Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>,
	Ruslan Kabatsayev <b7.10110111@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] Add shortcuts for "nexti" and "stepi" commands in Single-Key mode
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 21:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11715373.GM5IrkgxOV@ralph.baldwin.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2085ccb4878f1acccefb8aa2312f7c34@polymtl.ca>

On Friday, August 04, 2017 03:29:01 PM Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2017-08-04 07:48, Ruslan Kabatsayev wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > After using these shortcuts for some time I found that they are still
> > not best: one has to hold Shift in order to continuously step in
> > instruction mode. Would it be better to e.g. replace N->m, S->z? I
> > think we can basically use any non-occupied shortcuts here, they just
> > should be convenient, not necessarily be associated with "long"
> > version of the commands.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Ruslan
> 
> Ok, I understand how having to hold shift may not be so practical.
> 
> It would be nice if there was a pattern that made it easy to 
> remember/deduce the keys for stepi/nexti from the keys for step/next, 
> which are more obvious.  For example, if we used 'a' for stepi and 'b' 
> for nexti, the "instruction" versions of the keys would both be at the 
> left of their "non-instruction" counterpart.  That's with a 
> QWERTY-centric view though, maybe it doesn't make sense with other 
> layouts.

I agree it should be something deducible like a/b or d/m.


-- 
John Baldwin


      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-04 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-13  6:13 [PATCH] " Ruslan Kabatsayev
2017-07-13 15:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-13 18:19   ` Ruslan Kabatsayev
2017-07-13 19:04     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-13 19:09       ` Ruslan Kabatsayev
2017-07-13 19:41         ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-26 19:19 ` [PING][PATCH] " Ruslan Kabatsayev
2017-07-26 20:53   ` Simon Marchi
2017-07-27  6:00     ` Ruslan Kabatsayev
2017-07-27  8:19       ` Simon Marchi
2017-07-27  9:12         ` Ruslan Kabatsayev
2017-07-27  9:27           ` Simon Marchi
2017-08-04  5:48             ` Ruslan Kabatsayev
2017-08-04 13:29               ` Simon Marchi
2017-08-04 19:11                 ` Ruslan Kabatsayev
2017-08-04 21:04                 ` John Baldwin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11715373.GM5IrkgxOV@ralph.baldwin.cx \
    --to=jhb@freebsd.org \
    --cc=b7.10110111@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox