From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consistently use BFD's time
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:20:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sghnyn31.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f70b115f-bbae-c5c0-1d62-ae55eae84f62@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:37:28 +0000")
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
[ system stat -vs- gnulib stat ]
Pedro> I think that we need to:
Pedro> - #undef stat before including bfd headers.
Pedro> - Redefine it afterwards back to rpl_stat (*)
Pedro> - add some kind of wrapper around bfd_stat (like maybe called gdb_bfd_stat)
Pedro> that handles the mismatch. Something like:
I read the thread again but I found it hard to figure out which
alternative of the ones presented is preferred.
Could you tell me which one it is?
I'd like to update these patches and fix the caching bug as well.
thanks,
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-01 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-14 21:10 [PATCH 0/3] Fix gdb's BFD cache Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 21:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] Avoid hash table corruption in gdb_bfd.c Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 22:26 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-14 21:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] Consistently use BFD's time Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 23:17 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-15 17:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-16 20:47 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-16 21:58 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-16 22:31 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-17 8:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-17 18:32 ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-17 21:03 ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-18 11:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-20 15:52 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-20 15:53 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-20 20:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-20 20:58 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-21 15:50 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-21 19:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-21 17:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-23 22:05 ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-19 17:51 ` Tom Tromey
2020-04-01 20:20 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2020-06-18 14:14 ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-18 15:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-18 16:00 ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-18 17:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-18 17:32 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-18 17:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-19 12:02 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-19 12:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-19 17:09 ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-19 20:24 ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-19 23:05 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-21 19:39 ` Tom Tromey
2020-07-28 19:31 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-13 12:15 ` Tom de Vries
2020-08-14 23:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-08-23 16:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-08-23 23:32 ` Pedro Alves
2020-08-24 20:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-09-02 14:45 ` Tom Tromey
2020-09-02 14:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-06-18 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-14 22:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] Further simplify gdb BFD caching Tom Tromey
2020-01-23 22:30 ` Tom Tromey
2020-09-02 18:45 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sghnyn31.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@adacore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox