* [PATCH 0/2] Two small F_SETFL changes
@ 2026-07-17 17:07 Tom Tromey
2026-07-17 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] Don't use F_SETFL in gdbreplay Tom Tromey
2026-07-17 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] Use F_SETFL after F_SETOWN Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2026-07-17 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Tom Tromey
I was looking at the F_SETFL / SIGIO handling code in gdbserver
recently, and I noticed a couple of oddities.
This series fixes both of them. I wouldn't expect these patches to
really affect anything in practice.
Signed-off-by: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
---
Tom Tromey (2):
Don't use F_SETFL in gdbreplay
Use F_SETFL after F_SETOWN
gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc | 3 ---
gdbserver/remote-utils.cc | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: f8ebb8db3bd5bcfaeaa42f803fe15300e65196ee
change-id: 20260717-f-setfl-1556b2b5ed46
Best regards,
--
Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] Don't use F_SETFL in gdbreplay
2026-07-17 17:07 [PATCH 0/2] Two small F_SETFL changes Tom Tromey
@ 2026-07-17 17:07 ` Tom Tromey
2026-08-12 15:31 ` Simon Marchi
2026-07-17 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] Use F_SETFL after F_SETOWN Tom Tromey
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2026-07-17 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Tom Tromey
There's no need to call fcntl with F_SETFL in gdbreplay, as gdbreplay
does not use or need SIGIO.
---
gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc b/gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc
index 4426dc316ec..ba03bf64b67 100644
--- a/gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc
+++ b/gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc
@@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ remote_open (const char *name)
#endif
}
-#if defined(F_SETFL) && defined (FASYNC)
- fcntl (remote_desc_in, F_SETFL, FASYNC);
-#endif
remote_desc_out = remote_desc_in;
}
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] Use F_SETFL after F_SETOWN
2026-07-17 17:07 [PATCH 0/2] Two small F_SETFL changes Tom Tromey
2026-07-17 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] Don't use F_SETFL in gdbreplay Tom Tromey
@ 2026-07-17 17:07 ` Tom Tromey
2026-08-12 15:34 ` Simon Marchi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2026-07-17 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Tom Tromey
This changes enable_async_notification to use F_SETFL after F_SETOWN.
This order more correct because it ensures that the owning process is
set before the request to enable SIGIO.
---
gdbserver/remote-utils.cc | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdbserver/remote-utils.cc b/gdbserver/remote-utils.cc
index ffde4956776..e92adf903ce 100644
--- a/gdbserver/remote-utils.cc
+++ b/gdbserver/remote-utils.cc
@@ -128,13 +128,11 @@ static void
enable_async_notification (int fd)
{
#if defined(F_SETFL) && defined (FASYNC)
- int save_fcntl_flags;
-
- save_fcntl_flags = fcntl (fd, F_GETFL, 0);
- fcntl (fd, F_SETFL, save_fcntl_flags | FASYNC);
#if defined (F_SETOWN)
fcntl (fd, F_SETOWN, getpid ());
#endif
+ int save_fcntl_flags = fcntl (fd, F_GETFL, 0);
+ fcntl (fd, F_SETFL, save_fcntl_flags | FASYNC);
#endif
}
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] Don't use F_SETFL in gdbreplay
2026-07-17 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] Don't use F_SETFL in gdbreplay Tom Tromey
@ 2026-08-12 15:31 ` Simon Marchi
2026-08-12 19:17 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2026-08-12 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey, gdb-patches
On 7/17/26 1:07 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> There's no need to call fcntl with F_SETFL in gdbreplay, as gdbreplay
> does not use or need SIGIO.
> ---
> gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc b/gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc
> index 4426dc316ec..ba03bf64b67 100644
> --- a/gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc
> +++ b/gdbserver/gdbreplay.cc
> @@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ remote_open (const char *name)
> #endif
> }
>
> -#if defined(F_SETFL) && defined (FASYNC)
> - fcntl (remote_desc_in, F_SETFL, FASYNC);
> -#endif
> remote_desc_out = remote_desc_in;
LGTM, but also it looks like you could drop:
#if HAVE_FCNTL_H
#include <fcntl.h>
#endif
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use F_SETFL after F_SETOWN
2026-07-17 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] Use F_SETFL after F_SETOWN Tom Tromey
@ 2026-08-12 15:34 ` Simon Marchi
2026-08-12 19:17 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2026-08-12 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey, gdb-patches
On 7/17/26 1:07 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This changes enable_async_notification to use F_SETFL after F_SETOWN.
> This order more correct because it ensures that the owning process is
Missing "is".
> set before the request to enable SIGIO.
> ---
> gdbserver/remote-utils.cc | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdbserver/remote-utils.cc b/gdbserver/remote-utils.cc
> index ffde4956776..e92adf903ce 100644
> --- a/gdbserver/remote-utils.cc
> +++ b/gdbserver/remote-utils.cc
> @@ -128,13 +128,11 @@ static void
> enable_async_notification (int fd)
> {
> #if defined(F_SETFL) && defined (FASYNC)
> - int save_fcntl_flags;
> -
> - save_fcntl_flags = fcntl (fd, F_GETFL, 0);
> - fcntl (fd, F_SETFL, save_fcntl_flags | FASYNC);
> #if defined (F_SETOWN)
> fcntl (fd, F_SETOWN, getpid ());
> #endif
> + int save_fcntl_flags = fcntl (fd, F_GETFL, 0);
> + fcntl (fd, F_SETFL, save_fcntl_flags | FASYNC);
While touching these lines, could you maybe indent the inner #if and
#endif? Like:
#if defined(F_SETFL) && defined (FASYNC)
# if defined (F_SETOWN)
fcntl (fd, F_SETOWN, getpid ());
# endif
int save_fcntl_flags = fcntl (fd, F_GETFL, 0);
fcntl (fd, F_SETFL, save_fcntl_flags | FASYNC);
#endif
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] Don't use F_SETFL in gdbreplay
2026-08-12 15:31 ` Simon Marchi
@ 2026-08-12 19:17 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2026-08-12 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Marchi; +Cc: Tom Tromey, gdb-patches
Simon> LGTM, but also it looks like you could drop:
Simon> #if HAVE_FCNTL_H
Simon> #include <fcntl.h>
Simon> #endif
I did this.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use F_SETFL after F_SETOWN
2026-08-12 15:34 ` Simon Marchi
@ 2026-08-12 19:17 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2026-08-12 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Marchi; +Cc: Tom Tromey, gdb-patches
>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca> writes:
Simon> While touching these lines, could you maybe indent the inner #if and
Simon> #endif?
Sure thing.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-12 19:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-17 17:07 [PATCH 0/2] Two small F_SETFL changes Tom Tromey
2026-07-17 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] Don't use F_SETFL in gdbreplay Tom Tromey
2026-08-12 15:31 ` Simon Marchi
2026-08-12 19:17 ` Tom Tromey
2026-07-17 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] Use F_SETFL after F_SETOWN Tom Tromey
2026-08-12 15:34 ` Simon Marchi
2026-08-12 19:17 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox