Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consistently use BFD's time
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPTJ0XHn8DufO5n_MokADgZVWffjMFQ+0V84OyQ39NeFqYbo7A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114210956.25115-3-tromey@adacore.com>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:10 PM Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> gdb uses the gnulib stat, while BFD does not.  This can lead to
> inconsistencies between the two, because the gnulib stat adjusts for
> timezones.
>
> This patch changes gdb to use bfd_stat when examining a BFD's time.
> This avoids the problem; and also opens the door to caching target
> BFDs as well.
>
> One possible downside here is that gdb must now create a BFD before
> checking the cache.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog
> 2020-01-14  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>
>
>         * gdb_bfd.c (gdb_bfd_open): Use bfd_stat.
>         * symfile.c (reread_symbols): Use bfd_stat.
>
> Change-Id: Ie937630a221cbae15809c99327b47c1cbce141c0
> ---
>  gdb/ChangeLog |  5 +++++
>  gdb/gdb_bfd.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  gdb/symfile.c |  5 +----
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/gdb_bfd.c b/gdb/gdb_bfd.c
> index a1ee7814f32..26968396a15 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdb_bfd.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdb_bfd.c
> @@ -442,8 +442,15 @@ gdb_bfd_open (const char *name, const char *target, int fd)
>         }
>      }
>
> +  /* We open the BFD here so that we can use BFD to get the mtime.
> +     This is important because gdb uses the gnulib stat, but BFD does
> +     not, and this can lead to differences on some systems.  */

Maybe mention that mingw/windows is one of those?

Christian


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-14 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-14 21:10 [PATCH 0/3] Fix gdb's BFD cache Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 21:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] Avoid hash table corruption in gdb_bfd.c Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 22:26   ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-14 21:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] Consistently use BFD's time Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 23:17   ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches [this message]
2020-01-15 17:51   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-16 20:47     ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-16 21:58       ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-16 22:31         ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-17  8:48         ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-17 18:32           ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-17 21:03             ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-18 11:07               ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-20 15:52                 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-20 15:53                   ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-20 20:50                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-20 20:58                     ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-21 15:50                       ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-21 19:38                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-21 17:56                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-23 22:05                   ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-19 17:51                   ` Tom Tromey
2020-04-01 20:20       ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-18 14:14     ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-18 15:04       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-18 16:00         ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-18 17:27           ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-18 17:32             ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-18 17:54               ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-19 12:02                 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-19 12:13                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-19 17:09                   ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-19 20:24                     ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-19 23:05                       ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-21 19:39                         ` Tom Tromey
2020-07-28 19:31                         ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-13 12:15                           ` Tom de Vries
2020-08-14 23:40                             ` Joel Brobecker
2020-08-23 16:09                               ` Joel Brobecker
2020-08-23 23:32                                 ` Pedro Alves
2020-08-24 20:04                                   ` Joel Brobecker
2020-09-02 14:45                                     ` Tom Tromey
2020-09-02 14:59                                       ` Joel Brobecker
2020-06-18 17:57               ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 22:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] Further simplify gdb BFD caching Tom Tromey
2020-01-23 22:30   ` Tom Tromey
2020-09-02 18:45     ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPTJ0XHn8DufO5n_MokADgZVWffjMFQ+0V84OyQ39NeFqYbo7A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=cbiesinger@google.com \
    --cc=tromey@adacore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox