Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consistently use BFD's time

Tom Tromey
2020-04-01T20:22:24Z

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

[ system stat -vs- gnulib stat ]

Pedro> I think that we need to:

Pedro> - #undef stat before including bfd headers.
Pedro> - Redefine it afterwards back to rpl_stat (*)
Pedro> - add some kind of wrapper around bfd_stat (like maybe called gdb_bfd_stat)
Pedro> that handles the mismatch. Something like:

I read the thread again but I found it hard to figure out which
alternative of the ones presented is preferred.

Could you tell me which one it is?
I'd like to update these patches and fix the caching bug as well.

thanks,
Tom