Re: [PING][PATCH] Add shortcuts for "nexti" and "stepi" commands in Single-Key mode

[Ruslan Kabatsayev <b7.10110111@gmail.com>]

On 27 July 2017 at 11:19, Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> wrote:
> On 2017-07-27 07:59, Ruslan Kabatsayev wrote:
>>
>> On 26 July 2017 at 23:53, Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2017-07-26 21:19, Ruslan Kabatsayev wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, the patch seems to have been approved by one reviewer (see [1]). But
>>>> it
>>>> doesn't appear to have been pushed, nor do I have any further
>>>> instructions
>>>> on how to get it merged. What should I do?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ruslan,
>>>
>>> The patch is fine with me too, it seems to work well and it's a good
>>> idea.
>>>
>>> It might be a bit more work to implement (an idea for another patch
>>> maybe),
>>> but do you think it would be nice if n and s did next and step when
>>> focusing
>>> a source window, but did nexti and stepi when focusing an asm window?
>>> When
>>> in an asm window, I think you will much more likely want to use
>>> nexti/stepi
>>> than next/step, so maybe they should be bound to the n and s rather than
>>> N
>>> and S in that case?
>>
>> This sounds like a great idea. If this is implemented, do you think N
>> and S are then useless and confusing (since n/s would be
>> focus-dependent while N/S won't)?
>
>
> I was thinking that perhaps that when focusing...
>
> a source view: s/n do source line stepping, S/N do assembly stepping
> an asm view: s/n do assembly stepping, S/N do source line stepping
>
> Basically, they would switch role.  Is that too confusing?
This might be OK, but what if current focus in on registers window?
Disable all single-key stepping?
>
>>>
>>> In order to get the patch in, you have two choices: if you plan to
>>> contribute more in the future, we can get you write access to the repo,
>>> so
>>> that you can push your patches in once they are approved.  Otherwise, we
>>> can
>>> push it for you.  Let me know what you prefer.
>>
>> Yes, I do plan to contribute in the future.
>
>
> I'll send you the details in private.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Simon