Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consistently use BFD's time
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83wo9s4sac.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114210956.25115-3-tromey@adacore.com> (message from Tom	Tromey on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 14:09:55 -0700)

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
> Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 14:09:55 -0700
> 
> gdb uses the gnulib stat, while BFD does not.  This can lead to
> inconsistencies between the two, because the gnulib stat adjusts for
> timezones.

There's one more potential issue with Gnulib's replacement of 'fstat':
it also replaces the definition of 'struct stat', and it does that in
a way that might yield incompatibility between the definition on
<sys/stat.h> the system header and Gnulib's sys/stat.h replacement.
If gdb_bfd.c uses the Gnulib definition of 'struct stat' (as I think
we do everywhere in gdb/), then this replacement might create problems
on MinGW similar to those I reported to the Gnulib list (see the URL I
cited in an earlier message), because bfd_stat uses an incompatible
definition of 'struct stat'.

Of course, given that the Gnulib developers rejected my request not to
override the system definition of 'struct stat', GDB could also ignore
those problems, accepting their judgment.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-15 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-14 21:10 [PATCH 0/3] Fix gdb's BFD cache Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 21:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] Avoid hash table corruption in gdb_bfd.c Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 22:26   ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-14 21:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] Consistently use BFD's time Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 23:17   ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-15 17:51   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2020-01-16 20:47     ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-16 21:58       ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-16 22:31         ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-17  8:48         ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-17 18:32           ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-17 21:03             ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-18 11:07               ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-20 15:52                 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-20 15:53                   ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-20 20:50                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-20 20:58                     ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-21 15:50                       ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-21 19:38                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-21 17:56                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-23 22:05                   ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-19 17:51                   ` Tom Tromey
2020-04-01 20:20       ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-18 14:14     ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-18 15:04       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-18 16:00         ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-18 17:27           ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-18 17:32             ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-18 17:54               ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-19 12:02                 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-19 12:13                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-19 17:09                   ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-19 20:24                     ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-19 23:05                       ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-21 19:39                         ` Tom Tromey
2020-07-28 19:31                         ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-13 12:15                           ` Tom de Vries
2020-08-14 23:40                             ` Joel Brobecker
2020-08-23 16:09                               ` Joel Brobecker
2020-08-23 23:32                                 ` Pedro Alves
2020-08-24 20:04                                   ` Joel Brobecker
2020-09-02 14:45                                     ` Tom Tromey
2020-09-02 14:59                                       ` Joel Brobecker
2020-06-18 17:57               ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 22:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] Further simplify gdb BFD caching Tom Tromey
2020-01-23 22:30   ` Tom Tromey
2020-09-02 18:45     ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83wo9s4sac.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tromey@adacore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox