obviates the need to place "global timeout" in >> every procedure >>       you write that uses expect.  On the other hand, variables >> written are always >>       in the local scope (unless a "global" command has been issued). The most >>       common problem this causes is when spawn is executed in a >> procedure. Outside >>       the procedure, spawn_id no longer exists, so the spawned >> process is no longer >>       accessible simply because of scoping. Add a "global spawn_id" >> to such a procedure. >> >> >> Mimicking that behavior, gdb_test, gdb_test_multiple and gdb_expect pick the >> local timeout variable in the caller via upvar. E.g.: >> >> proc gdb_test { args } { >>    global gdb_prompt >>    upvar timeout timeout >> >> gdb_expect is a little more disguised, but it does the same, here, >> in the get_largest_timeout path: >> >> proc gdb_expect { args } { >> ... >>    # A timeout argument takes precedence, otherwise of all the timeouts >>    # select the largest. >>    if [info exists atimeout] { >>     set tmt $atimeout >>    } else { >>     set tmt [get_largest_timeout] >>    } >> ... >> } >> >> and then get_largest_timeout does: >> >> proc get_largest_timeout {} { >>    upvar #0 timeout gtimeout >>    upvar 2 timeout timeout >>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>    ... > > That's very confusing, to say the least. Don't shoot the messenger. :-) Thanks, Pedro Alves ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout 2018-12-04 16:11 ` Pedro Alves @ 2018-12-04 16:15 ` Simon Marchi 2018-12-04 16:33 ` Pedro Alves 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Marchi @ 2018-12-04 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: Andrew Burgess, gdb-patches On 2018-12-04 11:11, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 12/04/2018 04:08 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: >> That's very confusing, to say the least. > > Don't shoot the messenger. :-) Hehe, of course. In light of this information, I think Andrew's patch is fine. Do you? Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout 2018-12-04 16:15 ` Simon Marchi @ 2018-12-04 16:33 ` Pedro Alves 2018-12-04 21:34 ` Andrew Burgess 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Pedro Alves @ 2018-12-04 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Marchi; +Cc: Andrew Burgess, gdb-patches On 12/04/2018 04:15 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 2018-12-04 11:11, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 12/04/2018 04:08 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: >>> That's very confusing, to say the least. >> >> Don't shoot the messenger. :-) > > Hehe, of course. > > In light of this information, I think Andrew's patch is fine. Do you? Sort of. At least with the removing the tail "set timeout" part, I agree it's not doing anything. As for the verbose call, we print "Timeout is now ..." messages in a lot of places, and if you're looking at the log, I think seeing a "Timeout is now ..." indication without seeing it changed again reads like the timeout was never restored... That's a preexisting problem, of course, since currently we give the impression that we actually changed the timeout at the end of the function but we actually didn't... Still, IMHO, one of these would be a better change: a) - remove the initial verbose call too, or, b) - add "global timeout" at the start of the function, and restore the on-entry value on exit. That way both "Timeout is now ..." messages will be truthful. This is what e.g., testsuiteconfig/sid.exp does. In either case, there will be no imbalance in the verbose output. Thanks, Pedro Alves ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout 2018-12-04 16:33 ` Pedro Alves @ 2018-12-04 21:34 ` Andrew Burgess 2018-12-04 23:03 ` Pedro Alves 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Andrew Burgess @ 2018-12-04 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: Simon Marchi, gdb-patches * Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> [2018-12-04 16:33:20 +0000]: > On 12/04/2018 04:15 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > > On 2018-12-04 11:11, Pedro Alves wrote: > >> On 12/04/2018 04:08 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > >>> That's very confusing, to say the least. > >> > >> Don't shoot the messenger. :-) > > > > Hehe, of course. > > > > In light of this information, I think Andrew's patch is fine. Do you? > Sort of. At least with the removing the tail "set timeout" part, > I agree it's not doing anything. > > As for the verbose call, we print "Timeout is now ..." messages > in a lot of places, and if you're looking at the log, I think > seeing a "Timeout is now ..." indication without seeing it changed > again reads like the timeout was never restored... > > That's a preexisting problem, of course, since currently > we give the impression that we actually changed the timeout > at the end of the function but we actually didn't... > > Still, IMHO, one of these would be a better change: > > a) - remove the initial verbose call too, or, > b) - add "global timeout" at the start of the function, and restore > the on-entry value on exit. That way both "Timeout is now ..." > messages will be truthful. This is what e.g., > testsuiteconfig/sid.exp does. > > In either case, there will be no imbalance in the verbose output. Thanks both for the feedback. In the end I went for (a) - making timeout global, backing it up, etc just to print a log message seemed like overkill, especially when we adjust the timeout in lots of other places without any logging at all. With the logging gone, folding the timeout into the gdb_expect call seemed like an obvious cleanup. The new patch is below. Thanks, Andrew -- gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout In the config/sim.exp file two functions are defined. Both of these functions define local timeout variables and then call gdb_expect, which (through a call to get_largest_timeout) will find the local definition of timeout. However, both of these functions set the local timeout to some arbitrary value and print a log message for this "new" timeout just before returning. As in both cases, the timeout is a local variable, this final setting of the timeout has no effect and can be removed. As having log messages about the timeout being adjusted could cause confusion I've removed all logging related to timeouts in this function, timeouts are adjusted thoughout the testsuite without any logging, there doesn't seem to be any good reason why these functions should get their own logging. With the logging gone there seems to be little need to a local timeout variable at all, and so I've folded the local timeout directly into the call to gdb_expect. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * config/sim.exp (gdb_target_sim): Remove redundant adjustment of local timeout variable before return, and remove all local timeout variable entirely. (gdb_load): Likewise. --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ gdb/testsuite/config/sim.exp | 12 ++---------- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/config/sim.exp b/gdb/testsuite/config/sim.exp index d9072febc6a..fd4d506ebb8 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/config/sim.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/config/sim.exp @@ -26,9 +26,7 @@ proc gdb_target_sim { } { set target_sim_options "[board_info target gdb,target_sim_options]" send_gdb "target sim $target_sim_options\n" - set timeout 60 - verbose "Timeout is now $timeout seconds" 2 - gdb_expect { + gdb_expect 60 { -re "Connected to the simulator.*$gdb_prompt $" { verbose "Set target to sim" } @@ -37,8 +35,6 @@ proc gdb_target_sim { } { return -1 } } - set timeout 10 - verbose "Timeout is now $timeout seconds" 2 return 0 } @@ -60,15 +56,11 @@ proc gdb_load { arg } { if [gdb_target_sim] then { return -1 } send_gdb "load\n" - set timeout 2400 - verbose "Timeout is now $timeout seconds" 2 - gdb_expect { + gdb_expect 2400 { -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { if $verbose>1 then { send_user "Loaded $arg into $GDB\n" } - set timeout 30 - verbose "Timeout is now $timeout seconds" 2 return 0 } -re "$gdb_prompt $" { -- 2.14.5 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout 2018-12-04 21:34 ` Andrew Burgess @ 2018-12-04 23:03 ` Pedro Alves 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Pedro Alves @ 2018-12-04 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Burgess; +Cc: Simon Marchi, gdb-patches On 12/04/2018 09:34 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > Thanks both for the feedback. > > In the end I went for (a) - making timeout global, backing it up, etc > just to print a log message seemed like overkill, especially when we > adjust the timeout in lots of other places without any logging at all. > > With the logging gone, folding the timeout into the gdb_expect call > seemed like an obvious cleanup. > > The new patch is below. > Fine with me. > As having log messages about the timeout being adjusted could cause > confusion I've removed all logging related to timeouts in this > function, timeouts are adjusted thoughout the testsuite without any Typo: "throughout" Thanks, Pedro Alves ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-04 23:03 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-12-04 11:33 [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/sim: Remove redundant setting of timeout Andrew Burgess 2018-12-04 15:43 ` Simon Marchi 2018-12-04 15:54 ` Pedro Alves 2018-12-04 16:08 ` Simon Marchi 2018-12-04 16:11 ` Pedro Alves 2018-12-04 16:15 ` Simon Marchi 2018-12-04 16:33 ` Pedro Alves 2018-12-04 21:34 ` Andrew Burgess 2018-12-04 23:03 ` Pedro Alves
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox