Re: Gerrit request (Was: Change in binutils-gdb[master]: gdb.mi/list-thread-groups-available.exp: read entries one by one inst...)

[Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>]

On 2019-10-14 8:44 p.m., Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2019-10-14 2:06 p.m., Tom Tromey wrote:
>> Hi.  I've been looking at the gerrit review email.
>> I'd like to suggest a way it could be improved.
>>
>> Consider this review:
>>
>> Tom> https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/41/5/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/list-thread-groups-available.exp 
>> Tom> File gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/list-thread-groups-available.exp:
>>
>> Tom> https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/41/5/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/list-thread-groups-available.exp@74 
>> Tom> PS5, Line 74: 	pass $test
>> Tom> You could do pass $gdb_test_name and get rid of the test variable.
>>
>> This would be a lot better if the email included more of the patch
>> context.  As is, it's not very readable on the list.  While I do want to
>> use gerrit, at the same time I think it would be nice to be able to
>> following the mailing list and get a reasonably complete idea of what's
>> going on.
>>
>> Tom
> 
> I'll take a look if it's possible to modify the templates to do so.

It doesn't seem to be possible out of the box.  The template can only work
with the data passed by Gerrit.  For a line comment, we only get the single
line it refers to:

  https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit/+/refs/heads/master/java/com/google/gerrit/server/mail/send/CommentSender.java#328

Simon